Crypto Task Force Written Input

Please find written input submissions to the Crypto Task Force below. The written input is posted without modification. We hope sharing the submissions will help encourage productive dialogue and continued engagement. Please note that the “Key Points” and “Topics” are AI generated. AI can make mistakes, and the Key Points and Topics are not a replacement for you reading the submissions. The Crypto Task Force has not reviewed these AI-generated summaries for accuracy or completeness. If you believe a Key Point or Topic is inaccurate, please email the Crypto Task Force at crypto@sec.gov. The written input provided to the SEC and posted on this page does not necessarily reflect the views of the Crypto Task Force or others in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date Written Input Topic(s) Key Points
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)

A Response by the Global Legal Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Crypto Task Force 		Custody, RFI Responses, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The LEI (Legal Entity Identifier) is a 20-character, alpha-numeric code based on the ISO 17442 standard, which uniquely identifies a legal entity and is nonproprietary.
  • The vLEI (Verifiable Legal Entity Identifier) is a cryptographically verifiable version of the LEI, providing automated and nonrepudiable verification of an organization’s identity and the persons acting on its behalf.
  • The costs of obtaining and renewing an LEI are governed by a cost-recovery model, requiring review and approval by GLEIF.
Andreessen Horowitz, a16z

Re: Recommendations Regarding a Safe Harbor and Crowdfunding Regime for Collectible Tokens (NFTs) 		RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status
  • The document recommends the creation of a safe harbor to exclude ordinary transactions of collectible tokens from federal securities laws.
  • It proposes new crowdfunding regulations for transactions of collectible tokens that may engender risks addressed by federal securities laws.
  • The document emphasizes that collectible tokens generally do not have the inherent characteristics of securities and should not be subject to federal securities laws.
Figure Markets

Submission to SEC Crypto Task Force 		Crypto Lending, Custody, Public Offerings, Regulatory Sandbox, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The SEC should clarify the security status of crypto assets like stablecoins, wrapped tokens, and NFTs to foster innovation and protect investors.
  • Tailored disclosure requirements for specific non-security crypto asset categories should be established to ensure transparency and investor protection.
  • A safe harbor provision, such as Rule 195, should be considered to encourage blockchain development within regulatory parameters.
Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA)

Re: AIMA written input to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force 		Crypto ETPs, Crypto Lending, Custody, Public Offerings, Regulatory Sandbox, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • AIMA recommends the SEC adopt a clear, principles-based regulatory approach toward crypto assets, recognizing their diverse nature and use cases.
  • AIMA urges the SEC to provide clear custody guidelines for RIAs and other institutional investors, emphasizing the need to withdraw the proposed Safeguarding Rule.
  • AIMA suggests that the SEC consider adopting a version of Rule 195 to provide clarity on when a token sale ceases to be an investment contract and when a network achieves sufficient decentralization.
Lido Labs Foundation

Re: Response to RFI of Crypto Task Force 		RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status
  • Governance tokens provide essential utility for decentralized blockchain networks and should not be classified as securities.
  • Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) are akin to warehouse receipts for commodities and do not implicate federal securities laws.
  • The SEC should provide legal clarity on the status of LSTs to ensure market certainty.
Bruce Tupper, CoinRegTech

RE: SEC Crypto 2.0 Formation of New Crypto Task Force 		Custody, RFI Responses, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The SEC should address investor protection and market structure issues involving digital asset securities facilitated by off-chain transactions on trading platforms.
  • The SEC and CFTC should jointly authorize and regulate a digital asset repository of transactions (DART) to record both on-chain and off-chain transactions and associated customer ownership.
  • The SEC should revise the Exchange Act rules to require timely reporting of all transactions deemed digital asset securities to enhance market oversight.
Ripple

Letter to the Crypto Task Force 		Custody, Regulatory Sandbox, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The SEC lacks authority over most digital assets and transactions involving them, as it can only regulate "securities" and transactions involving securities as defined by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • The application of the Howey test under the prior administration was distorted, leading to market disruption and driving innovation outside the United States.
  • The SEC should confirm that staking and yield-generating arrangements dependent on the programmatic functioning of a public, permissionless network that do not involve a definable issuer or counterparty making investment commitments are not considered securities.
Lewis Cohen, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

What We Talk About When We Talk About (Tokens) 		Public Offerings, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status
  • The absence of a clear regulatory perimeter for crypto asset activity in the U.S. has resulted in market structure distortions and challenges for price discovery in the crypto asset sector.
  • Fundraising transactions involving crypto assets intended to develop, improve, or promote a blockchain system must be registered with the Commission or exempt from registration.
  • The Commission should consider adopting safe harbor guidance for subsequent sales of crypto assets by project teams or insiders, subject to certain conditions.
Brandon Ferrick, Douro Labs LLC

Re: Responses to Commissioner Peirce’s “There Must Be Some Way Out of Here” 		Custody, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The SEC should issue interpretive guidance that decentralized oracle networks (DONs) are acceptable benchmark tools for crypto asset prices.
  • Investment funds holding digital assets could use DON-derived prices to supplement NAV calculations.
  • Broker-dealers can incorporate DON data into risk models and regulatory calculations.
Sara Hanks, CrowdCheck Law LLP

Letter to the Crypto Task Force 		Public Offerings, RFI Responses, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The document discusses the need for clear guidance on whether crypto assets fall within the definition of "security" and how they should be treated under GAAP.
  • It emphasizes that Regulation A is suitable for public offerings of tokenized traditional securities or novel crypto assets, without significant rulemaking.
  • The document highlights the importance of preemption of state laws for secondary trading of securities issued under Regulation A.