U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
SEC Seal
Home | Previous Page
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Author:  "Shirley Reith Bennett"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  12:51 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Reg. FD File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I am in favor of Proposed Regulation FD: File No.S7-31-99
     
Shirley Reith Bennett
     

Author:  "dlbrook"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  3:18 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99" 
------------------------------- Message Contents 
Please make it a level playing field for every one. We do not need Wall Street 
Analysts to interpret what companies say.
Sincerely,
Dennis Brook
     

Author:  "H & C Browne"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  6:16 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99. Please stop giving the 
insiders such a big advantage over me. I have been unhappy for years about 
the government and companies giving information to investment companies and 
brokers secretly.
Horace Browne    2401 St. Vincent's way Melbourne Fl. 32935
     

Author:  jim & maria cannon  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  3:38 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed       Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99" 
------------------------------- Message Contents 
"Proposed
      Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
     
As an individual investor I support this proposed rule.  All investors 
are entitled to free access to all relevant information at the same 
time.
     
James J. Cannon
     

Author:  "J.P.Carr"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  12:21 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
please level the playing field!
John Carr MD

Author:  "Tim Herdklotz"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  5:19 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I am apposed to selective disclosure.
     
Tim Herdklotz
     

Author:   at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  10:01 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Reg. FD:  file # S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I am very much FOR this regulation as it will level the playing field in the 
investment world.
     
Thanks.
     
William K. Jackson

Author:  "markc"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  11:54 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: RE:#S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
     
     
     

Author:  Joe Marx  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  4:44 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I am opposed to insider favoritism. I strongly favor Proposed Regulation 
FD: File No. S7-31-99.
     
Thank You.

Author:  "Charles Munn"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  4:49 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
     
Charles Munn, 7312 N. Skyview Ln, #J304, Tacoma WA 98406. 
email:charlesmunn1@home.com
     

Author:  "Dennis Murphy"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  9:44 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents 
Dear Sirs,
I urge you to approve this important regulation regarding the timely 
dissemination of company information.
Thank You,
Dennis M. Murphy
     

Author:  Dave Nicholls  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  4:12 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99" 
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I support full disclosure to all.
     
David Nicholls
     
     

Author:   at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  1:54 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I am in favor of disclosing company financial information 
to all at the same time. Not selectively to the investment 
community. It should be a level playing field.
     
Regards, Bob Prichard
Investor

Author:   at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  8:17 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed regulation FD File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
There is no place for two kinds of informatin. One for big business, one for 
me. My investments are important to me and so is a "level playing field". It 
is galling to have the big guys get the information and then act "after 
hours" and in effect steal from me.  Fair is far.  Bernard E Reilly 632 3RD 
Ave S.E. Mpls Mn 55414

Author:  Ken Schultz  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  5:07 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD:File No. S7-31-99               File 
------------------------------- Message Contents 
As a private investor, I urge you to adopt the requlation.
     
It is no favor to the public to filter facts through firms that 
could then
    charge us, or
    put their own "spin" on
material developments influencing stock prices!
     
It is important to "level the playing field"!
     
Thank you.
     
Kenneth E. Schultz
     

Author:  "Douglas Scott"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  10:39 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99" 
------------------------------- Message Contents 
 I support the proposed regulation
     
Douglas Scott

Author:  Daniel Sikkink  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  2:39 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No.  S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No.  S7-31-99.   Daniel Sikkink Ph# 
(760) 368-4676
     

Author:  "Robert Soutter"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  9:35 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
     

Author:  "Howard Steinberg"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  4:36 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD !!!
     
DON'T GIVE THE INDIVIDUAL A BAD RAP !!!
     
BE FAIR !!!
     
Howard Steinberg
3292 19th place sw
Largo, FL 33774
     
     

Author:  Peter Stern  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  10:54 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I understand that you guys are looking at introducing a rule to prevent 
companies providing special info to fund managers and analysts without making 
that same info available to small investors like myself.  I believe this will 
be an excellent thing to have and it would set an example for other countries 
to follow.  I wish the Ontario Securities Commission here in Canada had the 
balls to bring in and enforce the same thing.
     
I'm sure that analysts won't like this.  However, I consider allowing 
something like this to be similar to allowing insider trading.
     
Regards,
Peter Stern
Toronto, Canada
     

Author:   at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  2:04 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed reg FD: File#S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
I am in favor of fair distribution of info instead of stockbrokers getting it 
first.
Georgia P. Swan
Cygnet Sales, Inc. 

Author:  "Howard Trevor"  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  6:55 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Rule FD-File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
Dear Sirs,
     
Kindly log my opposition to any form of "Selective Disclosure" and let it be 
known that I expect and demand that full information be made available to myself
and other private investors.
     
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.  
     
Howard Trevor
Moultonborough, New Hampshire
     

Author:  Ed Zoolalian  at Internet
Date:    04/29/2000  10:03 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents 
We favor passage of this proposition.
     
Denise & Ed Zoolalian
981 Briarcliff Road, Monrovia, CA 91016