From: Ron Ennis
Sent: August 10, 2006
Subject: File No. S7-03-04

SEC Chairman Christopher Cox

Dear SEC Chairman Cox,

In recent months, the Wall Street Journal has documented how the mutual fund industry rubber stamps excessive CEO compensation.
They sit quietly at company annual meetings, rarely questioning the hugh payouts, the stock options and other perks routinely handout to the corporate chiefs.

In return, look at the measly stock market gains hard-working Americans receive. After peaking at 11,700 in January 2000, the Dow still has a long way to go. As for the Nasdaq, one wonders if we will see 5,000 in our lifetime.

And yet, the CEO pay machine keeps humming along. All gain, never any pain. Some of them don't even flinch when they axe their own workers pensions.

Mutual funds are an increasingly important savings vehicle for tens of millions of working Americans like me. We are the owners of these funds and we bear the risks if they are dominated by self-interested insiders. We look to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to protect us. I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed rule requiring that mutual fund boards have an independent chairperson and at least 75 percent independent directors. These rules were among the most important reforms adopted by the SEC in the wake of the mutual fund trading and sales abuse scandals.

A recent study by AFSCME and The Corporate Library found mutual funds provide a rubber stamp for excessive management pay, supporting more than three-quarters of all management pay proposals. Ninety percent of institutional investors think the current system overpays executives. We need independent directors to stand up to the excesses of the money managers.

The Investment Company Act requires that mutual funds be managed in the interests of their shareholders. Requiring independent directors and chairpersons will help ensure this safeguard for the small investor, to make sure the little person gets a fair shake.


Ron Ennis