Council of Institutional InvestorsJanuary 10, 2003 Jonathan G. Katz
Re: File No. S7-49-02 Dear Mr. Katz: The Council of Institutional Investors, an association of more than 130 public, corporate and union pension funds with over $3 trillion in investments, supports the Securities and Exchange Commission's proposal to further restrict the services auditors may provide to audit clients, require audit committee approval of auditor services and further enhance the audit-fee disclosures provided to investors. The SEC's proposal is largely consistent with the Council's policy (attached) on auditor independence. Since the Council doesn't have a policy on audit partner rotation or compensation issues, we are not commenting on these aspects of the proposal. A few changes would improve the proposed rule and result in stronger protections for investors. First, the Council does not endorse exempting foreign auditors from the rules. Since foreign auditors now audit about one out of every ten public companies, such an exemption creates a loophole that will only increase in size and potentially harm investors. Second, Council policies call on audit committees to establish and disclose an auditor independence policy and to pre-approve all non-audit services exceeding a de minimis amount of $50,000. We do not agree that pre-approval should no longer be necessary if audit committees adopt a policy on non-audit services. Such an exemption, which we believe is inconsistent with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, may weaken audit committee oversight and may harm investors. Third, the Council suggests that attest service fees be listed separately and not included in the audit fees. We believe such disclosure ensures that shareholders are aware of fees paid for the actual audit and of all other fees paid to the auditors. Audited financial statements are one of the primary sources of information available to guide and monitor Council members' investment decisions. The integrity of these statements and the accountants responsible for preparing them is critical to Council members and their millions of pension system participants and beneficiaries. Investors depend on truly independent, disinterested outside auditors to stand as a critical defense against fraudulent or otherwise flawed financial statements. Just as Council members believe that an independent director's only nontrivial connection to the company should be that person's directorship, they believe that an independent auditor's only nontrivial connection to a company should be its audit services. To ensure that the professional independence of outside auditors-or at the very least, the appearance of their independence-is not threatened by conflicts of interest arising from non-audit relationships, Council members believe that auditors should be prohibited from providing nearly all non-audit services to their audit clients. Members also believe that information about fees paid to auditors, categorized by types of services, should be disclosed to shareholders. In general, the Council believes the proposed restrictions will benefit investors by ensuring that truly independent, outside auditors provide objective evaluations of corporate financial statements. Please contact me with any questions.
cc: SEC Chairman Harvey L. Pitt
Council of Institutional Investors
|