FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 98-74 SEC, FTC and NASAA Crack Down on Fraud in the Entertainment Industry, File Dozens of Fraud Cases in Federal and State Courts Washington, DC, August 11, 1998 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission today joined forces with the Federal Trade Commission and the North American Securities Administrators Association in filing dozens of fraud cases against scam artists in the entertainment industry. The SEC filed four cases in Federal court, three in Los Angeles and one in Salt Lake City. One of the Los Angeles cases is under seal and cannot be discussed at this time. Richard H. Walker, Director of the SEC's Enforcement Division, said, "Investment opportunities come in all shapes and sizes. So, too, does fraud. Scam artists are forever seeking novel ways to rip people off. Witness the rise in microcap stock scams on the Internet. The cases we bring today are a shot across the bow of present and future fraudsters: First, whether they work on Wall Street or in Hollywood, we're going to catch them; second, fraud on the Internet and in the microcap market will not be tolerated; and third, with the help of investors who do their homework before they buy securities, the SEC can help prevent fraud before it happens." Mr. Walker commented on the importance of teaming with other agencies, saying, "The cases we present today demonstrate the SEC's desire to work closely with fellow regulators and enforcement agencies to bring maximum resources to bear on fraud in the markets." Mr. Walker also noted the crucial role that investors play in preventing fraud and policing the markets. He said, "When a stranger calls you at home guaranteeing unbelievable returns on your investment, or when a glossy package arrives in your mailbox promising a deal that's just too good to pass up, remember that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is a scam. Before you buy securities from a stranger check with the SEC or your state's securities administrator to make sure the investment is registered. If not registered, your investment will involve less disclosure and more risk. And importantly, read the prospectus before making an investment and ask questions if you don't understand something. With this type of teamwork we'll be able to stop the fraudsters before they claim their next victim." Summary of the three cases brought by the SEC: I. Operation: Desert Gold The first case involves the production of a motion picture called Operation: Desert Gold. The SEC alleges that between November 1995 and December 1997, the defendants raised approximately $8 million by selling general partnership units to about 600 investors nationwide. The defendants represented that investor funds would be used to produce and distribute a motion picture entitled "Operation: Desert Gold" and that investors could potentially earn a 160-445 percent return. However, the defendants misused investors' funds by transferring most of the funds to themselves and their affiliates. To date, no movie has been produced and all of the investors' funds have been spent. II. Casino Cruises The second case involves cruise ship gambling. The Commission has sued seven individuals who used a fraudulent stock scheme to raise nearly one million dollars from more than one hundred investors nationwide. Between June 1997 and January 1998, investors were told that Casino Cruises and BRW Leasing Services would operate the first gaming cruise ship off the coast of Southern California by Summer 1998. Well, the Summer of `98 is nearly gone and no ship has been purchased. Instead, the individuals paid about $100,000 in commissions to sales agents and kept nearly a half million dollars for themselves. III. American Gladiators Live Performances The third case involves attempts to stage live performances of American Gladiators. The SEC alleges that Chariot Entertainment violated various provisions of federal securities law in its attempts to finance the American Gladiators stage shows outside a Las Vegas hotel. The shows were never produced. Chariot sought to go public by merging with a shell company listed on NASDAQ. To meet NASDAQ listing requirements, the defendants developed and executed a scheme to acquire $5 million in certificates of deposit, ostensibly issued by a Russian bank, but in reality created at a Kinko's copy shop in Florida. Chariot was to finance acquisition of the CDs through the sale of newly issued stock which superficially met the requirements of Regulation S, but which was actually issued to a California corporation. Finally, Chariot failed to disclose that it violated its lease agreement with the Las Vegas hotel by failing to obtain a performance bond and to make required payments. # # #