Date: 09/20/2000 11:00 AM Subject: File #S7-13-00 I would like to express my deep concern regarding the proposed rule changes initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). If the rule is approved as currently proposed, accounting firms performing audits for SEC registrants, and perhaps non-public clients, might ultimately be prohibited from providing any audit client with most non-audit services. This restructuring of the accounting profession would seriously impair our firms ability to perform services to our current clients, and will severely limit our future clients. I feel this proposal has far reaching implications, with profound consequences for the future of the accounting profession and would adversely affect all accounting firms and companies, public and private. The SEC has decided to move forward with this proposal without any evidence or facts that non-audit services have compromised audit quality or auditor independence, nor ever caused an audit failure. The Panel on Audit Effectiveness of the Public Oversight Board, formed at the request of the SEC, concluded that both the profession and the quality of audits are fundamentally sound. The panel could find no evidence of non-audit services hurting audit quality. The panel in fact concluded that in most cases, non-audit services contributed to a more effective audit. Placing these restrictions on audit clients and CPAs could have an adverse effect on the quality of an audit. For CPAs working in industry, this is not good news because it would restrict public companies' freedom of choice when seeking outside professional services. This proposal would force public companies to choose a firm solely for its auditing abilities or as a provider of other services. Also, public companies would be compelled to dismiss an audit firm that has done consistently outstanding work in order to obtain services from the auditor's non-audit colleagues. Even though the proposal "would not affect tax-related services" to audit clients, it would ban acting as an advocate for an audit client, or providing expert services in administrative proceedings, thus potentially prohibiting CPAs from representing audit clients before the IRS. The most dangerous aspect of this proposal is this rule would set a precedent for other regulators to follow. This new rule would be the model on state boards of accountancy as well as federal (e.g., banking and ERISA) and other regulators. This could also influence the regulatory approach to auditor independence outside the United States. There would be a negative effect on recruiting and retaining top professionals. The best and brightest students will not be drawn to a firm with limited opportunities. This fact alone will seriously impair the growth of the overall accounting profession. Students realizing the limitations could possibly seek other industries with broader career opportunities. Ahlbeck & Company, a well-established accounting firm continues to broaden our client base in the Chicago area and beyond as we focus on responding to the needs of our clients. Our clients vary in size from sole entrepreneurs to large corporations, and our industry base ranges from non-profits and tax-exempt organizations to wholesalers, retailers and professional service firms. This proposal would seriously handicap the services we currently offer our clients, and in effect, would do considerable damage to our current client base. We pride ourselves on the variety of services we offer our clients and we are dedicated to provide exceptional personalized client service in response to their individual needs. We have dedicated a great deal of time and effort in attracting and retaining top employees in the accounting field. This proposal would cause some of our best employees to seek employment elsewhere if they are restricted in services we provide. Thank you for the opportunity to share my concerns. Very truly yours, * Dirk AHLBECK & COMPANY CERTIFIED 1665 ELK BOULEVARD PUBLIC DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS ACCOUNTANTS 60016-4798 DIRK T. AHLBECK