U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
SEC Seal
Home Previous Page
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Litigation Release No. 18915 / September 30, 2004

Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2118 / September 30, 2004

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MATTHEW M. CHIANG, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, No. C 04-4145 SI


The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has filed financial accounting fraud charges against the former President of the Asia Pacific office of Redwood City, California-based Clarent Corporation. His misconduct, and that of another Clarent executive, led Clarent, a now-bankrupt provider of Internet telephone products, to overstate its revenue by 33% for the fourth quarter of 2000, and by 23% and 39% respectively for the first two quarters of 2001.

The Commission sued Clarent's former President of Asia Pacific operations Matthew M. Chiang, 35, of Taipei, Taiwan, for allegedly inflating Clarent's revenue through fraudulent sales transactions and siphoning cash to a company in which Chiang and his family held influential positions.

The complaint alleges that, in December 2000, Chiang induced a Taiwanese technology firm to place orders of approximately $7 million for Clarent hardware and software by promising that, if the firm could not resell the products, Clarent would arrange for a company associated with Chiang's family to buy the goods (as in fact ultimately occurred). These side arrangements made it improper for Clarent to recognize revenue for the sales, but, according to the complaint, Chiang concealed the secret deal terms from Clarent's finance personnel, causing the company to report phony revenue to the public.

The Commission further alleges that, in June 2001, Chiang directed the unauthorized release of $35 million from Clarent's Asia Pacific office to the Chiang-related entity. The $35 million cash disbursement was not disclosed to Clarent's financial personnel or management. This improper payment caused Clarent to overstate its cash.

The complaint additionally alleges that, between March 2001 and June 2001, he provided customers in Asia with undisclosed rights to cancel orders or return product to Clarent on another $31 million in purported sales, making it improper for Clarent to include revenue from the orders in its publicly reported financial statements.

The Commission's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, charges Chiang with violating the antifraud, corporate reporting, books and records and internal accounting control provisions of the federal securities laws, and seeks injunctions, disgorgement, monetary penalties, and orders barring them from serving as officers or directors of public companies.

In particular, the Commission asserts claims against Chiang for violations of Sections 10(b), 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Securities Act") and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 thereunder as well as for aiding and abetting violations of Sections 10(b), 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.

In a related matter, the Commission filed a separate action against former Chief Executive Officer, Jerry S. Chang, charging him with violating, or aiding and abetting violations of, the antifraud, corporate reporting, books and records and internal control provisions of the federal securities laws. (Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-13, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 thereunder.) In addition, the complaint alleges that Chang aided and abetted Clarent's violations of certain of these provisions.

SEC Complaint in this matter



Modified: 09/30/2004