Subject: File No. S7-10-97 Date: 06/06/1997 7:01 PM BankBoston Investor Services, Inc. 100 Federal Street Boston, MA 02110 June 6, 1997 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 450 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20549-6009 Re: Registration Form Used by Open-End Management Investment Companies, File No. S7-10-97 Dear Mr. Katz: BankBoston Investor Services, Inc. appreciates this opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments to Form N-1A set forth in Release No. 33-7398 (Feb. 27, 1997). BankBoston Investor Services, Inc. is a registered broker/dealer and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BankBoston, N.A., a national bank that, together with its affiliates, has approximately $65 billion of assets as of March 31, 1997. BankBoston, N.A. serves as investment adviser to Boston 1784 Funds, a registered open-end management investment company, and sales of Boston 1784 Funds make up an important part of BankBoston Investor Services, Inc.'s business. Proposed Item 2(c)(1)(iv) provides that, if the Fund is not a Money Market Fund but is advised by or sold through a bank, the risk/return summary must state that "An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency." We believe that the risks of customer confusion are just as great for customers of nonbank broker/dealers as for customers of bank broker/dealers, and that similar measures to combat customer confusion are appropriate. A recent survey of mutual fund shareholders conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency shows that customer confusion extends across all distribution channels, including the broker/dealer distribution channel. Mutual Fund Shareholders: Characteristics, Investor Knowledge, and Sources of Information (June 24, 1996). Of investors who bought mutual fund shares, 13.3% who purchased through the bank distribution channel and 12.3% of all investors believed that investors cannot lose money in a bond fund, while 20.1% of bank channel investors and 20.5% of all investors believed that investors cannot lose money in a money market fund. Id. table 15A. The same study found that 36.4% of bank channel investors and 33.1% of all investors believed that money market funds are insured. Id. table 34A. The differences between bank channel investors and all investors were not statistically significant. Since investor misunderstandings are substantially the same across all channels, we believe that efforts to address those misunderstandings should also be the same across all channels. Accordingly, we believe that Item 2(c)(1)(iv) should apply to every Fund that is not a Money Market Fund, not just Funds that are advised by or sold through a bank. Requiring this disclosure for some Funds but not for others may aggravate the problem by leading unsophisticated investors who compare prospectuses to believe that Funds without the disclosure are insured. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this important issue. If you would like to discuss these comments further, please do not hesitate to call me at 617/434-9471, or John Baker of our Law Office at 617/434-8796. Very truly yours, Richard E. Horn Vice President