Skip to main content

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Rule Amendments to Broker-Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer, and Major Security-Based Swap Participant Electronic Recordkeeping Requirements

Jan. 18, 2023

The Division of Trading and Markets (“Division”), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), has prepared the following responses to questions about the recent amendments to the electronic recordkeeping requirements applicable to broker-dealers, security-based swap dealers (“SBSDs”) and major security-based swap participants (“MSBSPs”).  These responses represent the views of the staff of the Division.  They are not a rule, regulation, or statement of the Commission. The Commission has neither approved nor disapproved this content.  These responses, like all staff statements, have no legal force or effect: they do not alter or amend applicable law, and they create no new or additional obligations for any person.  Additional information can be found in the Commission’s adopting release

The staff may update these questions and answers periodically.  In each update, the questions added after publication of the last version will be marked with “MODIFIED” or “NEW”.

Effective Date / Compliance Date of the Amendments

Question 1:  The effective date for the amendments to Rule 17a-4, applicable to broker-dealers, including broker-dealers registered as SBSDs and MSBSPs, was January 3, 2023.  The compliance date for the amendments to Rule 17a-4 is May 3, 2023. Rule 17a-4 currently requires a broker-dealer to maintain and preserve electronic records exclusively in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format (also known as a write once, read many (“WORM”) format).  The amendments to Rule 17a-4 add an audit-trail alternative to the WORM requirement.  Under the audit-trail alternative, a broker-dealer must use an electronic recordkeeping system that maintains and preserves electronic records in a manner that permits the recreation of an original record if it is modified or deleted.  Can a broker-dealer begin complying with the audit-trail alternative before the May 3, 2023 compliance date for the amendments?

Answer:  Yes, beginning on or after the January 3, 2023 effective date of the amendments to Rule 17a-4, a broker-dealer can comply with the audit-trail alternative.  The provisions of paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) and (j) of Rule 17a-4, as amended, effective on January 3, 2023, constitute the required elements for a broker-dealer that elects the audit-trail alternative.[1]  Consequently, compliance with the audit-trail alternative means compliance with paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) and (j) of Rule 17a-4, as amended, effective on January 3, 2023.[2]  

Question 2:  The Commission amended the requirements in Rule 17a-4 that a “designated third party” must execute and file undertakings agreeing to, among other things, promptly furnish the Commission and other securities regulators the information necessary to download records kept on the electronic storage media to any medium acceptable under Rule 17a-4.  The amendments to Rule 17a-4 give the broker-dealer the option to designate an executive officer to make the required undertakings in lieu of designating a third party.[3]  Can a broker-dealer switch from using a third party to a designated executive officer for the purposes of executing these undertakings before the May 3, 2023 compliance date for the amendments?

Answer:  Yes, beginning on or after the January 3, 2023 effective date of the amendments to Rule 17a-4 a broker-dealer can switch from using a third party to a designated executive officer for purposes of executing these undertakings.  The requirements for using a designated executive officer are set forth in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(3)(v) of Rule 17a-4, as amended, effective on January 3, 2023.  Consequently, to use a designated executive officer in lieu of a designated third party, the broker-dealer must meet the requirements of paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(3)(v) of Rule 17a-4, as amended, effective on January 3, 2023. 

 

[1] See Exchange Act Release No. 96034 (October 12, 2022), 87 FR 66412, 66415-66427, and 66430 (November 3, 2022) (“Commission Adopting Release”) (discussing the requirements associated with the audit trail alternative). 

[2] In contrast, the amended requirements of paragraph (i) of Rule 17a-4 are independent of the audit-trail alternative.  Therefore, a broker-dealer that elects to comply with the audit-trail alternative prior to the May 3, 2023 compliance date can continue to comply with the pre-amendment requirements of paragraph (i) of Rule 17a-4 until the May 3, 2023 compliance date, at which time the broker-dealer must comply with paragraph (i) of Rule 17a-4, as amended.  See Commission Adopting Release at 66427-66430 (discussing the requirements associated with the alternative undertaking permitted under paragraph (i) of Rule 17a-4).

[3] Rule 17a-4 currently requires a broker-dealer exclusively using electronic storage media for some or all of its record preservation to have a third party, who has access to and the ability to download information from the broker-dealer’s electronic storage media to any acceptable medium under the rule and who executes and files with the broker-dealer’s designated examining authority, written undertakings agreeing to, among other things, promptly furnish to the Commission and other securities regulators the information necessary to download records kept on the electronic storage media to any medium acceptable under Rule 17a-4.  The amendments to Rule 17a-4 modify the form of the undertakings to make them more technology neutral and to provide an alternative to engaging a third party to perform this function.  Under the alternative, a broker-dealer can designate an executive officer to execute the undertakings if the executive officer has access to and the ability to provide records maintained and preserved on the broker-dealer’s electronic recordkeeping system either directly or through a specialist who reports directly or indirectly to the executive officer.  Further, the executive officer can appoint in writing up to two employees who are direct or indirect reports to fulfill the executive officer’s obligations if the executive officer is unable to fulfill those obligations.  The employees must have the same ability as the executive officer to independently access and provide the records either directly or through a specialist who reports directly or indirectly to them.  In addition, the designated executive officer can appoint in writing up to three specialists to assist in fulfilling the executive officer’s obligations.  See Commission Adopting Release at 66424-66427 (discussing the requirements associated with the designated executive officer and designated third party alternatives under Rule 17a-4).

Return to Top