U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
SEC Seal
Home Previous Page
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Before the

Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 8447 / July 20, 2004

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 50043 / July 20, 2004

Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-10230

In the Matter of

Allen Z. Wolfson et al.,




On June 14, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") entered an Order Instituting Public Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Sections 15(b)(6) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") ("Initial Order") against Respondent Konstantinos Dino Sonitis ("Sonitis").


Sonitis has submitted an Offer of Settlement of Konstantinos Dino Sonitis ("Offer") to these administrative proceedings, which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over him, the subject matter of these proceedings, and paragraphs III.D, which are admitted, Sonitis consents to the entry of this Order Making Findings, Imposing Remedial Sanctions, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and Sections 15(b)(6) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Order"), as set forth below.


On the basis of this Order and Sonitis' Offer, the Commission finds1 that:

  1. Sonitis was associated as a registered representative with various broker-dealers that were registered with the Commission, including: a) from December 1995 through March 1996, Meyers Pollock & Robbins, Inc.; b) from March 1996 through September 1996, Greenway Capital Corp.; c) from October 1997 through March 1998, First National Equity Corp.; and d) from August 1999 through November 2000, Bell Investment Group, Inc. ("Bell Investment"). Sonitis, age 30, resides in Brooklyn, New York.

  2. Sonitis participated in the public offering of Healthwatch, Inc. ("Healthwatch") stock, which at all relevant times was a penny stock.

  3. While associated with Bell Investment, Sonitis received bribes in exchange for creating retail demand for Healthwatch by recommending that stock to his retail customers. Sonitis did not disclose to his customers that he received additional compensation to make his penny stock recommendations.

  4. On May 30, 2001, Sonitis pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit commercial bribery in connection with the manipulation scheme concerning Healthwatch stock in U.S. v. Sonitis, 100-Cr-628-007 (JGK).

  5. In his plea allocution, Sonitis admitted that during October 1999, while he was a registered representative at Bell Investment, he knowingly received bribes of cash and free stock for recommending Healthwatch stock to his retail clients and that he did not disclose those payments to the clients.

  6. On January 25, 2002, Sonitis was sentenced to five months in prison, 24 months of supervised release, including fives months home confinement and ordered to pay a $8,000 criminal fine, the amount he received through the fraud.

  7. Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)] prohibits the use of "any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance," and Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)] and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act [17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5] prohibit the use of "any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud." One of the "basic aim[s] of the anti-fraud provisions [of the federal securities laws] is to 'prevent rigging of the market and to permit operation of the natural law of supply and demand.'" SEC v. First Jersey Secs., Inc., 101 F.3d 1450, 1466 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Stein, 456 F.2d 844, 850 (2d Cir. 1972)). "This prohibition with respect to manipulative activity is not confined to any particular type of manipulation, but . . . is necessarily designed to outlaw every device 'used to persuade the public that activity in a security is the reflection of a genuine demand instead of a mirage.'" SEC v. Resch-Cassin & Co., Inc., 362 F. Supp. 964, 975 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) (citation omitted).

  8. Payment of undisclosed compensation to brokers or other securities professionals to tout stocks to others for the purpose of manipulating the public market for those stocks violates the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. See, e.g., United States v. Blitz, 533 F.2d 1329, 1338 (2d Cir. 1976) (undisclosed fees to brokers for selling stock promoted by payor violates the securities laws); United States v. Koss, 506 F.2d 1103, 1109 (2d Cir. 1974) (undisclosed kickback arrangement between representatives of group seeking to unload shares of manipulated stock and individual touting the stock violate Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act); United States v. Hayutin, 398 F.2d 944, 948-49 (2d Cir. 1968) (arranging for payment of undisclosed kickbacks to brokers held to constitute participation in market manipulation scheme); United States v. Cannistraro, 734 F. Supp. 1110, 1125 (D.N.J. 1990) (paying mutual fund managers to cause mutual funds to purchase stock promoted by payor "aptly characterize[d] as a bribery scheme" that "worked a fraud on shareholders of the Funds in violation of Rule 10b-5").

  9. Sonitis willfully violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.


In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions agreed to in Sonitis' Offer.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

  1. Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Sonitis cease and desist from committing or causing any violation and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder;
  2. Pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, Sonitis be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker or dealer.

    Any reapplication for association by Sonitis will be subject to the applicable laws and regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the following: (a) any disgorgement ordered against Sonitis, whether or not the Commission has fully or partially waived payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration award related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-regulatory organization arbitration award to a customer, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order; and (d) any restitution order by a self-regulatory organization, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order.

  3. Sonitis be, and hereby is, barred from participating in any offering of penny stock, including: acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent, or other person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer or issuer for purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock; or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz




Modified: 07/20/2004