Date: 02/02/2000 6:07 PM Subject: File Number SR-NYSE-99-47 Gentlemen: I wish to comment on the NYSE and NASD proposal to raise the minimum equity requirements for DayTraders to trade on margin. I am presently daytrading for a living for almost 1 1/2 years now. I am not a "big time" day trader and started with the minimum requirements of a broker of $7,500.00. With this, I was able to pay for my monthly obligations, enjoy the freedom of working at home and the control of when to buy/sell. I am enjoying it tremendously. I am sure there are a lot of daytraders who lose money as there are a lot of people who lose money in other investments. But the requirement of $25,000.00 and raising the margin to 4:1 for daytrader is so unfair to traders like me. If the rational is to protect the small investor, then the 4:1 margin exposes the same investor you are trying to protect, for more losses. I believe the best protection is education, education and more education. I have watched Nasd Level II for almost 2 years now, and I can testify how the market makers manipulate the price of a stock. The market makers place fake bids and asks in big sizes to scare daytraders! They are part of the problems. I hope that your office would address this issue, instead. How often can one see a market maker making 10K, 20K bids/asks and then pulls them out. And it becomes obvious that such market maker has a agenda on a particular stock. The $25,000 and 4:1 proposal would then increase the daytraders exposure. The market markets would gladly chew the daytraders money. I believe education and reducing the ability of market makers to manipulate the market would go along way in protecting the small investors. Every daytrader should be required to have Nasd Level II and fast execution system. Every broker who caters to the needs of daytraders should give the daytraders simulated software on Nasd Level II and the fast execution system before such daytrader can start daytrading. I hope the above can, in a small way, help your office in deciding the applicability of the above mentioned proposal. Very truly yours, Amabel Sarmiento