UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, or

[  ] Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13374

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

33-0580106

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

220 West Crest Street, Escondido, California  92025

(Address of principal executive offices)

(760) 741-2111

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.       YES [X]     NO [ ]

There were 79,612,854 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 27, 2005.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes  [ X ]   No  [   ]

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION

Form 10-Q

June 30, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1:	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets
	Consolidated Statements of Income
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Forward-looking statements
	The Company
	Recent developments
	Liquidity and capital resources
	Results of operations
	Funds from operations available to common stockholders
	Property portfolio information
	Impact of inflation
	Impact of accounting pronouncements
	Other information
Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4:	Controls and Procedures
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4:	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 6:	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE

2

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Financial Statements

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	2005		2004
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost:
Land	$ 676,548		$ 624,558
Buildings and improvements	1,142,605		1,066,725
	1,819,153		1,691,283
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(320,031	)	(301,728	)
Net real estate held for investment	1,499,122		1,389,555
Real estate held for sale, net	23,776		17,155
Net real estate	1,522,898		1,406,710
Cash and cash equivalents	1,948		2,141
Accounts receivable	3,539		4,075
Goodwill	17,206		17,206
Other assets	25,992		12,183
Total assets	$ 1,571,583		$ 1,442,315
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Distributions payable	$ 9,248		$ 9,115
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	14,323		9,579
Other liabilities	7,631		6,286
Line of credit payable	54,800		23,600
Notes payable	580,000		480,000
Total liabilities	666,002		528,580
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock and paid in capital, par value $1.00 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 5,100,000 shares issued and Outstanding	123,804		123,787
Common stock and paid in capital, par value $1.00 per share, in 2005 there were 200,000,000 shares authorized and 79,609,106 issued and outstanding and in 2004 there were 100,000,000 shares authorized and 79,301,630 issued and outstanding	1,040,144		1,038,973
Distributions in excess of net income	(258,367	)	(249,025	)
Total stockholders’ equity	905,581		913,735
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$ 1,571,583		$ 1,442,315

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

3

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended 6/30/05		Three Months Ended 6/30/04		Six Months Ended 6/30/05		Six Months Ended 6/30/04
REVENUE
Rental	$ 47,338		$ 43,535		$ 94,010		$ 84,594
Other	135		298		172		660
	47,473		43,833		94,182		85,254
EXPENSES
Interest	9,793		8,505		18,851		16,981
Depreciation and amortization	11,243		10,008		22,049		19,558
General and administrative	3,706		3,260		7,762		6,421
Property	1,019		749		1,900		1,456
Income taxes	203		191		401		344
	25,964		22,713		50,963		44,760
Income from continuing operations	21,509		21,120		43,219		40,494
Income from discontinued operations:
Real estate acquired for resale by Crest	296		2,879		1,129		6,154
Real estate held for investment	2,861		2,789		3,821		4,990
	3,157		5,668		4,950		11,144
Net income	24,666		26,788		48,169		51,638
Preferred stock cash dividends	(2,351	)	(2,982	)	(4,702	)	(5,410	)
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of preferred shares redeemed	—		(2,360	)	—		(2,360	)
Net income available to common stockholders	$ 22,315		$ 21,446		$ 43,467		$ 43,868
Basic and diluted amounts per common share:
Income from continuing operations	$ 0.24		$ 0.20		$ 0.48		$ 0.42
Net income	$ 0.28		$ 0.27		$ 0.55		$ 0.56
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	79,597,321		79,245,656		79,589,462		77,737,000
Diluted	79,676,168		79,323,180		79,667,812		77,822,186

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

4

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

(dollars in thousands)(unaudited)

	2005		2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 48,169		$ 51,638
Adjustments to net income:
Depreciation and amortization	22,049		19,558
Income from discontinued operations:
Real estate acquired for resale	(1,129	)	(6,154	)
Real estate held for investment	(3,821	)	(4,990	)
Cash from discontinued operations:
Real estate acquired for resale	(520	)	(1,838	)
Real estate held for investment	443		1,803
Investment in real estate acquired for resale	(20,340	)	(13,181	)
Intangibles acquired in connection with acquisitions of
real estate acquired for resale	(1,369	)	—
Proceeds from sales of real estate acquired for resale	11,197		57,611
Amortization of deferred stock compensation	1,084		702
Amortization of stock option costs	7		7
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and other assets	(388	)	2,537
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	1,954		(3,735	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	57,336		103,958
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales of investment properties	14,576		10,891
Acquisition of and additions to investment properties	(134,978	)	(123,116	)
Intangibles acquired in connection with acquisitions of investment properties	(8,052	)	—
Net cash used in investing activities	(128,454	)	(112,225	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings from lines of credit	175,400		145,200
Payments under lines of credit	(144,200	)	(171,600	)
Proceeds from notes issued, net of costs of $2,977 in 2005	97,023		(27	)
Proceeds from stock offerings, net of offering costs of $3,640 in 2004	—		67,960
Proceeds from preferred stock offering, net of offering costs of $3,650	—		96,350
Redemption of preferred stock	—		(68,643	)
Cash distributions to common stockholders	(52,676	)	(46,725	)
Cash dividends to preferred stockholders	(4,702	)	(4,427	)
Proceeds from other common stock issuances	80		382
Net cash provided by financing activities	70,925		18,470
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(193	)	10,203
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	2,141		4,837
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 1,948		$ 15,040

For supplemental disclosures, see note 11.

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

5

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2005

(Unaudited)

1.Management Statement

The consolidated financial statements of Realty Income Corporation (“Realty Income”, the “Company”, “we” or “our”) were prepared from our books and records without audit and include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. Certain of the 2004 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation.  Readers of this quarterly report should refer to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, which are included in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as certain disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the audited financial statements have not been included in this report.

At June 30, 2005, we owned 1,582 properties containing over 12.4 million leasable square feet in 48 states, plus an additional 13 properties owned by our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest Net Lease, Inc. (“Crest Net”). Crest Net was created to buy, own and sell properties, primarily to individual investors, many of whom are involved in tax-deferred exchanges, under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Procedures

A. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Realty Income, Crest Net and other entities for which we make operating and financial decisions (control), after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions.  All of Realty Income and Crest Net’s subsidiaries are wholly-owned.

B. We have elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under the Code. We believe we have qualified and continue to qualify as a REIT.  Under the REIT operating structure we are permitted to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders and generally will not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on such income. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, except for federal income taxes of Crest Net.

C. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, (“SFAS 141”) the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place operating leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and buildings/improvements) is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings/improvements based on our determination of the relative fair value of these assets.  Our determinations are based on a real estate appraisal for each property, generated by an independent appraisal firm, which considered estimates of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market conditions, as well as costs to execute similar leases.  In allocating the fair value to identified intangibles for above-market or below-market leases, an amount is recorded based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amount to be paid pursuant to the in-place lease and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rate for the corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease.

6

Capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets consists of the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships.  These are measured by the excess of the purchase price paid for a property, after adjusting for above or below market lease value, less the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant, determined as set forth above. If management determines that there is no tenant relationship value, the remaining value is allocated to building and improvements.  The value of in-place leases, exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases, is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recorded to revenue or expense as appropriate.

3.Retail Properties Acquired

We acquire land, buildings and improvements that are used by retail operators.

A.  During the first six months of 2005, Realty Income and Crest Net invested $166.8 million in 72 new retail properties and properties under development.  These 72 properties are located in 17 states, will contain approximately 768,000 leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average initial lease term of 17.0 years.

In comparison, during the first six months of 2004, Realty Income and Crest Net invested $133.7 million in 141 new retail properties and properties under development.

Included in the new acquisitions, during the first six months of 2005, Realty Income and Crest Net invested $85.4 million to acquire a portfolio of 33 existing properties net-leased to Rite Aid Corporation.  In accordance with SFAS 141, Realty Income recorded $8.8 million and Crest Net recorded $1.9 million as the value of in-place leases.  In addition, Realty Income recorded $756,000 and Crest Net recorded $66,000 as the value of below-market rent on these leases.  These amounts are included in “other assets” and “other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheet and are amortized over the lives of the respective leases.  Crest Net does not amortize the value of in-place leases because its properties are held for sale.

B.  During the first six months of 2005, Realty Income invested $145.1 million in 60 new retail properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.8%.  These 60 properties are located in 16 states, will contain over 673,000 leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average initial lease term of 16.9 years.  The initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed by dividing the estimated aggregate base rent for the first year of each lease by the estimated total cost of the properties.

In comparison, during the first six months of 2004, Realty Income invested $120.8 million in 127 new retail properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 9.5%.

C.  During the first six months of 2005, Crest Net invested $21.7 million in 12 new retail properties and properties under development.

In comparison, during the first six months of 2004, Crest Net invested $12.9 million in 14 new retail properties and properties under development.

D.  Crest Net’s property inventory at June 30, 2005 consisted of 13 properties with a total investment of $22.2 million and at December 31, 2004 consisted of eight properties with a total investment of $10.1 million.  These amounts are included on our consolidated balance sheets in “real estate held for sale, net.”

7

4.Credit Facilities

In June 2005, Realty Income entered into a new $300 million acquisition credit facility to replace our existing $250 million acquisition credit facility that is scheduled to expire in October 2005. Under the terms of the new credit facility, which commences in October 2005, the borrowing rate was reduced to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 65 basis points with a facility fee of 15 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 80 basis points over LIBOR. The term of the new facility expires in October 2008, unless extended as provided in the agreement.

5.Bond Offering

In March 2005, we issued $100 million in aggregate principal amount of 5-7/8% senior unsecured bonds due 2035 (the “2035 Bonds”).  The price to the investor for the 2035 Bonds was 98.296% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.998%.  The net proceeds from this offering were used to repay borrowings under our $250 million unsecured acquisition credit facility and for other general corporate purposes.  Interest on the 2035 Bonds is paid semiannually.

6.Gain on Sales of Real Estate Acquired for Resale by Crest Net

During the second quarter of 2005, Crest Net sold one property for $3.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $422,000.  In comparison, during the second quarter of 2004, Crest Net sold 16 properties for $26.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.9 million.  Crest Net’s gains on sales are reported before income taxes and are included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2005, Crest Net sold six properties for $11.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.6 million.  In comparison, during the first six months 2004, Crest Net sold 35 properties for $57.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $8.0 million.

7.Gain on Sales of Investment Properties by Realty Income

During the second quarter of 2005, we sold seven investment properties and a portion of land from one property for $8.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.7 million.  This gain is included in discontinued operations, except for $14,000 that is included in other revenue. In comparison, during the second quarter of 2004, we sold or exchanged nine investment properties for $5.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.5 million. This gain is included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2005, we sold 11 investment properties and a portion of land from one property for $14.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.5 million.  This gain is included in discontinued operations, except for $14,000 that is included in other revenue.  In comparison, during the first six months of 2004, we sold or exchanged 18 investment properties for $11.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.9 million.  This gain is included in discontinued operations.

8.Discontinued Operations

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), Realty Income’s operations from five investment properties classified as held for sale, at June 30, 2005, plus properties sold in 2005 and 2004, were reported as discontinued operations.  Their respective results of operations were reclassified to “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment.”  We classify properties as held for sale in accordance with SFAS 144.  We do not depreciate properties that are classified as held for sale.

Crest Net acquires properties with the intention of reselling them rather than holding them for investment and operating the properties.  Consequently, we classify properties acquired by Crest Net as held for sale at the date of acquisition and do not depreciate them.  In accordance with SFAS 144, the operations of Crest Net’s properties are classified as “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

8

No debt was assumed by buyers of our investment properties or repaid as a result of our investment property sales and we have elected not to allocate interest expense to discontinued operations related to real estate held for investment.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 87-24, we allocate interest expense related to borrowings specifically attributable to Crest Net properties.  The interest expense amounts allocated to the Crest Net properties are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

The following is a summary of Crest Net’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

Crest Net’s income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale	$ 422		$ 3,883		$ 1,649		$ 7,992
Rental revenue	287		614		569		1,614
Interest expense	(163	)	(164	)	(310	)	(399	)
General and administrative expense	(134	)	(122	)	(273	)	(247	)
Property expenses	(25	)	(7	)	(51	)	(15	)
Income taxes	(91	)	(1,325	)	(455	)	(2,791	)
Income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest	$ 296		$ 2,879		$ 1,129		$ 6,154

The following is a summary of Realty Income’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

Realty Income’s income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment	Three months Ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Gain on sales of investment properties	$ 2,641		$ 2,499		$ 3,463		$ 3,949
Rental revenue	256		880		555		1,911
Other revenue	—		35		1		141
Depreciation and amortization	(6	)	(226	)	(64	)	(491	)
Property expenses	(26	)	(128	)	(113	)	(249	)
Provisions for impairments	(4	)	(271	)	(21	)	(271	)
Income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment	$ 2,861		$ 2,789		$ 3,821		$ 4,990

9

The following is a summary of our total discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended 6/30/05	Three months ended 6/30/04	Six months ended 6/30/05	Six months ended 6/30/04
Income from discontinued operations:
Real estate acquired for resale by Crest	$ 296	$ 2,879	$ 1,129	$ 6,154
Real estate held for investment	2,861	2,789	3,821	4,990
Income from discontinued operations	$ 3,157	$ 5,668	$ 4,950	$ 11,144
Per common share, basic and diluted	$ 0.04	$ 0.07	$ 0.06	$ 0.14

9.Distributions Paid and Payable

A.  We pay monthly distributions to our common stockholders.  The following is a summary of the monthly cash distributions per common share paid during the first six months of 2005 and 2004.

Month	2005	2004
January	$ 0.110000	$ 0.100000
February	0.110000	0.100000
March	0.110000	0.100000
April	0.110625	0.100625
May	0.110625	0.100625
June	0.110625	0.100625
Total	$ 0.661875	$ 0.601875

At June 30, 2005, a distribution of $0.11125 per common share was payable and was paid on July 15, 2005.

B.  In May 2004 and October 2004, in aggregate, we issued a total of 5.1 million shares of 7-3/8% Monthly Income Class D preferred stock.  The first dividend for the Class D preferred stock was paid on July 15, 2004.  Beginning May 27, 2009, the Class D preferred shares are redeemable at our option for $25.00 per share.  During the first six months of 2005, we paid six monthly dividends to holders of our Class D preferred stock of $0.1536459 per share, totaling $4.7 million.  At June 30, 2004, we had recorded a dividend payable of $1.0 million, which was paid in July 2004.

C.  In May 1999, we issued 2,760,000 shares of 9-3/8% Class B cumulative redeemable preferred stock, of which 2,745,700 shares were outstanding in 2004 through June when all of the outstanding shares were redeemed.  We paid dividends to holders of our Class B preferred stock totaling $2.8 million during the first six months of 2004.

D.  In July 1999, we issued 1,380,000 shares of 9-1/2% Class C cumulative redeemable preferred stock, all of which were outstanding in 2004 through July when all of the outstanding shares were redeemed.  We paid monthly dividends to holders of our Class C preferred stock totaling $1.6 million during the first six months of 2004.

10

10.Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the number of common shares that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net income per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net income per common share computation:

	Three months ended 6/30/05	Three months ended 6/30/04	Six months ended 6/30/05	Six months ended 6/30/04
Weighted average shares used for the basic net income per share computation	79,597,321	79,245,656	79,589,462	77,737,000
Incremental shares from the assumed exercise of stock options	78,847	77,524	78,350	85,186
Adjusted weighted average shares used for diluted net income per share computation	79,676,168	79,323,180	79,667,812	77,822,186

No stock options were anti-dilutive for the three or six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

11.  Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

Interest paid during the first six months of 2005 was $16.5 million and for the first six months of 2004 was $16.0 million.

Interest capitalized to properties under development in the first six months of 2005 was $625,000 and in the first six months of 2004 was $274,000.

Income taxes paid by Realty Income and Crest Net in the first six months of 2005 totaled $1.1 million and in the first six months of 2004 totaled $5.1 million.

The following non-cash investing and financing activities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:

A.       Restricted stock grants resulted in the following (dollars in thousands):

		2005			2004
Common stock and paid in capital	$ 7,572			$ 4,282
Common stock and paid in capital, deferred stock compensation	(7,572		)	(4,282		)

B.        In 2005, accrued costs on properties under development resulted in buildings and accounts payable being increased by $3.4 million.

C.        Distributions payable on our balance sheets is comprised of accruals for the following (dollars in thousands):

		6/30/05	12/31/04
Common stock distributions	$ 8,856		$ 8,723
Preferred stock dividends	392		392

D.       In 2004, we exchanged one of our properties for a different property that was leased to the same tenant.  As part of this transaction, land was reduced by $160,000, building was increased by $78,000, accumulated depreciation was decreased by $82,000 and no gain was recognized.

11

12.Segment Information

We evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions on an industry by industry basis. For financial reporting purposes, we have grouped our properties into 31 industry and activity segments (including properties owned by Crest Net that are grouped together as a segment).  All of the properties are incorporated into one of the applicable segments. Because almost all of our leases require the tenant to pay operating expenses, revenue is the only component of segment profit and loss we measure.

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the properties owned by us, classified according to the industry and activities of the respective properties as of June 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands):

Revenue	Three months ended 6/30/05	Three months ended 6/30/04	Six months ended 6/30/05	Six months ended 6/30/04
Segment rental revenue:
Automotive parts	$ 1,612	$ 1,606	$ 3,290	$ 3,278
Automotive service	3,731	3,215	7,441	6,388
Automotive tire services	3,472	3,383	7,174	6,751
Child care	6,260	6,236	12,381	12,576
Convenience stores	8,908	8,828	17,791	15,675
Drug stores	1,540	61	2,335	122
Health and fitness	1,798	1,719	3,583	3,369
Home furnishings	1,917	1,804	3,711	3,596
Motor vehicle dealerships	1,220	52	2,248	63
Restaurants	4,259	4,043	8,549	8,058
Sporting goods	1,687	1,483	3,374	2,966
Theaters	1,529	1,513	3,189	3,020
19 non-reportable segments (1)	9,405	9,592	18,944	18,732
Other revenue	135	298	172	660
Total revenue	$ 47,473	$ 43,833	$ 94,182	$ 85,254

(1) Crest Net’s revenues appear in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

12

Assets as of:	6/30/05	12/31/04
Net real estate
Automotive parts	$ 40,248	$ 41,153
Automotive service	108,267	109,836
Automotive tire services	131,195	133,296
Child care	105,946	109,523
Convenience stores	335,195	321,746
Drug stores	66,379	2,320
Health and fitness	68,400	58,647
Home furnishings	56,103	57,021
Motor vehicle dealerships	56,290	40,786
Restaurants	127,697	116,534
Sporting goods	58,724	59,535
Theaters	60,051	51,837
19 non-reportable segments	308,403	304,476
Total net real estate	1,522,898	1,406,710
Non-real estate assets	48,685	35,605
Total assets	$ 1,571,583	$ 1,442,315

13.Stock Option Plan

Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and beginning in 2002 started expensing the costs for all stock option awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002.

For the second quarter and first six months of 2005 and 2004, the provisions of Statement No. 123 had no impact on net income available to common stockholders or on basic and diluted earnings per share.

14.Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions that we believe are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. We believe the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated statements taken as a whole.

At June 30, 2005, we have committed to pay estimated unfunded development costs of $45.3 million on properties under development. We also have contingent payments for tenant improvements and leasing costs of $702,000.

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including documents incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. When used in this quarterly report, the words “estimated”, “anticipated” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about Realty Income Corporation, including, among other things:

•Our anticipated growth strategies;

•Our intention to acquire additional properties and the timing of these acquisitions;

•Our intention to sell properties and the timing of these property sales;

•Our intention to re-lease vacant properties;

•Anticipated trends in our business, including trends in the market for long-term net-leases of freestanding, single-tenant retail properties;

•Future expenditures for development projects; and

•Profitability of our subsidiary, Crest Net Lease, Inc.

13

Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  In particular, some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are:

•Our continued qualification as a real estate investment trust;

•General business and economic conditions;

•Competition;

•Fluctuating interest rates;

•Access to debt and equity capital markets;

•Other risks inherent in the real estate business including tenant defaults, potential liability relating to environmental matters and illiquidity of real estate investments;

•Impairments in the value of our real estate assets;

•Changes in the tax laws of the United States of America;

•The outcome of any legal proceedings to which we are a party; and,

•Acts of terrorism and war.

Additional factors that may cause risks and uncertainties include those discussed in the sections entitled “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that this quarterly report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.  We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this quarterly report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events discussed in this quarterly report might not occur.

THE COMPANY

Realty Income Corporation, The Monthly Dividend Company^®, is a Maryland corporation organized to operate as an equity real estate investment trust, or REIT.  Our primary business objective is to generate dependable monthly cash distributions from a consistent and predictable level of funds from operations, or FFO, per share.  The monthly distributions are supported by the cash flow from our portfolio of retail properties leased to regional and national retail chains.  We have in-house acquisition, leasing, legal, retail and real estate research, portfolio management and capital markets expertise. Over the past 36 years, Realty Income and its predecessors have been acquiring and owning freestanding retail properties that generate rental revenue under long-term lease agreements (primarily 15- to 20-years).

14

In addition, we seek to increase distributions to stockholders and FFO per share through both active portfolio management and the acquisition of additional properties. Our portfolio management focus includes:

•Contractual rent increases on existing leases;

•Rent increases at the termination of existing leases when market conditions permit; and

•The active management of our property portfolio, including re-leasing of vacant properties and selective sales of properties.

Our acquisition of additional properties adheres to a focused strategy of primarily acquiring properties that are:

•Freestanding, single-tenant, retail locations;

•Leased to regional and national retail chains; and

•Leased under long-term, net-lease agreements.

At June 30, 2005, we owned a diversified portfolio:

•Of 1,582 retail properties;

•With an occupancy rate of 98.2%, or 1,553 properties occupied of the 1,582 properties in the portfolio;

•Leased to 98 different retail chains doing business in 30 separate retail industries;

•Located in 48 states;

•With over 12.4 million square feet of leasable space; and

•With an average leasable retail space per property of 7,900 square feet.

Of the 1,582 properties in the portfolio, 1,577, or 99.7%, are single-tenant, retail properties and the remaining five are multi-tenant properties. At June 30, 2005, 1,549, or 98.2%, of the 1,577 single-tenant properties were leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding extension options) of approximately 12.0 years.

In addition, our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest Net Lease, Inc., owned 13 properties with a total investment of $22.2 million at June 30, 2005. These properties are classified as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet.  Crest Net was created to buy, own and sell properties, primarily to individual investors, many of whom are involved in tax-deferred exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

We typically acquire retail store properties under long-term leases with retail chain store operators. These transactions generally provide capital to owners of retail real estate and retail chains for expansion or other corporate purposes. Our acquisition and investment activities are concentrated in well-defined target markets and generally focus on retailers providing goods and services that satisfy basic consumer needs.

Our net-lease agreements generally:

•Are for initial terms of 15 to 20 years;

•Require the tenant to pay minimum monthly rents and property operating expenses (taxes, insurance and maintenance); and

•Provide for future rent increases (typically subject to ceilings) based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed increases, or to a lesser degree, additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level.

We believe that owning an actively managed, diversified portfolio of retail properties under long-term, net leases produces consistent and predictable income.  Under a net-lease agreement, the tenant agrees to pay monthly rent and property operating expenses (taxes, maintenance and insurance) plus, typically, future rent increases (generally subject to ceilings) based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed

15

increases, or to a lesser degree, additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level. We believe that owning a portfolio of properties under long-term leases, coupled with the tenant’s responsibility for property expenses, generally produces a more predictable income stream than many other types of real estate portfolios, while continuing to offer the potential for growth in rental income.

We generally provide sale-leaseback financing to less than investment grade retail chains. From 1970 through December 31, 2004, we acquired and leased back to regional and national retail chains 1,678 properties (including 171 properties that have been sold) and have collected approximately 98% of the original contractual rent obligations on those properties. We believe that within this market we can achieve an attractive risk-adjusted return on the financing we provide to retailers.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Credit Facilities

In June 2005, Realty Income entered into a new $300 million acquisition credit facility to replace our existing $250 million acquisition credit facility that is scheduled to expire in October 2005. Under the terms of the new credit facility, which commences in October 2005, the borrowing rate was reduced to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 65 basis points with a facility fee of 15 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 80 basis points over LIBOR. The term of the new facility expires in October 2008, unless extended as provided in the agreement.

Issuance of 30-Year Bonds

In March 2005, Realty Income issued $100 million in aggregate principal amount of 30-year, 5-7/8% senior unsecured bonds due 2035.  The price to the investor for the bonds was 98.296% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.998%.  The securities are rated BBB by Fitch Ratings, Baa2 by Moody’s Investors Service and BBB by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group.  The net proceeds from the offering were used to repay borrowings under our $250 million unsecured acquisition credit facility and for other general corporate purposes.

One Billion Dollars of Dividends Paid

With the payment of the January 2005 dividend, Realty Income and its predecessors have paid in excess of $1 billion in common stock dividends since inception. In addition, since October 1994 when we began trading on the New York Stock Exchange, shareholders have enjoyed regular increases in the amount of the dividend. The annualized dividend amount has grown from $0.90 per share in 1994 to $1.335 per share in July 2005, an increase of 48.3%.  The July 2005 annualized dividend amount increased by 9.9% as compared to the July 2004 annualized dividend amount of $1.215 per share.

Acquisitions During The Second Quarter Of 2005

Realty Income and Crest Net Acquisitions

Realty Income and Crest Net invested $74.4 million in 38 new properties and properties under development. These 38 properties are located in eight states and are 100% leased with an initial average lease term of 17.9 years.

Realty Income Acquisitions

Realty Income invested $61.8 million in 29 new properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.9%. These 29 properties are located in seven states, are 100% leased with an initial average lease term of 17.8 years and will contain over 308,000 leasable square feet.  The 29 new properties acquired by Realty Income are net-leased to five different retail chains in the convenience store, drug store, health and fitness, restaurant and theater industries. At June 30, 2005, eight new properties acquired during the second quarter of 2005 were leased and under contract for

16

development by the tenant (with development costs funded by Realty Income or Crest Net) with rent scheduled to begin at various times during the next 12 months.

The initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed as estimated contractual net operating income (in a net-leased property this is equal to the base rent or, in the case of properties under development, the estimated base rent under the lease) for the first year of each lease, divided by the estimated total costs. Since it is possible that a tenant could default on the payment of contractual rent, we cannot assure you that the actual return on the funds invested will remain at the percentages listed above.

Crest Net Acquisitions

Crest Net invested $12.6 million in nine new retail properties and properties under development.

Acquisitions During The First Six Months Of 2005

Realty Income and Crest Net Acquisitions

Realty Income and Crest Net invested $166.8 million in 72 new properties and properties under development. These 72 properties are located in 17 states and are 100% leased with an initial average lease term of 17.0 years.

Acquisition of 33 Rite Aid Properties

Included in the new acquisitions is $85.4 million we invested to acquire a portfolio of 33 Rite Aid drug store properties.  Of the 33 properties acquired, 28 were purchased by Realty Income for an aggregate of $72.7 million and five were purchased by Crest Net Lease for an aggregate of $12.7 million.  The properties are all existing stores that are net-leased to the Rite Aid Corporation with an average lease term of 14.2 years.

Realty Income Acquisitions

Realty Income invested $145.1 million in 60 new properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.8%. These 60 properties are located in 16 states, are 100% leased with an initial average lease term of 16.9 years and will contain over 673,000 leasable square feet.  The 60 new properties acquired by Realty Income are net-leased to six different retail chains in the convenience store, drug store, health and fitness, motor vehicle dealership, restaurant and theater industries. At June 30, 2005, 11 new properties acquired during 2005 were leased and under contract for development by the tenant (with development costs funded by Realty Income or Crest Net) with rent scheduled to begin at various times during the next 12 months.

Crest Net Acquisitions

Crest Net invested $21.7 million in 12 new retail properties and properties under development

Investments in Existing Properties

In the second quarter of 2005, we capitalized costs of $638,000 on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $56,000 for re-leasing costs and $582,000 for building improvements.

In the first six months of 2005, we capitalized costs of $1.3 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $400,000 for re-leasing costs and $864,000 for building improvements.

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders

Net income available to common stockholders was $22.3 million in the second quarter of 2005 versus $21.4 million in the same quarter of 2004, an increase of $900,000. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.28 per share in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to $0.27 per share in the same quarter of 2004.

17

Net income available to common stockholders was $43.5 million in the first six months of 2005 versus $43.9 million in the same quarter of 2004, a decrease of $400,000. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.55 per share in the first six months of 2005 as compared to $0.56 per share in the same quarter of 2004.

The calculation to determine net income available to common stockholders includes gains from the sale of properties. The amount of gains varies from period to period based on the timing of property sales and can significantly impact net income available to common stockholders.

The gain recognized from the sales of investment properties during the second quarter of 2005 was $2.7 million as compared to $2.5 million for the second quarter of 2004.  The gain recognized from the sales of properties acquired for resale during the second quarter of 2005 was $422,000 as compared to $3.9 million for the second quarter of 2004.

The gain recognized from the sales of investment properties during the first six months of 2005 was $3.5 million as compared to $3.9 million for the first six months of 2004.  The gain recognized from the sales of properties acquired for resale during the first six months of 2005 was $1.6 million as compared to $8.0 million for the first six months of 2004

Funds from Operations (FFO)

In the second quarter of 2005, our FFO increased by $1.7 million, or 5.8%, to $30.9 million versus $29.2 million in the second quarter of 2004.  On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $0.39 in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $0.37 for the second quarter of 2004, an increase of $0.02, or 5.4%.

In the first six months of 2005, our FFO increased by $2.1 million, or 3.5%, to $62.0 million versus $59.9 million in the first six months of 2004.  On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $0.78 in the first six months of 2005 compared to $0.77 for the first six months of 2004, an increase of $0.01, or 1.3%.

See our discussion of FFO later in this section for a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to FFO.

Crest Net Property Sales

During the second quarter of 2005, Crest Net sold one property from its inventory for an aggregate of $3.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $422,000.  Crest Net’s gains are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

During the first six months of 2005, Crest Net sold six properties from its inventory for an aggregate of $11.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.6 million.

Crest Net’s Property Inventory

Crest Net’s property inventory at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 totaled $22.2 million and $10.1 million, respectively.  These amounts are included in “real estate held for sale, net”, on our consolidated balance sheet.

The financial statements of Crest Net are consolidated into Realty Income’s financial statements. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Sales of Investment Properties by Realty Income

During the second quarter of 2005, we sold seven properties and a portion of land from one property for an aggregate of $8.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.7 million. The seven properties consisted of one automotive service location, three child care locations, one consumer electronics store, one convenience store and one private education facility.  This gain is included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment”, except for $14,000 that is included in other revenue.  The net

18

proceeds from the sale of these properties were used to repay outstanding indebtedness on our credit facility and to invest in new properties.

During the first six months of 2005, we sold 11 properties and a portion of land from one property for an aggregate of $14.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.5 million. The 11 properties consisted of one automotive service location, one automotive tire service location, four child care locations, one consumer electronics store, one convenience store, one motor vehicle dealership, one private education facility and one restaurant.  This gain is included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment”, except for $14,000 that is included in other revenue.  The net proceeds from the sale of these properties were used to repay outstanding indebtedness on our credit facility and to invest in new properties.

Increases in Monthly Distributions to Common Stockholders

We continue our 36-year policy of paying distributions monthly.  Monthly distributions per share were increased by $0.000625 in April 2005 to $0.110625 and in July 2005 to $0.11125.  The increase in July 2005 was our 31st consecutive quarterly increase and the 34th increase in the amount of our dividend since our listing on the NYSE in 1994. In the first six months of 2005, we paid three monthly cash distributions in the amount of $0.11 and three monthly cash distributions in the amount if $0.110625 totaling $0.661875. In June 2005 and July 2005, we declared distributions of $0.11125 per share, which were paid on July 15, 2005 and will be paid on August 15, 2005, respectively.

The monthly distribution of $0.11125 per share represents a current annualized distribution of $1.335 per share, and an annualized distribution yield of approximately 5.3% based on the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE of $25.06 on July 27, 2005. Although we expect to continue our policy of paying monthly distributions, we cannot guarantee that we will maintain the current level of distributions, that we will continue our pattern of increasing distributions per share, or what the actual distribution yield will be in any future period.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Reserves

Realty Income is organized to operate as an equity REIT that acquires and leases properties and distributes to stockholders, in the form of monthly cash distributions, a substantial portion of its net cash flow generated from leases on its retail properties. We intend to retain an appropriate amount of cash as working capital. At June 30, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $1.9 million.

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash provided from operating activities and borrowing capacity is sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. We intend, however, to use additional sources of capital to fund property acquisitions and to repay our credit facility.

$250 Million Bank Credit Facility

We have a $250 million revolving, unsecured credit facility that expires in October 2005. Realty Income’s current investment grade credit ratings provide for financing under the $250 million credit facility at the London Interbank Offered Rate, commonly referred to as LIBOR, plus 90 basis points with a facility fee of 20 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 110 basis points over LIBOR.  At July 27, 2005, we had a borrowing capacity of $188.8 million available on our credit facility and an outstanding balance of $61.2 million at an effective interest rate of 4.3%.

The credit facility is expected to be used to acquire additional retail properties and for other corporate purposes.  Any additional borrowings will increase our exposure to interest rate risk.

19

$300 Million Bank Credit Facility

In June 2005, Realty Income entered into a new $300 million acquisition credit facility to replace our existing $250 million acquisition credit facility that is scheduled to expire in October 2005. Under the terms of the new credit facility, which commences in October 2005, the borrowing rate was reduced to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 65 basis points with a facility fee of 15 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 80 basis points over LIBOR. The term of the new facility expires in October 2008, unless extended as provided in the agreement.

Mortgage Debt

We have no mortgage debt on any of our properties.

Universal Shelf Registration of $800 Million

In February 2004, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC registering the issuance, from time to time, of up to $800 million in aggregate value of common stock, preferred stock and debt securities.  At July 27, 2005, $500.4 million remained available for issuance under our universal shelf registration statement.

Conservative Capital Structure

We believe that our stockholders are best served by a conservative capital structure. Therefore, we seek to maintain a conservative debt level on our balance sheet and solid interest and fixed charge coverage ratios. At July 27, 2005, our total outstanding credit facility borrowings and outstanding notes were $641.2 million or approximately 23.2% of our total market capitalization of $2.76 billion. We define our total market capitalization at July 27, 2005 as the sum of:

•Shares of our common stock outstanding of 79,612,854 multiplied by the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NYSE of $25.06 per share, or $2.0 billion;

•Aggregate liquidation value of the Class D preferred stock of $127.5 million;

•Outstanding borrowings of $61.2 million on our credit facility; and

•Outstanding notes of $580.0 million.

Historically, we have met our long-term capital needs through the issuance of common stock, preferred stock and long-term unsecured notes. Over the long term, we believe that the majority of our future securities issuances should be in the form of common stock, however, we may issue additional preferred stock or debt securities from time to time. We may issue common stock when we believe that our share price is at a level that allows for the proceeds of any offering to be accretively invested into additional properties. In addition, we may issue common stock to permanently finance properties that were financed by our credit facility or debt securities. However, we cannot assure you that we will have access to the capital markets at terms that are acceptable to us.

Credit Agency Ratings

We are currently assigned investment grade corporate credit ratings, on our senior unsecured notes, from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Rating Group. Currently, Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB, Moody’s has assigned a rating of Baa2 and Standard & Poor’s has assigned a rating of BBB to our senior notes. All of these ratings have been assigned a “stable” outlook.

We have also been assigned investment grade credit ratings from the same rating agencies on our preferred stock. Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB-, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. has assigned a rating of Baa3 and Standard & Poor’s Rating Group has assigned a rating of BBB- to our preferred stock.  All of these ratings have been assigned a “stable” outlook.

The credit ratings assigned to us could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition.

20

Notes Outstanding

In March 2005, we issued $100 million of 5-7/8%, 30-year, senior unsecured bonds due 2035.  Interest on these bonds is paid semiannually.

In November 2003, we issued $150 million of 5-1/2%, 12-year, senior unsecured notes due 2015.  Interest on these notes is paid semiannually.

In March 2003, we issued $100 million of 5-3/8%, 10-year, senior unsecured notes due 2013.  Interest on these notes is paid semiannually.

In January 1999, we issued $20 million of 8% senior unsecured notes due 2009. Interest on these notes is paid semiannually.

In October 1998, we issued $100 million of 8-1/4% senior unsecured notes due 2008. Interest on these notes is paid monthly.

In May 1997, we issued $110 million of 7-3/4% senior unsecured notes due 2007. Interest on these notes is paid semiannually.

All of these notes contain various covenants, including: (i) a limitation on incurrence of any debt which would cause our debt to total assets ratio to exceed 60%; (ii) a limitation on incurrence of any secured debt which would cause our secured debt to total assets ratio to exceed 40%; (iii) a limitation on incurrence of any debt which would cause our debt service coverage ratio to be less than 1.5 times; and (iv) the maintenance at all times of total unencumbered assets not less than 150% of our outstanding unsecured debt. We have been in compliance with these covenants since each of the notes were issued.

All of our outstanding notes have fixed interest rates.  Our credit facility interest rate is variable.

The following table of obligations summarizes the maturity of each of our obligations as of June 30, 2005 (dollars in millions):

Table of Obligations

Year of Maturity	Credit Facility (1)	Notes	Interest (2)	Other (3)	Totals
2005	$ 54.8	$ —	$ 19.7	$ 46.0	$ 120.5
2006	—	—	37.9	—	37.9
2007	—	110.0	32.3	—	142.3
2008	—	100.0	28.3	—	128.3
2009	—	20.0	19.6	—	39.6
Thereafter	—	350.0	213.7	—	563.7
Totals	$ 54.8	$ 580.0	$ 351.5	$ 46.0	$ 1,032.3

(1)   The credit facility balance was $61.2 million as of July 27, 2005.

(2)   Interest on credit facility and notes has been calculated based on outstanding balances as of June 30, 2005 through their respective maturity dates.

(3)   Other consists of $45.3 million of estimated unfunded costs on properties under development and $702,000 of contingent payments for tenant improvements and leasing costs.

Our credit facility and note obligations are unsecured.  Accordingly, we have not pledged any assets as collateral for these obligations.

21

Preferred Stock Outstanding

In May and October 2004, we issued an aggregate of 5.1 million shares of 7.375% Class D cumulative redeemable preferred stock.  Beginning May 27, 2009, shares of Class D preferred stock are redeemable at our option for $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.  Dividends on shares of Class D preferred are paid monthly in arrears.

No Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements or Unconsolidated Investments

Realty Income and its subsidiaries have no unconsolidated or off-balance sheet investments in “variable interest entities” or off-balance sheet financing, nor do we engage in trading activities involving energy or commodity contracts or other derivative instruments.

As we have no joint ventures, off-balance sheet entities, or mandatory redeemable preferred stock, our financial position or results of operations are currently not affected by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.

Distributions

Distributions are paid to our common stockholders and Class D preferred stockholders on a monthly basis if and when declared by our Board of Directors. The Class D preferred stockholders receive cumulative distributions at a rate of 7.375% per annum on the $25 per share liquidation preference (equivalent to $1.84375 per annum per share).

In order to maintain our tax status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to distribute dividends to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains) and we are subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income (including net capital gains). In 2004, our cash distributions totaled $106.5 million, or approximately 107.8% of our estimated REIT taxable income of $98.8 million. Our estimated REIT taxable income reflects non-cash deductions for depreciation and amortization. We intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders that are sufficient to meet this distribution requirement and that will reduce our exposure to income taxes. During the first six months of 2005, our cash distributions to common stockholders totaled $52.7 million, representing 85.0% of our funds from operations available to common stockholders of $62.0 million.

Future distributions will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent on, among other things, our results of operations, FFO, cash flow from operations, financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, our debt service requirements and any other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our credit facility contains financial covenants that could limit the amount of distributions payable by us in the event of a deterioration in our results of operations or financial condition, and which prohibit the payment of distributions on the common or preferred stock in the event that we fail to pay when due (subject to any applicable grace period) any principal or interest on borrowings under our credit facility.

Distributions of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes, generally will be taxable to stockholders as ordinary income, except to the extent that we recognize capital gains and declare a capital gains dividend or that such amounts constitute “qualified dividend income” subject to a reduced rate of tax. The maximum tax rate of non-corporate taxpayers for “qualified dividend income” has generally been reduced to 15% (for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002). In general, dividends payable by REITs are not eligible for the reduced tax rate on corporate dividends, except to the extent the REIT’s dividends are attributable to dividends received from taxable corporations (such as our taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest Net), to income that was subject to tax at the corporate or

22

REIT level (for example, if we distribute taxable income that we retained and paid tax on in the prior taxable year) or, as discussed above, dividends properly designated by us as “capital gain dividends.” Distributions in excess of earnings and profits generally will be treated as a non-taxable reduction in the stockholders’ basis in the stock. Distributions above that basis, generally, will be taxable as a capital gain. Approximately 4.7% of the distributions, made or deemed to have been made in 2004, to our common stockholders were classified as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. We are unable to predict the portion of future distributions that may be classified as a return of capital.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our consolidated financial statements are the basis for our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Preparing our consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. We believe that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner and in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements according to the rules and guidelines set forth by GAAP, many subjective judgments must be made with regard to critical accounting policies. One of these judgments is our estimate for useful lives in determining depreciation expense for our properties. Depreciation of buildings and improvements is computed using the straight–line method over an estimated useful life of 25 years. If we use a shorter or longer estimated useful life it could have a material impact on our results of operations. We believe that 25 years is an appropriate estimate of useful life. No depreciation has been recorded on Crest Net’s properties because they are held for sale.

Another significant judgment that must be made is if and when impairment losses should be taken on our properties when events or change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Generally, a provision is made for impairment loss if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. If a property is held for sale, it is carried at the lower of carrying cost or estimated fair value, less costs to sell. The carrying value of our real estate is the largest component of our consolidated balance sheet. If events should occur that require us to reduce the carrying value of our real estate by recording provisions for impairment losses, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.

The following is a comparison of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 to the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.

Rental revenue

Rental revenue was $47.3 million for the second quarter of 2005 versus $43.5 million for the second quarter of 2004, an increase of $3.8 million, or 8.7%.  The increase in rental revenue in the second quarter of 2005 is attributable to:

•The 60 retail properties acquired by Realty Income in 2005, which generated $1.8 million in the second quarter;

•The 172 retail properties acquired by Realty Income in 2004, which generated $4.2 million in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2004, an increase of $1.7 million;

23

•Same store rents generated on 1,283 properties during the second quarters of 2005 and 2004 increased by $395,000, or 1.0%, to $39.6 million from $39.2 million.  These properties were leased during all of both quarters;

•An increase in straight-line rent of $171,000 in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the second quarter of 2004; and

•A decrease of $361,000 relating to the aggregate of (i) development properties acquired before 2004 that started paying rent in 2004, (ii) properties that were vacant during part of 2005 or 2004 and (iii) lease termination settlements.  These items totaled $948,000 in aggregate in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $1.3 million in the same quarter of 2004.

Rental revenue was $94.0 million for the first six months of 2005 versus $84.6 million for the first six months of 2004, an increase of $9.4 million, or 11.1%.  The increase in rental revenue in the first six months of 2005 is attributable to:

•The 60 retail properties acquired by Realty Income in 2005, which generated $2.6 million in the first six months;

•The 172 retail properties acquired by Realty Income in 2004, which generated $8.4 million in the first six months of 2005 compared to $3.0 million in the first six months of 2004, an increase of $5.4 million;

•Same store rents generated on 1,283 properties during the first six months of 2005 and 2004 increased by $671,000, or 0.9%, to $79.2 million from $78.5 million.  These properties were leased during all of both periods;

•An increase in straight-line rent of $987,000 in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the first six months of 2004; and

•A decrease of $337,000 relating to the aggregate of (i) development properties acquired before 2004 that started paying rent in 2004, (ii) properties that were vacant during part of 2005 or 2004 and (iii) lease termination settlements.  These items totaled $1.9 million in aggregate in the first six months of 2005 compared to $2.2 million in the same period of 2004.

Of the 1,582 properties in the portfolio at June 30, 2005, 1,577, or 99.7%, are single-tenant properties and the remaining five are multi-tenant properties. Of the 1,577 single-tenant properties, 1,549, or 98.2%, were net leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding rights to extend a lease at the option of the tenant) of approximately 12.0 years at June 30, 2005. Of our 1,549 leased single-tenant properties, 1,424, or 91.9%, were under leases that provide for increases in rents through:

•Base rent increases tied to a consumer price index with adjustment ceilings;

•Fixed increases;

•To a lesser degree, overage rent based on a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales; or

•A combination of two or more of the above rent provisions.

Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue, was $88,000 in the second quarter of 2005 and $99,000 in the second quarter of 2004. Percentage rent was $199,000 in the first six months of 2005 and $409,000 in the first six months of 2004. Percentage rent in the second quarter and first six months of 2005 was less than 1% of rental revenue and we anticipate percentage rent to be less than 1% of rental revenue in 2005.

Our portfolio of retail real estate, leased primarily to regional and national chains under net leases, continues to perform well and provides dependable lease revenue supporting the payment of monthly dividends to our stockholders.  At June 30, 2005, our portfolio of 1,582 retail properties was 98.2% leased with 29 properties available for lease, one of which is a multi-tenant property. As of July 27, 2005, transactions to lease or sell 10 of the 29 properties that were available for lease at June 30, 2005 were underway or completed. We anticipate these transactions will be completed during the next six months, although we cannot guarantee that all of these properties can be leased or sold within this period. It has been our experience that approximately 1% to 3% of our property portfolio will be unleased at any given time, however, we cannot assure you that the number of properties available for lease will not exceed these levels.

24

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $1.3 million higher in the second quarter of 2005 than in the second quarter of 2004. Interest expense was $1.9 million higher in the first six months of 2005 than in the first six months of 2004.  Interest expense increased in 2005 primarily due to higher average outstanding balances, which was partially offset by slightly lower interest rates. The following is a summary of the components of our interest expense (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Interest on our credit facility and notes	$ 9,654		$ 8,078		$ 18,308		$ 16,208
Interest included in discontinued operations from real estate acquired for resale by Crest	(163	)	(164	)	(310	)	(399	)
Amortization of settlements on treasury lock agreements	189		189		378		378
Credit facility commitment fees	127		127		253		253
Amortization of credit facility origination costs and deferred bond financing costs	433		408		847		815
Interest capitalized	(447	)	(133	)	(625	)	(274	)
Interest expense	$ 9,793		$ 8,505		$ 18,851		$ 16,981

Credit facilities and notes outstanding	Three months ended 6/30/05	Three months ended 6/30/04	Six months ended 6/30/05	Six months ended 6/30/04
Average outstanding balances (in thousands)	$ 598,402	$ 495,766	$ 570,364	$ 500,743
Average interest rates	6.47%	6.55%	6.47%	6.51%

At July 27, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on our:

•Credit facility borrowings of $61.2 million was 4.3%;

•Notes payable of $580 million was 6.5%; and

•Combined outstanding credit facility and notes of $641.2 million was 6.3%.

Interest Coverage Ratio

For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, our interest coverage ratio was 4.4 times and 5.2 times, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, our interest coverage ratio was 4.5 times and 5.1 times, respectively.  Interest coverage ratio is calculated as: the interest coverage amount (calculated in the following table) divided by interest expense, including interest attributable to discontinued operations. We consider interest coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a company’s ability to meet its interest expense obligations. Our calculation of interest coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures.

25

The following is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to our interest coverage amount (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Net cash provided by operating activities	$ 21,868		$ 51,651		$ 57,336		$ 103,958
Interest expense	9,793		8,505		18,851		16,981
Interest expense included in discontinued operations (1)	163		164		310		399
Income taxes	203		191		401		344
Income taxes included in discontinued operations (1)	91		1,325		455		2,791
Investment in real estate acquired for resale (1)(2)	12,569		2,815		21,709		13,181
Proceeds from sales of real estate acquired for resale (1)	(3,451	)	(26,563	)	(11,197	)	(57,611	)
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale (1)	422		3,883		1,649		7,992
Gain on sale of investment property, included in other revenue	(14	)	—		(14	)	—
Provision for impairment, included in property expense	47		—		47		—
Amortization of deferred stock compensation	(547	)	(354	)	(1,084	)	(702	)
Amortization of stock option costs	(3	)	(3	)	(7	)	(7	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and other assets	2,030		(1,139	)	388		(2,537	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	391		4,504		(1,954	)	3,735
Interest coverage amount	$ 43,562		$ 44,979		$ 86,890		$ 88,524
Divided by interest expense (3)	$ 9,956		$ 8,669		$ 19,161		$ 17,380
Interest coverage ratio	4.4		5.2		4.5		5.1

(1)Crest Net activities.

(2)The 2005 amount includes intangibles recorded in connection with acquisitions of real estate acquired for resale.

(3)Includes interest expense recorded to “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, our fixed charge coverage ratio was 3.5 times and 3.9 times, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, our fixed charge coverage ratio was 3.6 times and 3.9 times, respectively.  Fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated in the same manner as interest coverage ratio, except that preferred stock dividends are also added to the denominator. We consider fixed charge coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a company’s ability to make its interest and preferred stock dividend payments. Our calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures.

26

Interest coverage amount divided by interest expense plus preferred stock dividends (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended 6/30/05	Three months ended 6/30/04	Six months ended 6/30/05	Six months ended 6/30/04
Interest coverage amount	$ 43,562	$ 44,979	$ 86,890	$ 88,524
Divided by interest expense plus preferred stock dividends (1)	$ 12,307	$ 11,651	$ 23,863	$ 22,790
Fixed charge coverage ratio	3.5	3.9	3.6	3.9

(1) Includes interest expense recorded to “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

Depreciation and Amortization

For the second quarter of 2005, depreciation and amortization was $11.2 million as compared to $10.0 million in the second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, depreciation was $22.0 million as compared to $19.6 million in the first six months of 2004.  The increase in depreciation and amortization in 2005 was due to the acquisition of properties in 2005 and 2004, which was partially offset by property sales in these years.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $400,000 to $3.7 million in the second quarter of 2005 versus $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2004.  In the second quarter of 2005, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue increased to 7.8% as compared to 7.4% in the second quarter of 2004.

General and administrative expenses increased by $1.3 million to $7.7 million in the first six months of 2005 versus $6.4 million in the first six months of 2004.  In the first six months of 2005, as a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses increased to 8.2% as compared to 7.5% in the first six months of 2004.

General and administrative expenses increased in 2005 primarily due to increases in accounting fees, increases in payroll and employee benefit costs, and increases in costs related to corporate governance, including costs of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

As our property portfolio has grown and continues to grow, we have increased, and anticipate that we will continue to gradually increase the level of our staffing. We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase due to costs attributable to payroll, staffing costs and corporate governance.

At July 27, 2005, we had 68 permanent employees and seven temporary employees as compared to August 1, 2004 when we had 60 permanent employees and seven temporary employees.  The temporary employees have been working on a record retention project that is expected to conclude in the next five to eight months.

Property Expenses

Property expenses are broken down into costs associated with non-net leased multi-tenant properties, unleased single-tenant properties and general portfolio expenses. Expenses related to the multi-tenant and unleased single-tenant properties include, but are not limited to, property taxes, maintenance, insurance, utilities, property inspections, bad debt expense and legal fees. General portfolio costs include, but are not limited to, insurance, legal, bad debt expense, property inspections and title search fees. At June 30, 2005, 29 properties were available for lease, as compared to 32 at December 31, 2004 and 24 at June 30, 2004.

27

Property expenses were $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2005 and $749,000 in the second quarter of 2004.  A provision for impairment of $47,000 is included in the property expenses for the second quarter and first six months of 2005. Property expenses were $1.9 million in the first six months of 2005 and $1.5 million in the first six months of 2004.  The increase in property expenses in the second quarter and first six months of 2005 is primarily attributable to an increase in bad debt expense and maintenance costs.

Income Taxes

Income taxes were $203,000 in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to $191,000 in the second quarter of 2004.  Income taxes for the first six months of 2005 and 2004 were $401,000 and $344,000, respectively. These amounts are for city and state income taxes paid by Realty Income.  The increase in 2005 is due to an increase in rental revenue causing higher city and state income tax expense.

In addition, Crest Net incurred state and federal income taxes of $91,000 in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2004. Crest Net incurred state and federal income taxes of $455,000 in the first six months of 2005 as compared to $2.8 million in the first six months of 2004. The decrease in 2005 as compared to 2004 is due to lower taxable income, primarily attributable to lower gains on sales of real estate acquired for resale. These amounts are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

Discontinued Operations

Crest Net acquires properties with the intention of reselling them rather than holding them as investments and operating the properties.  Consequently, we classify properties acquired by Crest Net as held for sale at the date of acquisition and do not depreciate them.  The operation of Crest Net’s properties is classified as “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

The following is a summary of Crest Net’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

Crest Net’s income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale	$ 422		$ 3,883		$ 1,649		$ 7,992
Rental revenue	287		614		569		1,614
Interest expense	(163	)	(164	)	(310	)	(399	)
General and administrative expense	(134	)	(122	)	(273	)	(247	)
Property expenses	(25	)	(7	)	(51	)	(15	)
Income taxes	(91	)	(1,325	)	(455	)	(2,791	)
Income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest	$ 296		$ 2,879		$ 1,129		$ 6,154
Per common share, basic and diluted	$ 0.00		$ 0.04		$ 0.01		$ 0.08

28

Realty Income’s operations from five properties listed as held for sale at June 30, 2005, plus properties sold in 2004 and 2005 have been classified as discontinued operations.  The following is a summary of our discontinued operations from real estate held for investment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

Realty Income’s income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Gain on sales of investment properties	$ 2,641		$ 2,499		$ 3,463		$ 3,949
Rental revenue	256		880		555		1,911
Other revenue	—		35		1		141
Depreciation and amortization	(6	)	(226	)	(64	)	(491	)
Property expenses	(26	)	(128	)	(113	)	(249	)
Provisions for impairments	(4	)	(271	)	(21	)	(271	)
Income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment	$ 2,861		$ 2,789		$ 3,821		$ 4,990
Per common share, basic and diluted	$ 0.04		$ 0.04		$ 0.05		$ 0.06

The following is a summary of our total discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended 6/30/05	Three months ended 6/30/04	Six months ended 6/30/05	Six months ended 6/30/04
Income from discontinued operations:
Real estate acquired for resale by Crest	$ 296	$ 2,879	$ 1,129	$ 6,154
Real estate held for investment	2,861	2,789	3,821	4,990
Income from discontinued operations	$ 3,157	$ 5,668	$ 4,950	$ 11,144
Per common share, basic and diluted	$ 0.04	$ 0.07	$ 0.06	$ 0.14

Gain on Sales of Real Estate Acquired for Resale by Crest Net

During the second quarter of 2005, Crest Net sold one property for $3.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $422,000.  In comparison, during the second quarter of 2004, Crest Net sold 16 properties for $26.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.9 million.  Crest Net’s gains on sales are reported before income taxes and are included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2005, Crest Net sold six properties for $11.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.6 million.  In comparison, during the first six months 2004, Crest Net sold 35 properties for $57.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $8.0 million.

At June 30, 2005, Crest Net had $22.2 million invested in 13 properties, which are held for sale. Our goal is for Crest Net to carry an average inventory of $20 to $25 million in real estate.  Crest Net generates an earnings spread on the difference between the lease payments it receives on the properties held in inventory and the cost of capital used to acquire properties.  It is our belief that at this level of inventory, rental revenue will exceed the ongoing operating expenses of Crest Net without any property sales.

29

Gain on Sales of Investment Properties by Realty Income

During the second quarter of 2005, we sold seven investment properties and a portion of land from one property for $8.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.7 million.  This gain is included in discontinued operations, except for $14,000 that is included in other revenue. In comparison, during the second quarter of 2004, we sold or exchanged nine investment properties for $5.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.5 million. This gain is included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2005, we sold 11 investment properties and a portion of land from one property for $14.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.5 million.  This gain is included in discontinued operations, except for $14,000 that is included in other revenue. In comparison, during the first six months of 2004, we sold or exchanged 18 investment properties for $11.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.9 million. This gain is included in discontinued operations.

We have an active portfolio management program that incorporates the sale of assets when we believe the reinvestment of the sale proceeds will generate higher returns, enhance the credit quality of our real estate portfolio or extend our average remaining lease term. At June 30, 2005, we classified real estate with a carrying amount of $23.8 million as held for sale on our balance sheet, which includes properties owned by Crest Net.  Of the $22.2 million invested in properties held by Crest Net, on our balance sheet $20.8 million is included in real estate held for sale, net and $1.4 million is included in other assets.  The $1.4 million reflects investments classified as intangible assets in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141, Business Combinations.  Additionally, we anticipate selling investment properties from our portfolio that have not yet been specifically identified, from which we anticipate receiving between $15 million and $35 million in proceeds during the next 12 months. We intend to invest these proceeds into new property acquisitions. However, we cannot guarantee that we will sell properties during the next 12 months.

Provisions for Impairments

Provisions for impairments of $51,000 were recorded on two properties in the second quarter 2005 and $271,000 was taken on one property in the second quarter of 2004.  These provisions are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment”, except for $47,000 in the second quarter of 2005, which is included in property expenses.

Provisions for impairments of $68,000 were recorded on two properties in the first six months of 2005 and $271,000 was taken on one property in the first six months of 2004.  These provisions are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment”, except for $47,000 in the first six months of 2005, which is included in property expenses.

Preferred Stock Dividends and Redemption Charge

We had preferred stock cash dividends of $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2004.  We had preferred stock cash dividends of $4.7 million in the first six months of 2005 as compared to $5.4 million in the first six months of 2004.  The decrease in 2005 is due to a lower dividend rate on our Class D preferred stock than on our Class B and Class C preferred stock, which was partially offset by more preferred shares being outstanding in the second quarter of 2005 than in the second quarter of 2004.

When we redeemed our Class B preferred stock in June 2004 we incurred a non-cash charge of $2.4 million for the excess of redemption value over the carrying value.  This non-cash charge represents the Class B preferred stock original issuance costs that were paid in 1999 and recorded as a reduction to net income available to common stockholders when the shares were redeemed.  This non-cash charge equates to $0.03 per common share in 2004.

30

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders

Net income available to common stockholders was $22.3 million in the second quarter of 2005 versus $21.4 million in the second quarter of 2004, an increase of $900,000.  Net income available to common stockholders was $43.5 million in the first six months of 2005 versus $43.9 million in the first six months of 2004, a decrease of $400,000.

The calculation to determine net income available to common stockholders includes gains from the sale of properties. The amount of gains varies from period to period based on the timing of property sales and can significantly impact net income available to common stockholders.

During the second quarter of 2005, the gain recognized from the sales of investment properties was $2.7 million as compared to $2.5 million for the second quarter of 2004 and the gain recognized from the sales of properties acquired for resale was $422,000 as compared to $3.9 million for the second quarter of 2004.

For the first six months of 2005, the gain recognized from the sales of investment properties was $3.5 million as compared to $3.9 million for the first six months of 2004 and the gain recognized from the sales of properties acquired for resale was $1.6 million as compared to $8.0 million for the first six months of 2004.

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (FFO)

AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

FFO for the second quarter of 2005 increased by $1.7 million, or 5.8%, to $30.9 million as compared to $29.2 million in the second quarter of 2004. FFO for the first six months of 2005 increased by $2.1 million, or 3.5%, to $62.0 million as compared to $59.9 million in the first six months of 2004. The following is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to FFO.  Also presented is information regarding distributions paid to common stockholders and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the second quarter and first six months of 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months ended 6/30/04
Net income available to common stockholders	$ 22,315		$ 21,446		$ 43,467		$ 43,868
Depreciation and amortization:
Continuing operations	11,243		10,008		22,049		19,558
Discontinued operations	6		226		64		491
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment	(35	)	(29	)	(67	)	(58	)
Gain on sales of investment properties:
Continuing operations	(14	)	—		(14	)	—
Discontinued operations	(2,641	)	(2,500	)	(3,463	)	(3,949	)
Total funds from operations	$ 30,874		$ 29,151		$ 62,036		$ 59,910
FFO per common share, basic and diluted	$ 0.39		$ 0.37		$ 0.78		$ 0.77
Distributions paid to common stockholders	$ 26,414		$ 23,922		$ 52,676		$ 46,725
FFO in excess of distributions to common stockholders	$ 4,460		$ 5,229		$ 9,360		$ 13,185
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	79,676,168		79,323,180		79,667,812		77,822,186

31

We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust’s definition, as net income available to common stockholders, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, reduced by gains on sales of investment property and extraordinary items.

We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a REIT’s operating performance as it is based on a net income analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes non-cash items such as depreciation. The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT, using historical accounting for depreciation, could be less informative. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. In addition, FFO is used as a measure of our compliance with the financial covenants of our credit facility.

Presentation of this information is intended to assist the reader in comparing the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of Realty Income’s performance. In addition, FFO should not be considered as an alternative to reviewing our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities as a measure of liquidity, of our ability to make cash distributions or of our ability to pay interest payments.

Other Non-Cash Items and Capitalized Expenditures

The following information includes non-cash items and capitalized expenditures on existing properties in our portfolio. These items are not included in the adjustments to net income available to common stockholders to arrive at FFO. Analysts and investors often request this supplemental information.

(dollars in thousands)	Three months ended 6/30/05		Three months ended 6/30/04		Six months ended 6/30/05		Six months Ended 6/30/04
Provisions for impairments	$ 51		$ 271		$ 68		$ 271
Amortization of settlements on treasury lock agreements(1)	189		189		378		378
Amortization of deferred note financing costs(2)	253		228		487		456
Amortization of deferred stock compensation and
stock option costs	551		367		1,091		709
Capitalized leasing costs and commissions	(56	)	(75	)	(400	)	(229	)
Capitalized building improvements	(582	)	(378	)	(864	)	(587	)
Straight line rent(3)	(188	)	(17	)	(935	)	52
Preferred stock origination costs write-off (4)	—		2,360		—		2,360

(1)   The settlements on the treasury lock agreements resulted from an interest rate risk prevention strategy that was used by the Company in 1997 and 1998, which correlated to pending issuances of senior note securities.  We have not employed this strategy since 1998.

(2)   Amortization of deferred note financing costs includes the amortization of costs incurred and capitalized when our notes were issued in May 1997, October 1998, January 1999, March 2003, November 2003 and March 2005. These costs are being amortized over the lives of these notes. No costs associated with our credit facility agreements or annual fees paid to credit rating agencies have been included.

(3)   A negative amount indicates that our straight-line rent was greater than our actual cash rent collected.  A positive amount indicates that our straight-line rent was less than our actual cash rent collected.

(4)   Represents the Class B preferred stock non-cash charge for the excess of redemption value over the carrying value.

32

PROPERTY PORTFOLIO INFORMATION

At June 30, 2005, we owned a diversified portfolio:

•Of 1,582 retail properties;

•With an occupancy rate of 98.2%, or 1,553 properties occupied of the 1,582 properties in the portfolio;

•Leased to 98 different retail chains doing business in 30 separate retail industries;

•Located in 48 states;

•With over 12.4 million square feet of leasable space; and

•With an average leasable retail space of 7,900 square feet.

In addition to our real estate portfolio at June 30, 2005, our subsidiary, Crest Net had invested $22.2 million in a portfolio of 13 retail properties located in seven states. These properties are classified as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet.

At June 30, 2005, 1,549, or 97.9%, of our 1,582 retail properties were owned under net-lease agreements. Net leases typically require the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, tenants are typically responsible for future rent increases (generally subject to ceilings) based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed increases or, to a lesser degree, additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level.

Our net-leased retail properties primarily are leased to regional and national retail chain store operators. Most buildings are single-story structures with adequate parking on site to accommodate peak retail traffic periods. The properties tend to be on major thoroughfares with relatively high traffic counts, adequate access and proximity to a sufficient population base to constitute a suitable market or trade area for the retailer’s business.

Environmental Liabilities

Effective in June 2005, we entered into a new seven-year environmental insurance policy on our property portfolio replacing the previous five-year environmental insurance policy.  The limits on our new policy are $10 million per occurrence, and $50 million in the aggregate, subject to a $40,000 self insurance retention, per occurrence, for properties with underground storage tanks and a $100,000 self insurance retention, per occurrence, for all other properties.  It is possible that our insurance could be insufficient to address any particular environmental situation and that, in the future, we could be unable to obtain insurance for environmental matters at a reasonable cost, or at all.

33

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our properties classified according to the business of the respective tenants, expressed as a percentage of our total rental revenue:

	Percentage of Rental Revenue (1)
	For the
	Quarter		For the Years Ended December 31,
	Ended
	June 30,
30 Industries	2005		2004		2003		2002		2001		2000		1999
Apparel stores	1.6	%	1.8	%	2.1	%	2.3	%	2.4	%	2.4	%	3.8	%
Automotive collision services	1.3		1.0		0.3		—		—		—		—
Automotive parts	3.4		3.8		4.5		4.9		5.7		6.0		6.3
Automotive service	7.8		7.7		8.3		7.0		5.7		5.8		6.6
Automotive tire services	7.3		7.8		3.1		2.7		2.6		2.3		2.3
Book stores	0.3		0.3		0.4		0.4		0.4		0.5		0.5
Business services	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Child care	13.2		14.4		17.8		20.8		23.9		24.7		25.3
Consumer electronics	1.4		2.1		3.0		3.3		4.0		4.9		4.4
Convenience stores	18.8		19.2		13.3		9.1		8.4		8.4		7.2
Crafts and novelties	0.4		0.5		0.6		0.4		0.4		0.4		0.4
Drug stores	3.3		0.1		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2
Entertainment	2.2		2.3		2.6		2.3		1.8		2.0		1.2
Equipment rental services	0.3		0.3		0.2		—		—		—		—
Financial services	0.1		0.1		—		—		—		—		—
General merchandise	0.4		0.4		0.5		0.5		0.6		0.6		0.6
Grocery stores	0.7		0.8		0.4		0.5		0.6		0.6		0.5
Health and fitness	3.8		4.0		3.8		3.8		3.6		2.4		0.6
Home furnishings	4.0		4.1		4.9		5.4		6.0		5.8		6.5
Home improvement	1.1		1.0		1.1		1.2		1.3		2.0		3.6
Motor vehicle dealerships	2.6		0.6		—		—		—		—		—
Office supplies	1.5		1.6		1.9		2.1		2.2		2.3		2.6
Pet supplies and services	1.4		1.4		1.7		1.7		1.6		1.5		1.1
Private education	0.8		1.1		1.2		1.3		1.5		1.4		1.2
Restaurants	9.1		9.7		11.8		13.5		12.2		12.3		13.3
Shoe stores	0.1		0.3		0.9		0.8		0.7		0.8		1.1
Sporting goods	3.6		3.4		3.8		4.1		0.9		—		—
Theaters	3.2		3.5		4.1		3.9		4.3		2.7		0.6
Travel plazas	0.4		0.4		0.3		—		—		—		—
Video rental	2.6		2.8		3.3		3.3		3.7		3.9		4.3
Other	3.2		3.4		3.8		4.4		5.2		6.0		5.7
Totals	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

(1)Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at the end of each period presented (including revenue from properties reclassified to discontinued operations) and excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.

34

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2005, classified according to the retail business types and the level of services they provide (dollars in thousands):

		Rental Revenue
		for the Quarter	Percentage of
	Number of	Ended	Rental
Industry	Properties (1)	June 30, 2005 (2)	Revenue
Tenants Providing Services
Automotive collision services	11	$ 610	1.3	%
Automotive service	219	3,718	7.8
Child care	273	6,260	13.2
Entertainment	9	1,020	2.2
Equipment rental services	2	150	0.3
Financial services	3	53	0.1
Health and fitness	13	1,798	3.8
Private education	5	376	0.8
Theaters	12	1,529	3.2
Other	10	1,508	3.2
	557	17,022	35.9
Tenants Selling Goods and Services
Automotive parts (with installation)	30	583	1.2
Automotive tire services	102	3,472	7.3
Business services	1	32	0.1
Convenience stores	386	8,930	18.8
Home improvement	2	52	0.1
Motor vehicle dealerships	13	1,220	2.6
Pet supplies and services	9	607	1.3
Restaurants	211	4,296	9.1
Travel plazas	1	167	0.4
Video rental	34	1,235	2.6
	789	20,594	43.5
Tenants Selling Goods
Apparel stores	5	775	1.6
Automotive parts	74	1,041	2.2
Book stores	2	154	0.3
Consumer electronics	24	644	1.4
Crafts and novelties	4	212	0.4
Drug stores	29	1,540	3.3
General merchandise	11	172	0.4
Grocery stores	6	347	0.7
Home furnishings	38	1,917	4.0
Home improvement	16	489	1.0
Office supplies	9	716	1.5
Pet supplies	2	37	0.1
Shoe stores	3	51	0.1
Sporting goods	13	1,687	3.6
	236	9,782	20.6
Totals	1,582	$ 47,398	100.0	%

(1)Excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.

(2)Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2005 (including revenue from properties reclassified to discontinued operations of $60).

35

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the timing of the initial lease term expirations (excluding extension options) on our 1,549 net leased, single-tenant retail properties as of June 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands):

	Total Portfolio				Initial Expirations (3)				Subsequent Expirations (4)
Year	Total Number of Leases Expiring (1)	Rental Revenue for the Quarter Ended 6/30/05 (2)	% of Rental Revenue		Number of Leases Expiring	Rental Revenue for the Quarter Ended 6/30/05	% of Total Rental Revenue		Number of Leases Expiring	Rental Revenue for the Quarter Ended 6/30/05	% of Total Rental Revenue
2005	65	$ 1,277	2.8	%	49	$ 1,023	2.2	%	16	$ 254	0.6	%
2006	84	1,828	4.0		31	714	1.6		53	1,114	2.4
2007	123	2,175	4.8		87	1,539	3.4		36	636	1.4
2008	99	2,093	4.6		60	1,418	3.1		39	675	1.5
2009	90	1,929	4.2		30	684	1.5		60	1,245	2.7
2010	53	1,198	2.6		37	909	2.0		16	289	0.6
2011	41	1,438	3.1		33	1,239	2.7		8	199	0.4
2012	44	1,375	3.0		42	1,324	2.9		2	51	0.1
2013	74	3,357	7.3		66	3,145	6.8		8	212	0.5
2014	48	2,018	4.4		36	1,781	3.9		12	237	0.5
2015	46	1,248	2.7		29	820	1.8		17	428	0.9
2016	17	505	1.1		15	423	0.9		2	82	0.2
2017	22	1,482	3.2		18	1,415	3.1		4	67	0.1
2018	23	1,028	2.2		23	1,028	2.2		—	—	—
2019	95	4,487	9.8		94	4,294	9.4		1	193	0.4
2020	67	2,128	4.6		66	2,117	4.6		1	11	*
2021	125	4,082	8.9		125	4,082	8.9		—	—	—
2022	96	2,596	5.7		95	2,582	5.7		1	14	*
2023	234	6,423	14.0		233	6,398	13.9		1	25	0.1
2024	58	1,704	3.7		58	1,704	3.7		—	—	—
2025	33	475	1.0		33	475	1.0		—	—	—
2026	2	93	0.2		2	93	0.2		—	—	—
2028	2	54	0.1		2	54	0.1		—	—	—
2033	3	357	0.8		3	357	0.8		—	—	—
2034	2	230	0.5		2	230	0.5		—	—	—
2037	2	325	0.7		2	325	0.7		—	—	—
2043	1	13	*		—	—	—		1	13	*
Totals	1,549	$ 45,918	100.0	%	1,271	$ 40,173	87.6	%	278	$ 5,745	12.4	%

*Less than 0.1%

(1)Excludes four multi-tenant properties, 29 vacant and unleased properties, one of which is a multi-tenant property, and properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.  The lease expirations for properties under construction are based on the estimated date of completion of those properties.

(2)Includes rental revenue of $60 from properties reclassified to discontinued operations and excludes revenue of $1,480 from four multi-tenant properties and from 29 vacant and unleased properties at June 30, 2005.

(3)Represents leases that are expiring for the first time to the initial tenant of the property.

(4)Represents lease expirations on properties in the portfolio, which have previously been renewed, extended or re-tenanted.

36

The following table sets forth certain state-by-state information regarding Realty Income’s property portfolio as of June 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands):

					Rental Revenue
				Approximate	For the Quarter	Percentage of
	Number of	Percent		Leasable	Ended June 30,	Rental
State	Properties (1)	Leased		Square Feet (1)	2005 (2)	Revenue
Alabama	18	94	%	156,600	$ 427	0.9	%
Alaska	2	100		128,500	251	0.5
Arizona	71	99		338,100	1,890	4.0
Arkansas	8	88		48,800	139	0.3
California	61	100		1,057,100	3,967	8.4
Colorado	48	98		399,100	1,686	3.6
Connecticut	16	100		245,600	927	2.0
Delaware	16	100		29,100	338	0.7
Florida	126	98		1,253,400	4,847	10.2
Georgia	99	99		645,100	2,455	5.2
Idaho	14	100		91,900	369	0.8
Illinois	45	100		395,700	1,486	3.1
Indiana	26	92		147,700	498	1.1
Iowa	9	89		57,000	144	0.3
Kansas	20	90		188,300	510	1.1
Kentucky	12	100		41,200	262	0.6
Louisiana	14	100		65,200	294	0.6
Maryland	24	100		207,600	1,139	2.4
Massachusetts	37	100		203,100	997	2.1
Michigan	13	100		81,600	299	0.6
Minnesota	18	100		211,600	538	1.1
Mississippi	33	88		194,400	309	0.6
Missouri	32	97		222,900	707	1.5
Montana	2	100		30,000	74	0.2
Nebraska	13	100		104,500	473	1.0
Nevada	15	100		191,000	823	1.7
New Hampshire	10	100		89,600	369	0.8
New Jersey	26	100		200,100	1,062	2.2
New Mexico	7	100		53,300	109	0.2
New York	27	100		339,600	1,664	3.5
North Carolina	50	98		325,000	1,397	2.9
North Dakota	1	100		22,000	16	*
Ohio	105	100		661,500	2,476	5.2
Oklahoma	17	100		94,300	358	0.8
Oregon	17	100		253,300	534	1.1
Pennsylvania	81	100		481,300	2,271	4.8
Rhode Island	1	100		3,500	29	0.1
South Carolina	55	100		215,600	1,414	3.0
South Dakota	1	100		6,500	24	*
Tennessee	97	99		459,500	2,183	4.6
Texas	175	97		1,653,000	4,291	9.1
Utah	6	100		35,100	142	0.3
Vermont	1	100		2,500	22	*
Virginia	55	100		410,800	2,073	4.4
Washington	37	100		243,900	694	1.5
West Virginia	2	0		16,800	8	*
Wisconsin	16	88		153,700	360	0.8
Wyoming	3	100		14,900	53	0.1
Totals/Average	1,582	98	%	12,470,900	$ 47,398	100.0	%

* Less than 0.1%

(1)  Excludes properties owned by our subsidiary, Crest Net.

(2)  Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2005 (including revenue from properties reclassified to discontinued operations of $60).

37

IMPACT OF INFLATION

Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of increases in the tenants’ sales volumes, increases in the consumer price index, and/or fixed increases. We expect that inflation will cause these lease provisions to result in rent increases over time. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, as provided for in the leases, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

Approximately 97.9%, or 1,549, of the 1,582 properties in the portfolio are leased to tenants under net leases where the tenant is responsible for property costs and expenses. Net leases tend to reduce our exposure to rising property expenses due to inflation. Inflation and increased costs may have an adverse impact on our tenants if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in revenue.

IMPACT OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments. Statement No. 123R requires companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. We are required to adopt Statement No. 123R effective January 1, 2006. The impact of adopting Statement No. 123R is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

OTHER INFORMATION

At July 27, 2005, we had 68 permanent employees and seven temporary employees.

Realty Income’s common stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “O”, our central index key, or CIK, number is 726728 and cusip number is 756109-104.

Realty Income’s 7.375% Class D cumulative redeemable preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “OprD” and its cusip number is 756109-609.

Realty Income’s 8.25% Monthly Income Senior Notes, due 2008, are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “OUI”.  The cusip number of these notes is 756109-203.

We maintain an Internet website at www.realtyincome.com. On our website we make available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these reports with the SEC.  None of the information on our website is deemed to be a part of this report.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our credit facility and long-term notes used to maintain liquidity and expand our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives we issue long-term notes, primarily at fixed rates, and may selectively enter into derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate lock agreements, interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial

38

instrument. We were not a party to any derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2005. We do not enter into any transactions for speculative or trading purposes.

Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The following table presents the principal amounts, weighted average interest rates, fair values and other terms required by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes at June 30, 2005 (dollars in millions):

Expected Maturity Data

		2005			2007		2008		2009	Thereafter		Total			Fair Value(6)
Fixed rate debt	—			$110.0(2)		$100.0(3)		$20.0(4)		$350.0(5)	$580.		0	$595.0
Average interest rate				7.8%		8.3%		8.0%		5.6%	6.5		%
Variable rate debt	$54.8		(1)	—		—		—		—	$54.		8	$54.8
Average interest rate	4.2		%								4.2		%

(1)   The credit facility expires in October 2005.  The credit facility balance as of July 27, 2005 was $61.2 million.

(2)   $110 million matures in May 2007.

(3)   $100 million matures in November 2008.

(4)   $20 million matures in January 2009.

(5)   $100 million matures in March 2013, $150 million matures in November 2015 and $100 million matures in March 2035.

(6)We base the fair value of the fixed rate debt on the closing market price or indicative price per each note as of the end of the quarter. The fair value of the variable rate debt approximates its carrying value because its terms are similar to those available in the market place.

The table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of June 30, 2005; it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss, with respect to interest rate fluctuations, would depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at the time, and interest rates.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedure

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and were operating at a reasonable assurance level.

39

Changes in Internal Controls

There have not been any significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. There were no material weaknesses, and therefore no corrective actions were taken.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

PART II.                OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4.                    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Our annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 10, 2005. As of March 4, 2005, the record date for the annual meeting, there were 79,582,705 common shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Three proposals were considered at the annual meeting.

•Proposal 1. An amendment to our charter to increase the total number of shares of common stock that we have the authority to issue from 100 million to 200 million shares.

•Proposal 2. An amendment to our charter to declassify our Board of Directors.

•Proposal 3. If proposal 2 is approved, the election of seven directors, to serve until the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.

	Number of		Number of		Number of
	Shares voted for		shares against		shares abstained
Proposal 1.		63,598,076		5,195,706		778,039
Proposal 2.		67,273,409		1,225,161		1,073,251

Proposal 3. Proposal 2 was approved and the following directors were elected.

	Shares Voted For
Kathleen R. Allen	69,034,817
Donald R. Cameron	69,033,200
William E. Clark	69,009,927
Roger P. Kuppinger	68,831,873
Thomas A. Lewis	69,043,052
Michael D. McKee	69,043,171
Willard H. Smith Jr.	69,012,382

40

Item 6.                    Exhibits And Reports On Form 8-K

A.  Exhibits:

Exhibit No.	Description
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
* 3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended by amendment No. 1 dated May 10, 2005 and No. 2. dated May 10, 2005.
* 3.2	Bylaws of the Company, as amended by amendment No. 1 dated March 20, 2000 and No. 2 dated June 15, 2005.
3.3	Articles Supplementary of the Class A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Realty Income Corporation (filed as exhibit A of exhibit 1 to Realty Income’s registration statement on Form 8-A, dated June 26, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4	Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of Realty Income Corporation classifying and designating the Class D Preferred Stock (filed as exhibit 3.8 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed on May 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5	Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of Realty Income Corporation classifying and designating the Class D Preferred Stock (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures

4.1	Pricing Committee Resolutions and Form of 7.75% Notes due 2007 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 5, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2	Indenture dated as of May 6, 1997 between the Company and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 5, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3	First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 28, 1997, between the Company and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-B and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4	Rights Agreement, dated as of June 25, 1998, between Realty Income Corporation and The Bank of New York (filed as an exhibit 1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form 8-A, dated June 26, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5	Pricing Committee Resolutions (filed as an exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6	Form of 8.25% Notes due 2008 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7	Indenture dated as of October 28, 1998 between Realty Income and The Bank of New York (filed as exhibit 4.1 to Realty Income’s Form 8-K, dated October 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).

41

4.8	Pricing Committee Resolutions and Form of 8% Notes due 2009 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Realty Income’s Form 8-K, dated January 21, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.9	Form of 5-3/8% Senior Notes due 2013 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Realty Income’s Form 8-K, dated March 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.10	Officer’s Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5-3/8% Senior Notes due 2013 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to Realty Income’s Form 8-K, dated March 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.11	Form of 5-1/2% Senior Notes due 2015 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated November 19, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.12	Officer’s Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5-1/2% Senior Notes due 2015 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated November 19, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13	Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement between Realty Income Corporation and The Bank of New York, dated February 25, 2005 (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated February 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.14	Form of 5-7/8% Senior Notes due 2035 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated March 8, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.15	Officer’s Certificate pursuant to section 301 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5-7/8% Senior Debentures due 2035 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated March 8, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

Material Contracts

10.1 $300 million Credit Agreement dated June 17, 2005 (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

Certifications

* 31.1	Section 302 Certifications as filed by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551.
* 31.2	Section 302 Certifications as filed by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551.
* 32	Section 906 Certifications as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

* Filed herewith

42

B.Four reports on Form 8-K were filed by the registrant during the quarter for which this report is filed.

A Form 8-K dated April 27, 2005, was filed on April 27, 2005, furnishing our earnings press release for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

A Form 8-K dated May 10, 2005, was filed on May 11, 2005, reporting two Articles of Amendment, one to declassify the Board of Directors and a second to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to $200,000,000.

A Form 8-K dated June 15, 2005, was filed on June 16, 2005, reporting that Ronald L. Merriman has been appointed to our Board of Directors effective July 13, 2005.  The Form 8-K also reported an amendment to our Bylaws establishing the term of office for the Directors on our board of Directors to be until the next annual meeting of the stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualifies or until his or her death, retirement, resignation or removal.

A Form 8-K dated June 17, 2005, was filed on June 20, 2005, reporting that on we entered into a $300 million credit agreement. The terms of the credit agreement will begin on October 28, 2005, upon the termination of our existing $250 million revolving credit facility.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REALTY INCOME CORPORATION
	/s/ GREGORY J. FAHEY
Date: August 2, 2005	Gregory J. Fahey
	Vice President, Controller
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

43