Investment Company Reporting Modernization Frequently Asked Questions
July 17, 2017
The staff of the Division of Investment Management has prepared the following responses to questions related to the investment company reporting modernization reforms adopted in October 2016 and expects to update this document from time to time to include responses to additional questions. These responses represent the views of the staff of the Division of Investment Management. They are not a rule, regulation, or statement of the Commission, and the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved these FAQs or the interpretive answers to these FAQs. The adopting release for the investment company reporting modernization reforms (“Adopting Release”) is available at: https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2016/33-10231.pdf.
If you have questions about filing requirements related to Form N-CEN and Form N-PORT, please contact the IM Investment Company Regulation Office at 202-551-6792. Those who encounter problems during the testing or filing of those forms or who have questions regarding the technical specifications may email StructuredData@sec.gov with the subject line “NPORT/NCEN Feedback.”
Compliance Dates and General Filing Obligations
1. What is the schedule for release of the schema and the beginning of the test filing period, if any, for new Forms N-PORT and N-CEN?
The schemas for Forms N-PORT and N-CEN are available for viewing at https://www.sec.gov/oit/Article/info-edgar-tech-specs.html.
Test filing will be permitted following EDGAR Release 17.3 later this year. During the testing period, filers should identify their filings as “test” filings. “Live” filings will not be permitted, and the system will reject such filings, until the compliance dates for the forms. Test filings will not be evaluated for compliance with the forms or be available for public viewing.
2. What are the respective compliance dates for Form N-PORT, Form N-CEN, the amendments to Regulation S-X, and the securities lending disclosures related amendments to Forms N-1A, N-3, and N-CSR?
Form N-PORT: As discussed in the Adopting Release, larger entities—funds that together with other investment companies in the same group of related investment companies have net assets of $1 billion or more as of the end of the most recent fiscal year of the fund—have a compliance date of June 1, 2018. Smaller entities have a compliance date of June 1, 2019. Funds must file reports on Form N-PORT no later than 30 days after the end of each month. Compliance should be based on reporting period-end date. This means, for example, that funds that are part of larger entities would file their first reports on Form N-PORT, reflecting data as of June 30, 2018, no later than July 30, 2018.
Form N-CEN: The compliance date for Form N-CEN is June 1, 2018 for all funds. Funds must report on Form N-CEN within 75 days of the fund’s fiscal year-end (75 days after the calendar year-end for unit investment trusts). Compliance should be based on reporting period-end date. For example, a fund with a June 30 fiscal year-end should make its first filing for the year ended June 30, 2018 on Form N-CEN by September 13, 2018. A fund with a May 31 fiscal year-end would not need to make its first filing on Form N-CEN until the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019 (with such filing being made within 75 days of that date) because May 31, 2018 is prior to Form N-CEN’s compliance date.
Regulation S-X: The compliance date for these amendments is August 1, 2017. Compliance should be based on reporting period-end date. For example, financial statements contained in a report on Form N-CSR for the period ended June 30, 2017, need not comply with the amendments to Regulation S-X, even though that report is required to be filed by September 8, 2017 (i.e., 70 days after the period end date). Financial statements in reports on Forms N-CSR, N-Q, 10-K or 10-Q (whether quarterly, semi-annual, or annual) for the period ended August 31, 2017, should comply with the amendments to Regulation S-X since the period ends after the compliance date of August 1, 2017.
Securities lending disclosures: The compliance date for these amendments to Form N-1A, N-3, and N-CSR is August 1, 2017. Compliance should be based on reporting period-end date. Thus, open-end funds and separate accounts offering variable annuity contracts that have fiscal-year ends following the compliance date should reflect these amendments as part of their next annual update of their prospectuses. For example, a July 31 fiscal year-end open-end fund should first reflect the amendments in its prospectus update following the July 31, 2018 fiscal year-end. For closed-end funds, the amendments to Form N-CSR should be reflected beginning with the first Form N-CSR relating to an annual reporting period ended after the compliance date. Thus, a February 28 fiscal year-end closed-end fund should first reflect the amendments in its report on Form N-CSR for the annual reporting period ending February 28, 2018.
3. When determining whether a fund is part of a “group of related investment companies” that has reached the $1 billion threshold that distinguishes larger and smaller entities for Form N-PORT compliance date purposes, should assets of private funds be included in calculating the $1 billion threshold?
No. A private fund relying on section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 is not an investment company and thus would not be part of a group of related investment companies.
4. What are funds’ filing obligations with respect to Form N-Q and Form N-CSR once they are required to comply with Form N-PORT?
Once a fund begins filing reports on Form N-PORT, it will no longer be required to file reports on Form N-Q. Moreover, when a fund ceases filing reports on Form N-Q, its certification on Form N-CSR must cover any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal half-year, rather than the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter as currently required.
For example, the staff believes that a fund that is part of a larger entity, for which the Form N-PORT compliance date is June 1, 2018, would file the Regulation S-X compliant portfolio schedule as Exhibit F to Form N-PORT relating to the 3rd and 9th fiscal months beginning June 1, 2018, in lieu of Form N-Q, even though Form N-Q will not be rescinded until August 1, 2019.
As noted above, a fund with a March 31 fiscal year-end that is part of a larger entity should first file a report on Form N-PORT, relating to the month ended June 30, 2018, no later than July 30, 2018 (30 days after the reporting period end date). No later than August 29, 2018 (which is 60 days after the reporting period end date), the fund should file Exhibit F to Form N-PORT containing the fund’s Regulation S-X compliant portfolio schedule, listing holdings as of June 30, 2018 (rather than filing a report on Form N-Q containing the portfolio schedule). No later than December 9, 2018 (70 days after the reporting period end date), the fund should also file a report on Form N-CSR for the semi-annual period ended September 30, 2018, with a certification covering any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal half-year.
5. Will money market funds continue to file reports on Form N-Q after the form is rescinded on August 1, 2019?
No. A money market fund with a fiscal year-end of August 31 will make its final Form N-Q filing for the quarter ended May 31, 2019. This is because the filing is due by July 30, 2019 (60 days after the reporting period end date), which is before the date Form N-Q is rescinded.
A money market fund with a fiscal year-end of September 30 would not make a Form N-Q filing for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 (because the filing will be due after the rescission of Form N-Q). Such a fund’s final Form N-Q filing will cover the quarter ended December 31, 2018. Moreover, when a money market fund ceases filing reports on Form N-Q, its certification on Form N-CSR must cover any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal half-year, rather than the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter as currently required.
Money market funds must, however, continue to post their portfolio holdings on a web site monthly pursuant to rule 2a-7(h)(10) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and file Form N-MFP monthly pursuant to rule 30b1-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Money market funds also must continue to file Form N-Q until the form is rescinded on August 1, 2019.
6. If a fund’s fiscal year ends on April 30 or May 31, then the fund’s final filing on Form N-SAR (due 60 days after its fiscal year-end) would be after Form N-SAR is scheduled to be rescinded on June 1, 2018. May the fund file its final report for FY 2017-2018 on either Forms N-SAR or N-CEN?
The staff believes that funds with a fiscal year-end on April 30 or May 31, 2018 may file their final reports for fiscal year 2017-2018 on either Form N-SAR (due 60 days after the reporting period end) or Form N-CEN (due 75 days after the reporting period end).
Although reports on Form N-SAR will no longer be required to be filed after June 1, 2018, EDGAR will accept Form N-SAR filings, including amendments to previously filed reports on Form N-SAR, until June 30, 2019.
1. If a fund uses T+1 accounting to report portfolio holdings on Form N-PORT, may it calculate and report portfolio- and security-level risk metrics on a T+0 basis in Item B.3 and Items C.9.f.5, C.11.c.vii, and C.11.g.iv?
The Commission staff would not object if a fund distinguishes between the basis on which it calculates portfolio holdings and the basis on which it calculates risk metrics. Thus, the staff believes that a fund that uses T+1 accounting for daily NAV calculation and for purposes of reporting portfolio holdings on Form N-PORT may calculate and report security- and portfolio-level risk metrics required by the form on a T+0 basis, provided that the reported information also complies with General Instruction G.
2. How will Form N-PORT Part F attachments be added to filings made on Form N-PORT?
Funds must file reports on Form N-PORT up to 30 days after the end of each month, but may file Part F attachments up to 60 days after the end of the reporting period. As will be detailed more fully in the EDGAR Filing Manual, Part F attachments and amendments to those attachments should be filed as EDGAR submission types “NPORT-EX” and “NPORT-EX/A,” respectively. Funds should also provide the accession number of the related report on Form N-PORT, so that the Part F submission can be attached to that report by the Commission. Adding the Part F attachment in this manner will not cause the original report on Form N-PORT to be marked as amended in EDGAR. Additional details and instructions will be provided in the EDGAR filing manual.
3. Some trusts that have multiple series all with the same fiscal year end currently include in their shareholder reports and on Form N-Q portfolio schedules for each of the different series, as well as one set of financial statement notes that cover all of the different series combined into one document. Can funds continue this practice when filing their Form N-PORT Part F attachments?
Yes. The Part F attachment is designed to ensure that notwithstanding the rescission of Form N-Q, portfolio holdings schedules for the first and third fiscal quarters continue to be presented using the form and content which investors are accustomed to viewing in reports on Form N-Q and in shareholder reports. The staff therefore believes that the Part F attachment may contain the portfolio schedule for the series making the filing, as well as the portfolio schedules for the other series in the trust with the same fiscal year-end and one set of financial statement notes that cover all of the different series combined into one Part F attachment.
4. Will reports filed for the month ended December 31, 2018 be the first Form N-PORT filings made public?
Yes. The SEC states in the Adopting Release that it has “determined to maintain as nonpublic all reports filed on Form N-PORT for the first six months following June 1, 2018.” This means that reports filed on Form N-PORT for the months ended June 30 through November 30, 2018 will be non-public, and that reports filed for the months ended December 31, 2018 and later will be made public (but only those filings for the third month of each fund’s fiscal quarter). Commission staff notes, however, that even during the six-month non-public filing period, portfolio holdings information filed as exhibits to Form N-PORT (i.e., Form N-PORT Part F attachments) for the first and third quarters of the fund’s fiscal year will be made public.
5. Form N-PORT requires funds to file reports within 30 days of month-end. How should funds report values for holdings where no market value is available at that point for month-end?
In response to commenters, the Commission noted in the Adopting Release that while most closed-end funds do strike their NAV on at least a monthly basis, those funds that do not do so may report information on Form N-PORT by using their internal methodologies consistent with how they report internally and to current and prospective investors, as allowed by General Instruction G to Form N-PORT. Funds that value their holdings by relying upon their internal methodologies in this manner may provide additional information in Part E (explanatory notes to Form N-PORT) explaining the internal methodology.
6. Item B.5.a of Form N-PORT requires funds to report monthly total returns for each of the preceding three months for each class of a multiple class fund, and Item B.5.b of Form N-PORT requires funds to report class identification numbers, if any, of the class(es) for which returns are reported. What happens if a class terminates during the reporting period?
A fund should report all information for each of its classes through the reporting period in which the class existed. For example, if a fund class terminates in January, the fund should continue reporting the Items B.5.a and B.5.b information for that class through its March Form N-PORT filing (which would be due thirty days after March 31). The March Form N-PORT filing should include monthly total returns for January, which should include the return information for the terminated class, as well as return information for February and March, which would not include any return information for the terminated class. Funds instead should report “N/A” for the return information for the terminated class for February and March. See Instruction G to Form N-PORT.
7. Item B.6 of Form N-PORT requires funds to provide aggregate flow information for the preceding three months. How should master portfolios report flow information?
The staff believes that master portfolios should provide flow information at the master portfolio level for transactions between the master portfolio and its feeder funds.
8. Items C.2.b and C.2.c require funds to report, for each investment, the currency in which the investment is denominated and the value in U.S. dollars (and if the currency is not denominated in U.S. dollars, the exchange rate used to calculate value). How should funds report this information for foreign forward currency contracts?
For foreign forward currency contracts, funds must report value in U.S. dollars in Item C.2.c, however the Commission staff would not object if funds report “N/A” for the other reporting requirements in Items C.2.b and c because that information is separately reported in Items C.11.e.i and ii (amount and description of currency sold and purchased, respectively).
9, For purposes of Item C.4 (asset and issuer type), how should funds report investments in shares of other funds?
In responding to Item C.4.a (asset type) for investments in the shares of other funds, the staff believes that the reporting fund should report the asset type as either “short-term investment vehicle” (e.g., money market fund, liquidity pool, or other cash management vehicle) or “equity-common” (other funds).
In responding to Item C.4.b (issuer type) for investments in other funds, the staff believes that the reporting fund should report the issuer as “registered fund” or “private fund,” as appropriate.
10. For purposes of Item C.6 (identifying restricted securities), may funds consider the guidance provided by the Commission in the Adopting Release for the amendments to Article 12 of Regulation S-X regarding identification of restricted investments? For example, the Adopting Release provides that, for the amendments to Regulation S-X, a fund should indicate that a derivative that cannot be sold as of the reporting date because of a restriction applicable to the investment itself (as opposed to, e.g., illiquidity in the markets) should be identified as a restricted investment.
When reporting restricted securities on Form N-PORT, Commission staff believes that funds may consider the Commission guidance provided for amendments to Article 12 of Regulation S-X regarding identification of restricted securities in financial statements.
11. Item C.9.b.i of Form N-PORT requires funds to select the category that most closely reflects the coupon type of debt securities among the following: fixed, floating, variable, none. How should funds distinguish between debt securities that have a floating versus a variable rate of return?
The staff believes that funds may look to definitions in rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act to make these determinations. Rule 2a-7(a)(13) defines a “floating rate security,” in part, as a security the terms of which provide for the adjustment of its interest rate whenever a specified interest rate changes. Rule 2a-7(a)(27) defines a “variable rate security,” in part, as a security the terms of which provide for the adjustment of its interest rate on set dates (such as the last day of a month or calendar quarter).
12. Item C.10.f requires funds to report certain collateral information for securities subject to repurchase agreements, including the principal amount, value of collateral, and category of investments that most closely represents the collateral. Must that information be reported for each category of investments, and to what extent can that information be aggregated?
A fund should separately report this information for each category of investments. However, the staff would not object if funds aggregated the principal amount and value of collateral for each category of investments, regardless of whether the collateral is issued by the same issuer. For example, a fund with a repurchase agreement collateralized by approximately $2 million in various asset-backed securities and $1 million in corporate debt securities might respond to Item C.10.f by reporting, in part, as follows:
C.10.f.i. $2,000,000, C.10.f.ii. $2,001,932.45, C.10.f.iii. asset-backed securities
C.10.f.i. $1,000,000, C.10.f.ii. $1,000,412.23, C.10.f.iii. corporate debt securities
13. Item C.11.c.iii.2 contemplates a tiered reporting structure for the reporting of derivatives where the underlying asset is an index or basket of investments. If the index’s or custom basket’s components are not publicly available and the notional amount of the derivative represents greater than 1%, but 5% or less, of the net asset value of the fund, the fund will provide the name, identifier, number of shares or notional amount or contract value as of the trade date, and value, for (i) the 50 largest components in the index and (ii) any other components where the notional value for that component is over 1% of the notional value of the index or custom basket. Likewise, if the index’s or custom basket’s components are not publicly available and the notional amount of the derivative represents more than 5% of the net asset value of the fund, the fund will provide the name, identifier, number of shares or notional amount or contract value as of the trade date, and value, for all of the index’s or custom basket’s components. Can funds voluntarily report information about all the underlying index components even when such disclosure is not required?
14. For Form N-PORT and in the amendments to Regulation S-X, the reporting of notional amount is required for many different derivatives investments, but can be calculated in different ways. Is there a prescribed calculation of notional amount that funds should follow?
The Commission staff understands that funds currently use different methods for calculating notional amount of a derivatives investment. For example, the staff understands that some common methods used by funds for determining a derivative transaction’s notional amount may include the methods listed in Table 1 on page 69 of the Derivatives Proposing Release. However, the staff notes that funds would not delta-adjust the notional amount for options, as reflected in Table 1, because Form N-PORT separately requires delta and Article 12 of Regulation S-X specifically requires notional amount without a delta adjustment.
15. Should funds report TBAs on Form N-PORT as derivatives?
“To Be Announced” or “TBAs” is a phrase commonly used to describe forward mortgage-backed securities trades. The term TBA is derived from the fact that the actual mortgage-backed security that will be delivered to fulfill a TBA trade is not designated at the time the trade is made. The staff recognizes that some funds currently disclose TBAs in their financial statements either as derivatives or securities, depending on, among other factors, whether TBAs are cash settled (derivative) or physically settled (security).
Instruction G to Form N-PORT provides that funds may respond using their own internal methodologies and the conventions of their service providers, provided the information is consistent with information that they report internally and to current and prospective investors. Thus, the staff believes that to the extent funds categorize TBAs as derivatives in their portfolio holdings, as reported internally and to current and prospective investors, they may also do so in their reports on Form N-PORT.
1. Rules 12-13, 12-13A, 12-13B, 12-13C, 12-13D, and 12-14 prescribe information to be presented for derivatives contracts, other investments, and investments in affiliates. The rules contemplate a tabular format where each row is an individual contract or investment, and each column is a specified data element (e.g., description, number of contracts, expiration date, notional amount). Must the columns appear in the exact order specified in the rules, and to the extent that certain columns contain the same information, can such columns be merged if the heading of the merged column appropriately discloses what the information represents?
The staff believes that the order of the columns need not be the same as the order set forth in the rules. Additionally, when columns contain the same information, the staff believes that the information may be provided in a single column provided that the heading to the column clearly discloses what the information represents. For example, when the value of a futures contract is the same as the unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the contract, the value and unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the contract may be presented under one column with a heading such as “Value and unrealized appreciation/depreciation.”
2. Article 12 of Regulation S-X requires, in certain circumstances, for derivatives where the underlying asset is an index or basket of investments, that funds disclose the 50 largest components in the index or custom basket. How should short positions be treated for these purposes? Will every underlying instrument have a notional value to determine this calculation?
For purposes of these calculations, the staff believes that the notional values of short positions should be treated in terms of their absolute values because Article 12 requires that the fund disclose the largest components of an index or basket and the staff believes that the magnitude of a component does not depend on whether the position is long or short.
The staff recognizes that all components would have a notional amount or other metric to evaluate the magnitude of the components in the index or custom basket, although the staff believes that the metric utilized could be determined differently based on the nature of the investment. For example, notional amount should be used for swaps, while the staff believes par value and value could be used for bonds and equities, respectively.
3. Article 12 of Regulation S-X requires, in certain circumstances, for derivatives where the underlying asset is an index or basket of investments, that funds disclose for each component of the index or custom basket a “description of the underlying investment as required by [rules] 210.12-12, 12-13, 12-13A, 12-13B or 12-13D as part of the description.” Rules 12-12, 12-13, 12-13A, 12-13B and 12-13D, in turn, require a fund to disclose information about each investment in columns, and each column has notes describing certain requirements. Do funds need to include in the description of each component of an index or custom basket all of the information required by the notes to all of the columns in rules 12-12, 12-13, 12-13A, 12-13B or 12-13D, or only the information required by the notes in certain columns related to the description of the components?
When providing a description of the components of the index or custom basket, the staff would not object if funds limit their disclosures to the information required by the column in each of the tables included in Article 12 that relate to the description of the instrument, including any notes in that column. For example, if the underlying component of the index or basket of investments is a derivative that would normally be presented in accordance with rule 12-13 of Regulation S-X, the staff believes that the fund should provide the information required by Column A (description), including the notes to Column A. The staff believes, if the underlying component is a security that would normally be presented in accordance with rule 12-12 of Regulation S-X, the fund would provide the information required by Column A of rule 12-12 (related to the name of the issuer and the title of the issue), including the notes to Column A.
4. Rules 12-13 through 12-13D require funds to "[i]ndicate by an appropriate symbol each investment which cannot be sold because of restrictions or conditions applicable to the investment." Certain derivatives transactions may be subject to limitations such that they cannot be “sold,” but the fund would be able to exit the transaction through other means, such as through the execution of an offsetting transaction. For example, a fund would exit a futures transaction by entering into an offsetting transaction. How should the fund treat these types of transactions for the purposes of rules 12-13 to 12-13D?
The Commission staff recognizes that a fund may exit derivatives transactions through means other than sale, such as through a negotiated agreement with the fund’s counterparty, a transfer to another party, or close out of the position through execution of an offsetting transaction. The staff believes that a fund should identify a derivatives transaction as restricted if, as of the balance sheet date, the fund would not have been able to exit the transaction.
5. Do the disclosures required by rule 12-14 of Regulation S-X regarding investments in and advances to affiliates need to be presented in the schedule of investments, or can they be presented in the notes to the financial statements?
The Commission staff understands that the disclosures required by rule 12-14 relate to investments that are already presented in the schedule of investments under rules 12-12 and 12-13 through 12-13D, and, as such and to preserve the readability of the schedule of investments, would not object if funds chose to provide the additional disclosures required by rule 12-14 in the notes to the financial statements.
6. Rule 6-04.6 of S-X requires a fund to "State separately amounts held by others in connection with: (a) short sales; (b) open options contracts; (c) futures contracts; (d) forward foreign currency contracts; (e) swap contracts; and (f) investments-other than those presented in rules 210.12-12, 12-12A, 12-12B, 12-13, 12-13A, 12-13B and 12-13C.” In some cases, however, a fund’s counterparty will collect margin or collateral for all open derivatives transactions between the fund and the counterparty. That is, the fund will post (or receive) a single net amount of margin or collateral for all of the fund’s open transactions. The counterparty will not separately collect margin or collateral for each particular type of transaction, making it not practicable for the fund to identify the portions of any margin or collateral posted by the fund attributable to each of the types of investments specified in Rule 6-04.6. In these circumstances, may a fund instead provide disclosure about the arrangements with counterparties in the notes to the financial statements that includes a description of the rights of setoff and the amounts held by each counterparty in connection with the investments specified in Rule 6-04.6?
The Commission staff would not object to a fund providing the amounts held by others in connection with derivative contracts by counterparty in the notes to the financial statements under these circumstances, provided that the disclosure also includes the rights of setoff associated with the investments and the effect of the arrangements with counterparties on the fund’s balance sheet.
1. How should information be reported for Item C.2.a of Form N-CEN (number of authorized classes of shares of the fund) for funds that have not adopted a plan pursuant to rule 18f-3?
We understand that some open-end funds and exchange-traded funds consist of a series without an “authorized” class (i.e., funds that have not adopted a plan pursuant to rule 18f-3). In this case, the fund would have a class ID only because EDGAR issues every series a corresponding class ID.
The staff believes that a fund without an “authorized” class should report “0” to Item C.2.a (number of authorized classes of shares of the fund). However, as per the requirements of Form N-CEN, the fund must report its ticker and class ID if applicable in response to Item C.2.d (which requests the name, class ID and ticker of each class with shares outstanding).
2. Item C.10.vii of Form N-CEN requires funds to report information on sub-transfer agents. Are funds required to report information on intermediaries, such as broker-dealers, that provide “sub-transfer agent” or administrative services for their customers whose shares are maintained in omnibus accounts with the fund’s primary transfer agent?
No. Item C.10.vii requires funds to report their transfer agent arrangements, including arrangements where systems, transaction processing and services are provided by sub-transfer agents in supporting the fund’s primary transfer agent systems and recordkeeping functions (such as part of a remote systems or hybrid or fully outsourced arrangement).
In the staff’s view, for purposes of Item C.10.vii, funds do not need to identify intermediary arrangements (e.g., with broker-dealer firms and other intermediaries such as retirement plan third-party administrators) that are administrative service type arrangements (also sometimes referred to as “sub-accounting” and “sub-transfer agent” arrangements), because such firms are engaging with the primary transfer agent as record owners of fund shares and conducting transactions with fund’s transfer agent on behalf of their customers who are beneficial or underlying shareholders in funds, and such arrangements are not part of the primary transfer agent’s recordkeeping arrangement with the fund, as described above.
3. If a variable insurance product no longer files post-effective prospectus amendments, for example, because the variable insurance product is no longer being sold, is the registrant still required to file reports on Form N-CEN?
Variable insurance products are required to file periodic reports with the Commission pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act and therefore must continue to file annual reports on Form N-CEN even when the variable insurance product no longer files post-effective amendments.
 The planned deployment date for EDGAR Release 17.3 is September 2017.
 Note that June 30, 2018 is a Saturday. Per Instruction A to Form N-PORT, funds must report information about their portfolios and each of their portfolio holdings as of the last business day, or last calendar day of the month.
 Section 3(c)(1) excludes from the definition of “investment company” any issuer whose outstanding securities (other than short-term paper) are beneficially owned by not more than one hundred persons and which is not making and does not presently propose to make a public offering of its securities. Section 3(c)(7) excludes from the definition of “investment company” any issuer, the outstanding securities of which are owned exclusively by persons who, at the time of acquisition of such securities, are qualified purchasers, and which is not making and does not at that time propose to make a public offering of such securities.
 See Adopting Release, at section II.B.1.
 See Adopting Release, at section II.B.2.
 See Adopting Release, at section II.B.2.
 Instruction G to Form N-PORT provides that funds may respond using their own internal methodologies and the conventions of their service providers, provided the information is consistent with information that they report internally and to current and prospective investors.
 See Adopting Release at n.460 and accompanying text.
 Instruction G states that, “[i]f a sub-item requests information that is not applicable (for example, an LEI for a counterparty that does not have an LEI), respond N/A.”
 See Adopting Release, at section II.C.4. See also rule 12-13, n.6 of Regulation S-X; see also rules 12-13A, n.4; 12-13B, n.2; 12-13C, n.5; and 12-13D, n.6 of Regulation S-X.
 See Use of Derivatives by Registered Investment Companies and Business Development Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 31933 (Dec. 11, 2015) [80 FR 80884 (Dec. 28, 2015)] (“Derivatives Proposing Release”), at text following n.162.
 See, e.g., Rule 12-13, nn.1, 2, and 3 of Regulation S-X.
 See, e.g., Rule 12-12, nn.1, 2, 3, and 4 of Regulation S-X.
 See Rules 12-13, n.6; 12-13A, n.4; 12-13B, n.2; 12-13C, n.5; 12-13D, n.6 of Regulation S-X.
 See, e.g., Derivatives Proposing Release, at text following footnote 335.
 See ASC 210-20-50.
 See also Adopting Release, at section II.D.4.c.vi.
 See, e.g., Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co., SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Oct. 23, 1990).