Date: 09/29/2000 10:43 AM Subject: Release No. 34-42037; File No. S7-24-99) Dear Sirs: You have a serious perception problem building in how the OTCBB market is being run: a problem ruining investor confidence and destroying the very market itself through inaction on your part and lack of regulatory guideposts. 'Naked' shorting by professional MM's may have legitimacy when small cap B-plans are underfunded or too dangerous to warrant taking block positions with firm assets. They have valid concerns of risk and loss of assets making markets--thus a need to borrow shares to maintain liquidity. The virtue of these lax standards carried with it a gurantee from MM's to maintain the market while reducing their exposure to loss. Unfortunately, with these privileges and lack of oversight comes the promise of abuse--abuse not easily detected nor countered. Abuse not being monitored by your offices due to supposed 'lack of regulatory authority'. Abuses all to apparant to small retail investors who watch their micro-cap issues self-destruct on positive earnings reports, heavy 'buy' side ticker sales, superlative PR and high growth prospects. Destroyed seemingly by the very professionals assigned over their dominion--the naked shorting MM's. Naked shorting stock they don't own and borrow to maintain liquidity. Stock they may not even 'borrow' at all, causing exploding floats, and all justified in the name of maintain 'liquidity'. Stock they cover in inexplicable ways, if ever--but can't be known because there is no way to find out. A rigged market where the dealer controls the cards, stacks the deck, deals as he sees fit, raise and lowers the pot as needed, and adds cards whenever he needs his hand goosed. Anybody playing in this card game is lost from the point of buy-in. Perhaps this is not the case--but I assure you the general public perception is not that. Read the message boards, there is a growing sense that investing in OTCBB securities is not simply risky--it's downright insane. Nobody would play in Las Vegas on a rigged machine--the volume dropoff on the exchange this year may be due to a growing realization by the public playing this particular game that it is just a pointless and very expensive lesson in futility. We need your help--we need you involved--we need the whole process looked at from a 21st century perspective and not from the guilded age. You are the only ones who can--or you'll see more of us leave--for good. Thomas P. Luke