U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
SEC Seal
Home | Previous Page
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

SEC Charges New York Firms and Chief Compliance Officer for Inadequate Procedures to Protect Nonpublic Information

One of the Firms Also Charged With Altering Compliance Records During SEC Examination


Washington, D.C., Nov. 17, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged two affiliated New York-based firms and their former chief compliance officer with failing to have adequate policies and procedures to prevent misuse of nonpublic information.

One of the firms - investment adviser Buckingham Capital Management Inc. (BCM) - also is charged with supplementing and altering its records prior to turning them over to SEC examination staff, which prevented the exam staff from discovering BCM's failure to follow its compliance procedures.

In administrative proceedings against BCM and its broker-dealer parent company, The Buckingham Research Group Inc. (BRG), the SEC found that the firms failed to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent misuse of material, nonpublic information, including forthcoming BRG research reports. The former chief compliance officer for both firms, Lloyd Karp, was charged with aiding and abetting and causing the failures.

The firms and Karp agreed to settle the SEC's cases against them.

"BRG and BCM's policies did not adequately address the risk that research reports and other nonpublic information could be misused," said Antonia Chion, Associate Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "This case also makes clear that when a firm is notified of an SEC exam, it must produce all the records the SEC staff requests as they exist, without changes or additions."

BRG provides equity research to hedge funds, broker-dealers, and other institutional customers and is known for its research in the retail, apparel, and footwear industry, which is the primary focus of BCM's investments. The firms share common office space and management, and BCM's trading accounts for approximately 25 percent of BRG's commission revenue.

In its order instituting administrative proceedings, the SEC found that when BCM began preparing for an SEC examination in 2006, the firm discovered that it was missing pre-approval forms for more than 100 employee trades. Instead of producing the incomplete employee trading records to the SEC exam staff, BCM created new forms to replace the missing ones. BCM then produced the existing records along with the newly-created forms to the SEC examination staff without telling the staff what it had done. BCM also replaced incomplete compliance logs with newly-created completed logs and turned the completed logs over to SEC staff without disclosing what had been done. These compliance documents were particularly important because they were intended to address deficiencies identified in an earlier SEC exam of the firm.

The Commission found that whenever there was a material research event, BRG's written policy required research analysts to complete a certification form attesting that they had maintained confidentiality of the material research information. However, in practice, BRG required an analyst to complete a certification form only where a BCM portfolio had traded in the same direction as the research. Moreover, in some instances, analyst certifications were lacking, incomplete, or dated long after the research event had occurred.

The Commission also found that, until May 2009, BCM's written policy required that people with access to material, nonpublic information report "all business, financial or personal relationships that may result in access to material, non-public information." However, BCM required employees to report only relationships that actually did result in access to material, nonpublic information. BCM also failed to conduct the required annual review of its policies and procedures for 2005.

Without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, BRG agreed to pay a $50,000 penalty, BCM agreed to pay a $75,000 penalty, and Karp agreed to pay a $35,000 penalty. They also consented to an order that censures all of the respondents; requires BRG to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or future violations of Section 15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; requires BCM to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 204(a), 204A and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder; and requires Karp to cease and desist from causing any violations and any future violations of Section 15(f) of the Exchange Act and Sections 204A and 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder. The order also requires that both firms engage an independent consultant to review and make recommendations regarding their compliance policies and procedures.

Kara Brockmeyer, Shelley Grant, William Max Hathaway and Thomas Swiers in the SEC's Enforcement Division in Washington conducted the investigation.

# # #

For more information about this enforcement action, contact:

Antonia Chion
Associate Director, SEC Division of Enforcement
(202) 551-4842

Kara N. Brockmeyer
Assistant Director, SEC Division of Enforcement
(202) 551-4767



Modified: 11/17/2010