Skip to main content

Commissioners' Travel

May 26, 1998

This document is an HTML formatted version of a printed document. The printed document may contain agency comments, charts, photographs, appendices, footnotes and page numbers which may not be reproduced in this electronic version. If you require a printed version of this document contact the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Inspector General, Mail Stop 11-7, 450 Fifth Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 or call (202) 942-4460.

Commissioners' Travel

Audit Report No. 280
May 26, 1998

We have evaluated the internal controls of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") with respect to the official travel of the Commissioners. We examined the relevant Commission policies and tested all of the Commissioners' travel vouchers processed during the period from October 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998.1 We tested all 46 trips (100% of the Commissioners' travel vouchers processed) to determine that the travel was for official business, was for a reasonable period of time given the purpose of the trip, and that the expenses claimed were valid.

Our testing was performed in accordance with the travel related provisions of the General Accounting Office's Guide for Evaluating and Testing Controls Over Sensitive Payments, dated May 1993. In addition, we contemporaneously compared overall Commission travel policy to the recommendations of the Subcommittee on National Economic Growth, Natural Resources, and Regulatory Affairs ("Subcommittee") of the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and performed additional control evaluations as part of our audit of travel upgrades (Audit Report No. 281).

The Commission and Commission management are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control policies and procedures. Because of inherent limitation in any system of internal control, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the controls to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the designed operations of policies and procedures may deteriorate.

We conducted our work in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards, except that our independence, with respect to the Chairman of the Commission, is limited by the provisions of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, applicable to Designated Federal Entities.

The Office of The Comptroller filed comments on our draft report (attached). Generally, it concurred with our findings and recommendations. The Office of the Comptroller indicated that the offices of the Chairman and Executive Director concurred with its comments.


The results of our tests indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the Commission complied in all material respects with the internal policies and procedures related to travel by the Commissioners. However, we are making three recommendations to improve the operations of the controls.


The Commission has agreed to report certain information about the Commissioners' travel, including the purposes of trips, to the Subcommittee on a quarterly basis. This information includes whether the Commission received an invitation for a given trip or if it was initiated by the Commission.

On 14 of the 46 vouchers tested, the purpose of the trip was not adequately documented. This meant that staff of the Comptroller's Office had to research the purpose for the trip by contacting the Commissioners' offices. This situation delays preparation of the report to the Subcommittee.

Recommendation A

The Office of the Comptroller should reiterate its guidance to the Commissioners' staffs that detailed documentation, supporting the purpose of the trip, be included with the travel order or voucher.


Internal Commission guidance requests that each traveler submit their travel voucher within five days. To determine if the Commissioners submitted their vouchers to the Comptroller's Office within five days of travel, we compared the trip completion date to the date they signed their voucher. We found that of the 46 vouchers filed, only five were signed within five days. On average, approximately 25 days elapsed before the Commissioners filed their vouchers; the range was from 2 to 99 days. These delays also interfere with the Comptroller's timely submission of the travel report to the Subcommittee.

Recommendation B

The Commissioners should establish procedures in their offices that will ensure the timely submission of their travel vouchers to the Office of the Comptroller.


Staff in each of the Commissioners' office prepare their respective Commissioner's travel vouchers.2 Seventeen percent of the Commissioners' travel vouchers (other than the Chairman's) contained errors (e.g., incorrect calculations of per diem, inclusion of unallowable expenses) that required correction by the Comptroller's Office. It is our understanding that this is a higher error rate than for the Commission staff as a whole.

Recommendation C

The Commissioners should require the staff who prepare their travel vouchers to attend travel voucher training to be provided by the Office of the Comptroller.


1  There were no relocation expenses processed during the period.

2  The Office of the Executive Director reviews the Chairman's travel vouchers before submission to the Comptroller.

Return to Top