From: hgbjr [mailto:hgbjr@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:08 AM To: marketreg@sec.gov Subject: File No. SR-NASD-2004-044 - Proposed Amendments Relating to Short Sale Delivery Requirements Ms. Margaret H. McFarland Deputy Secretary Division of Market Regulation Ms. Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 {Via electronic Mail: marketreg@sec.gov} Dear Ms. McFarland and Ms. England: I am an attorney in North Carolina. I am writing to request information as to the status of NASD's Proposed Rule Change, submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission as File No. SR-NASD-2004-044 - "Proposed Amendments Relating to Short Sale Delivery Requirements" on or about March 9, 2004 (the "Proposed Rule"). Specifically, when might we expect that the Proposed Rule will be published in the Federal Register? Does the SEC intend to seek comments on the Proposed Rule, or to publish it as filed by the NASD? Are you able to give a time frame as to the approval process for the Proposed Rule, i.e., when may the public expect that the Proposed Rule will be made effective (not including the 60 day notice to NASD members and the 90 day implementation period, each proposed by NASD)? Thank you in advance for any information you can provide with respect to the Proposed Rule. Given current market conditions in the small- and microcap markets, the Proposed Rule is very timely and a brilliant solution to the many problems that arise from prolonged settlement failures, especially the facts that (i) responsibility for timely settlement is placed at the clearing firm level, and (ii) that market makers can only get extensions for naked short sales to fulfill customer orders, as opposed to naked short sales made as a trading strategy (which is of course not "bona fide market making" anyway). My one concern with the Proposed Rule is that some NASD member firms will continue to disguise short sales as "long" sales and attempt to evade the time requirements of the Proposed Rule thereby. But over all, the Proposed Rule should result in fewer purposeful settlement failures and less resulting market manipulation, again especially manipulation by the market makers themselves. Very Truly Yours, H. Glenn Bagwell, Jr., Esq.