Date: 08/24/2000 10:47 AM Subject: S7-13-00 I am writing to protest the proposed "scope of services rule" being considered by the SEC. In the interest of improving CPAs' independence, the SEC proposes to limit the ability of CPA firms to provide non-attest services to attest clients. The decision to move forward with this rule is not based on facts or empirical evidence. No evidence has been presented that suggests that a broad scope of services impairs audit effectiveness. If this rule is enacted, small registrants such as those served by our firm will find it increasingly difficult to obtain cost effective audit services. By forcing a company to chose to hire a firm solely as its auditor or solely as its provider of consulting services, the rule could cause a company to engage providers of one or the other type of services who are less qualified than the single-source firm with whom the company had previously dealt on an exclusive basis. The rule would even go so far as effectively banning a CPA firm from acting as its audit client's advocate before the IRS. Regional alliances or cooperative agreements between accounting firms could result in each firm being required to be independent of each other firm's attest clients. The resulting impairment of the effectiveness of these types of alliances would limit middle market companies' access to the broad range of services offered by these alliances, which individual member firms might not be able to provide on their own. In conclusion, the SEC's proposal attempts to fix a problem that does not exist. Our profession has successfully provided investors with reliable, independent data they need tom make investment decisions for over a century. The SEC rule would have a governmental agency tell CPA firms what services they may offer and tell those firms' clients from whom they can buy services. This represents an unwarranted intrusion into the free market system. This scope of services rule must not be allowed to go forward. JEFF Jeffrey P. Maxwell MOSS ADAMS LLP