Please find written input submissions to the Crypto Task Force below. The written input is posted without modification. We hope sharing the submissions will help encourage productive dialogue and continued engagement. Please note that the “Key Points” and “Topics” are AI generated. AI can make mistakes, and the Key Points and Topics are not a replacement for you reading the submissions. The Crypto Task Force has not reviewed these AI-generated summaries for accuracy or completeness. If you believe a Key Point or Topic is inaccurate, please email the Crypto Task Force at crypto@sec.gov. The written input provided to the SEC and posted on this page does not necessarily reflect the views of the Crypto Task Force or others in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date Written Input Topic(s) Key Points
Sarah Aberg; Nova Labs, Inc. (d/b/a Helium Mobile)

Helium Draft Legislative Amendment Proposal
RFI Responses, Safe Harbor

Proposed legislative language for an amendment to the Securities Act of 1933 that would codify an exemption for certain transactions relating to DePIN. This proposed legislative language includes a definition of DePIN and the requirements for qualifying for such an exemption.

Noah Axler, Injective Labs Inc.

Letter from Injective Labs Inc.
Crypto Lending, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • Clarify that decentralized finance protocols do not constitute "exchanges" or "broker-dealers" under the Exchange Act if there is no meaningful human intermediation or custodial control.
  • Establish a safe harbor framework for DeFi trading and lending protocols that are progressing toward decentralization, modeled on Commissioner Peirce’s proposed Rule 195.
  • Exclude neutral frontend interfaces from broker-dealer rules if they merely facilitate user access to DeFi protocols without exerting control over user assets or transaction execution.
     
Dylan Lowe, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

RE: Comment on Regulatory Framework for Digital Assets and Tokenized Securities
Custody, Regulatory Sandbox, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization

  • The letter requests the SEC to issue interpretive guidance or no-action letters for tokenized insurance-backed bonds to provide legal clarity and support innovation.
  • It proposes the creation of a regulatory sandbox or pilot program for developing and testing tokenized insurance products in a controlled environment.
  • The letter recommends updating the SEC's "Framework for 'Investment Contract' Analysis of Digital Assets" to explicitly address tokenized real-world assets like insurance products.
     
Roberto Braceras, Fidelity Investments

Re: Request for Information on There Must Be Some Way Out of Here
Crypto Lending, Custody, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Trading
  • Fidelity supports the withdrawal of the Joint Staff Statement on Broker-Dealer Custody of Digital Asset Securities and recommends identifying best practices for broker-dealers that custody digital assets.
  • Fidelity urges the SEC to clarify that a broker-dealer may offer its customers a fully-paid lending program for digital assets.
  • Fidelity recommends establishing a safe harbor to support secondary trading of digital assets that are not investment contracts.
Jonathan Schmalfeld, Daniel McAvoy, and Stephen Rutenberg, Polsinelli PC

Re: Scoping Out
RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization
  • The letter urges the SEC to clarify that tokenizing or creating a cryptographically authenticated digital representation of an asset does not convert a non-securities transaction into a securities transaction.
  • TDC recommends that the SEC issue formal guidance and commence rulemaking to exempt bona fide consumer sales of goods and services (including NFTs) from securities laws where no profit or equity interest is offered and there is no contractual obligation for repayment.
  • TDC suggests that the SEC provide formal guidance on the application of securities laws to stablecoins and wrapped tokens, ensuring that these digital assets are not unnecessarily classified as securities or investment contracts.
Kecheng Lai, Knowpia Inc.

RE: Recommendation Letter - Legal Pathway for End User Distribution Tokens Prior to Rulemaking under the CLARITY Act
Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • Establishment of a provisional EUD Token Certification process for self-certifying tokens under the CLARITY Act.
  • Implementation of a No-Action Letter mechanism to confirm SEC non-enforcement for compliant EUD token projects.
  • Recognition of EUD tokens as non-securities, allowing their use for payments, rewards, and on-platform utility.
     
Matthew B. Comstock, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP

RE: Special Purpose Broker-Dealers and Financial Responsibility Matters
Custody, RFI Responses, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Trading
  • The Digital Chamber (TDC) requests the SEC to issue permanent guidance and amend existing rules to clarify how Special Purpose Broker-Dealers (SPBDs) and other broker-dealers may custody crypto asset securities and non-security crypto assets.
  • TDC advocates for a technology-neutral, principles-based approach to broker-dealer custody of crypto asset securities, ensuring exclusive control over such assets through various methods, including key sharding and multi-signature wallets.
  • TDC requests the SEC to confirm that all broker-dealers, including SPBDs, may custody non-security crypto assets and facilitate trading in both crypto asset securities and traditionally represented securities.
CoinShares International Limited

RE: It’s Time to Modernize the RIC Tax Rules
Crypto ETPs, Crypto Lending, Custody, Public Offerings, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • Ease the asset diversification requirements in Subchapter M to allow more flexibility for funds.
  • Expand the types and amounts of income that funds can receive without losing regulated investment company (RIC) status.
  • Modify the RIC excise tax distribution requirements to reduce compliance costs impacting investment returns.


 

Superstate Inc.

Response to Crypto Task Force: Digital Transfer Agent -- Moving Securities and Markets from Analog to Digital
Custody, Public Offerings, Regulatory Sandbox, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • The letter emphasizes that existing securities regulations are fully consistent with the tokenization and integration of blockchain technology within the securities markets.
  • It highlights the role of digital transfer agents in enabling the integration of registered and exempt securities by recording and tracking ownership within decentralized finance (DeFi).
  • The letter asserts that tokenized securities, supported by digital transfer agents, can improve market transparency, efficiency, and corporate governance while ensuring re
Orca Creative

Response to thCrypto Task Force’s Request for Comment: Regarding Project Open
Custody, Regulatory Sandbox, Safe Harbor, Security Status, Tokenization, Trading
  • Orca Protocol is not classified as an exchange, broker, dealer, or clearing agency under the Exchange Act.
  • Orca Protocol operates autonomously and does not involve third-party custody, discretionary control, or intermediation.
  • Orca Protocol supports a principle-based regulatory framework that emphasizes transparency, autonomy, and user control.