Date: 09/18/2000 12:56 PM Subject: S7-13-00 I have become aware of the proposed SEC ruling that would prohibit CPA firms who conduct audits for SEC clients from providing other, non-audit services to these clients. I have read the proposal and urge you not adopt it. Although I do not have any audit or SEC clients, I believe that the proposal is damaging to the CPA profession as a whole, and, in turn, to their clients and the general public. There is no evidence that non-audit services have compromised audit quality or auditor independence. A study that was conducted at the request of the SEC by the Panel for Audit Effectiveness of the Public Oversight Board and concluded that "both the profession and the quality of audits are fundamentally sound". It also concluded that in numerous instances non-audit services contributed to a more effective audit. My fear for the profession is that if this proposal is approved other regulatory agencies will use this as a model for their regulations. It could seriously harm the way accounting firms today do business and be contrary to the public interest. Restrictions on non-audit services will make firms overly dependent on auditing fees, which is certain to increase their costs to their clients. It also could possibly degrade the accounting profession itself, as audit professionals will not want to work at a firm where 25% - 40% of the market is "off-limits", and the same is true for non-audit professionals. "Audit-only" firms will have difficulty in attracting and retaining the best and the brightest, and this could cause deterioration of audit quality. This proposal represents a fundamental restructuring of a profession that has long and honorably served investors. It seems an unnecessary and overly restrictive attempt by a government agency to tell a profession what service they may offer and to whom. I do not want the SEC adopting rules such as this and I believe most Americans do not either. Sincerely, Beth Boyd,CPA