Good morning, forgive me for the delay in answering, it was not neglect, I still suffer cybercrime for not being able to take over the companies. I don't agree with this rule, investors need to be protected and the owner of the industry that is being robbed doesn't need to? I believe that both sides need to be analyzed and with coherence, I think it's missing a little sense. If the owner of the company goes bankrupt who will pay, in case I ask who will pay for the damage I suffered due to fraud, identity theft, embezzlement, perjury, patent theft, who will pay for my loss? In the meantime, I got enough evidence for everyone involved to pay within California law according to the contract. Also brokers, banks, stock exchanges and shareholders who set fire to the sales of shares that only the owners of the holding company could sell should be punished within the law, as they fostered the greatest fraud ever seen. So now it's time to repair the mistakes and invest, selling is not the solution, because everyone was harmed and I was too much, see I'm not rude, I'll go straight to the point. I also want to warn you that the fraudsters invaded my accounts and those of my husband, including CBOE's selling shares stealing our identity. So I ask for patience, I think many would not stand facing this situation, I am fighting for you shareholders to rid our economies of brokerages, banks and greedy people.
Attachment #1, Attachment #2