Please find written input submissions to the Crypto Task Force below. The written input is posted without modification. We hope sharing the submissions will help encourage productive dialogue and continued engagement. Please note that the “Key Points” and “Topics” are AI generated. AI can make mistakes, and the Key Points and Topics are not a replacement for you reading the submissions. The Crypto Task Force has not reviewed these AI-generated summaries for accuracy or completeness. If you believe a Key Point or Topic is inaccurate, please email the Crypto Task Force at crypto@sec.gov. The written input provided to the SEC and posted on this page does not necessarily reflect the views of the Crypto Task Force or others in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date Written Input Topic(s) Key Points
Donna Redel, Ivo Entchev, Olta Andoni, and Stephen Rutenberg, Crypto Policy Working Group

Letter to the Crypto Task Force
Custody, Security Status, Trading
  • Self-custody wallets are not considered custodians under U.S. securities law as users retain exclusive control over their private keys and assets.
  • Self-custody wallets do not meet the definition of an exchange under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as they do not match orders or facilitate securities trading among multiple participants.
  • Self-custody wallets are not brokers under the Exchange Act, as they do not solicit transactions, route orders, match trades, or hold funds in escrow on behalf of clients.
North Capital Private Securities Corporation

RE: Custody of Tokenized Securities by Clearing and Carrying Broker-Dealers
Custody, Tokenization, Trading
  • The document emphasizes the need for the SEC to differentiate between Bearer Digital Asset Securities (BDAS) and Tokenized Securities in its regulations, as the risks associated with BDAS do not apply to Tokenized Securities.
  • It argues that Tokenized Securities should be treated like traditional securities if they incorporate key safety attributes, such as maintaining a redundant secondary record on the blockchain and not being issued in bearer form.
  • The document urges the SEC to provide new interpretive guidance or no-action relief to allow broker-dealers to use issuers or transfer agents as control locations for Tokenized Securities, facilitating scalable solutions for clearing and custody.
Plume Network Inc.

Subject: Comments on the SEC Crypto Task Force’s “There Must Be Some Way Out of Here” Request for Input Questions
Regulatory Sandbox, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Tokenization
  • Permissionless or open, public blockchains, including decentralized finance (DeFi), are best positioned to enable the SEC to meet its policy goals relating to capital and digital asset markets.
  • Safe harbor exemptive relief should extend to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as well as the Securities Act of 1933, and incorporate specific considerations related to DeFi.
  • The SEC should implement a regulatory sandbox for securities tokenization on open blockchains to develop a new regulatory architecture leveraging open blockchains and complementary technologies.
John A. Zecca, Nasdaq, Inc.

Re: Nasdaq’s Crypto ETP Response to the February 21, 2025 Statement by Commissioner Hester Peirce Entitled “There Must Be Some Way Out of Here”
Crypto ETPs, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Trading
  • Nasdaq supports a balanced framework that enables innovative crypto ETP offerings while maintaining regulatory safeguards to protect investors and market integrity.
  • Nasdaq urges the SEC to modernize its approach and support the development of the digital asset ecosystem on national securities exchanges along more consistent lines.
  • Nasdaq recommends that the SEC work with national securities exchanges and market participants to establish clear and consistent standards for evaluating crypto ETP proposals.
Blockchain Association

Re: Written Input Regarding Trading-Related Topics
Custody, RFI Responses, Security Status, Trading
  • The Blockchain Association (BA) advocates for an incremental, flexible approach to regulating crypto asset trading, emphasizing the need for the SEC to adapt existing rules to accommodate technological and market innovations.
  • BA suggests that the SEC should not impose requirements for investors to transact through intermediaries, and should leverage blockchain technology to enhance market efficiency and transparency.
  • BA recommends specific updates to SEC rules, including relief from certain timing requirements for trade confirmations, modifications to net capital rules for broker-dealers, and allowing blockchain-based books and records for regulatory purposes.
Center for Audit Quality

Re: Commissioner Hester M. Peirce’s Statement There Must Be Some Way Out of Here
Custody, Security Status, Trading
  • The CAQ supports increased regulatory clarity related to crypto assets and commends the establishment of the Crypto Task Force to advance this objective.
  • The CAQ encourages the SEC to coordinate with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to provide additional accounting and auditing guidance for crypto assets.
  • The CAQ highlights the importance of stakeholder education on crypto assets for capital markets stakeholders, including investors and board members.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Letter to the Crypto Task Force
Custody, Public Offerings, RFI Responses, Security Status
  • PwC emphasizes the need for a framework that identifies how the characteristics of different crypto assets (e.g., stablecoins, non-fungible tokens) determine their security status.
  • PwC suggests leveraging existing public offering rules with necessary modifications for crypto assets that meet the definition of a security.
  • PwC recommends expanding custody-related regulations to provide adequate investor protection for crypto assets, even if they do not meet the definition of a security.
Jump Crypto

Re: Application of the Federal Securities Laws to the Digital Asset Market
RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Trading
  • The SEC should clarify that most digital assets and digital-asset transactions are not investment contracts under current law.
  • The SEC should use its exemptive authority to make clear that digital assets and transactions without forward-looking contractual obligations are not subject to federal securities laws.
  • If a safe harbor is established, it should be based on the concept of "control" rather than ownership to determine the applicability of securities laws.
Andreessen Horowitz, a16z

Re: Comments on the SEC Crypto Task Force’s Questions Concerning Public Offerings and Safe Harbor from Registration
RFI Responses
  • Andreessen Horowitz recommends that the SEC establish a taxonomy that clearly identifies when crypto assets may be subject to registration requirements.
  • Andreessen Horowitz recommends that the SEC issue interpretive guidance that distinguishes between seven types of crypto assets.
  • Andreessen Horowitz recommends that the SEC provide exemptive relief, where necessary, to: establish a tailored disclosure framework, clarify reporting requirements under the Exchange Act, provide a pathway for decentralization under Exchange Act requirements, and enable onchain transactions of registered crypto assets.
James Wigginton, Coalition for Cooperative Blockchain Organizations

Navigating DAO Legality (Opolis)
Tokenization
  • The advent of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations has ushered in a new era of collaborative innovation and community-drive governance.
  • In the pursuit of establishing web3 as a transformative force, three fundamental principles must be addressed: transparent, dencentralized technology; durable game incentives with aligned economics; and an unchangeable ethos of benevolence toward all stakeholders.
  • Limited Cooperative Associations emerge as the keystone that harmonizes with the fundamental principles of stability, aligned incentives, and a benevolent ethos.