SEC NEWS DIGEST Issue 2002-24 February 5, 2002 COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS SEC GENERAL COUNSEL TO LEAVE COMMISSION The Commission announced today that General Counsel David M. Becker will leave the Commission to return to the private sector. Becker came to the Commission in 1998 as deputy general counsel and has been the agency's chief legal officer since January 2000. During his tenure, he helped shape most of the Commission's major policy and regulatory initiatives and counseled the Commission on virtually every matter that has come before it. Becker has not yet accepted another position and will remain with the Commission for a short period to assist with the transition to a new general counsel. "David has been a singular force for the protection of investors and for the rule of law, Chairman Harvey L. Pitt said. "Virtually every major action the Commission has taken over the past two years bears the imprint of his intellectual rigor and outstanding judgment. The Commission and the staff will miss his wise and warm counsel. I am profoundly sad that he is leaving." Becker said, "I leave the Commission with the greatest regret. Though I had expected to leave the Commission many months ago, Chairman Pitt's leadership and friendship made my decision to leave at this time especially difficult. It has been a privilege to play a role in protecting investors and a joy to work with dedicated and talented colleagues in the Office of General Counsel and throughout the Commission staff. I owe particular thanks to Chairmen Pitt, Unger, and Levitt and the Commissioners under whom I've served. I will be forever grateful for their confidence, leadership, and support." Becker joined the Commission in October 1998, from the law firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, where he was a partner. Becker began his legal career as law clerk to Judge Harold Leventhal of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and for Associate Justice (Retired) Stanley Reed of the Supreme Court. He is a graduate of Columbia College and Columbia Law School, where he was editor-in-chief of the Columbia Law Review. (Press Rel. 2001-20) COMMISSION MEETINGS CHANGE IN THE MEETING: CANCELLATION OF MEETING/ADDITIONAL MEETINGS The closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, February 6, 2002, has been cancelled, and rescheduled for Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 10:00 a.m. Additional closed meetings will be held on Tuesday, February 12, 2002 and Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:00 a.m. CLOSED MEETING - TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002 - 10:00 A.M. The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 12, will be: Litigation matter; Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; Formal orders of investigation; and Adjudicatory matters. CLOSED MEETING - THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2002 - 10:00 A.M. The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 14, will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; and Formal orders of investigation. At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070. ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT WEEKS, DAVID HESTERMAN AND KENNETH WEEKS On February 4, an Administrative Law Judge issued an initial decision in the matter of Robert G. Weeks, David A. Hesterman, and Kenneth L. Weeks. The Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP) charged that Robert G. Weeks, David A. Hesterman, and Kenneth L. Weeks (Respondents) took control of Dynamic American Corporation, a Utah corporation, exercised authority over the company's nominal officers and directors, and baselessly inflated its assets. The OIP further charged that Respondents disseminated false and misleading statements regarding the company's assets and operations, sold shares of the company's stock without a registration statement, failed to file stock ownership reports, and caused the company's reporting and recordkeeping violations. The administrative proceedings were instituted in order to determine whether the allegations in the OIP were true and, if so, whether remedial sanctions ought to be imposed against the Respondents in the public interest. The initial decision sustains the charges. As relief, the initial decision sanctions the Respondents through civil penalties, disgorgement, cease-and-desist orders, and bars from participating in any offering of penny stock. (Initial Decision No. 199; File No. 3- 9952) COMMISSION GRANTED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER IN CONNECTION WITH INTERNET STOCK MANIPULATION THAT USED FALSE ANALYST'S "BUY" RECOMMENDATION On February 1, the Commission filed an emergency action to halt an Internet "pump and dump" manipulation of New Energy Corp. stock (New Energy). Previously, on January 18, 2002, the Commission temporarily suspended trading in New Energy securities (OTC BB: NECO) because of questions concerning the adequacy and accuracy of publicly disseminated information. Late Friday afternoon, the Honorable Margaret M. Morrow, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, issued a temporary restraining order halting the manipulative scheme. Named in the emergency action are: New Energy, a San Diego startup company that markets solar generators; Marcelino Colt (Colt), a Panamanian citizen residing in Panama and Mexico, who claims to be an investment banker; Geneva Financial Ltd. (Geneva), a Nevis corporation which purports to be an international investment banker; Magnum Financial, LLC, dba Stratos Research LLC (Magnum), a California limited liability company that provides public and investor relations services; Michael S. Manahan (Manahan), age 46, of Harbor City, California, who is Magnum's president; and Tor Ewald (Ewald), age 36, of La Jolla, California, who is New Energy's Secretary, Treasurer, and largest shareholder. The Commission's complaint alleges that Colt orchestrated an Internet scheme, including the hiring of an investor relations firm to post a false and misleading buy recommendation, the distribution of mass e- mails or spam containing fraudulent statements, and posting a false and misleading press release onto New Energy's website. The scheme artificially inflated New Energy's stock price 122%, from $4.75 on December 19, 2001 to a high of $10 per share on January 9, 2002, and continuing until January 18, 2002, when the Commission suspended trading. During the "pump," Colt, Geneva and other members of the scheme sold their New Energy shares into the rising market. The False Research Report. At Colt's urging, as the complaint further alleges, New Energy hired Manahan and his investor relations firm, Magnum, to post a purported stock analyst's research report onto the Internet about New Energy under the name of Magnum's research arm, Stratos Research LLC (Stratos). The Commission further alleges that Magnum merely copied a research report that Colt supplied to it, without doing any actual analysis or investigation. Magnum's research report touts New Energy in glowing terms stating: "This is one of the highest recommended BUYS ever published." (Emphasis in the original) The research report makes at least five false and misleading statements, including false and misleading claims regarding a relationship with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP), negotiations with Coca- Cola bottlers in Mexico for thermal generators, and false claims that New Energy's partner had a "virtual lock" on the world market for high concentration (HCPV) solar cells (emphasis in the original). The False Press Release. The Commission further alleges that, on January 3, 2002, New Energy issued a press release containing false and misleading statements about a contract between New Energy and an agricultural packaging concern. The release, which was posted onto New Energy's website, falsely claims that the contract was for 10 years with a potential to supply up to 100 megawatts of power. In fact, the Commission alleges, the contract is only for five years, with the potential for only 10 megawatts of power. The Commission further alleges that the press release contains a made-up quote purportedly from the agricultural packaging concern's president. Post Trading Suspension Press Releases. The complaint alleges that Ewald failed to take any action to correct the false statements in the research report and press release. The Commission further alleges that on January 31, 2002, the defendants posted two additional press releases onto the Internet which perpetuated the fraudulent scheme. The first press release, listing New Energy as the source, claims to correct the January 3 press release but fails to correct the key false and misleading claims about the contract, namely its duration and the actual planned needs of the customer, and fails to acknowledge that the January 3 press release contains a made-up quote from New Energy's purported customer. The second press release, listing Stratos as the source, states that the research report has been withdrawn temporarily pending review and that the report "may" contain errors, even though, as the Commission alleges, the defendants previously admitted to the false statements. On Friday, the Court: (1) granted the Commission's application for a temporary restraining order; (2) froze the assets of several of the defendants; (3) prohibited the destruction of documents by the defendants; (4) ordered accountings from several of the defendants; and (5) granted expedited discovery. A hearing on whether a preliminary injunction should be issued against the defendants is scheduled for February 11, 2002. The Commission obtained an order temporarily restraining the defendants from committing securities fraud in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The order also temporarily restrains Geneva and Colt from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to the interim relief granted Friday, the Commission seeks a final judgment against the defendants enjoining them from future violations of the foregoing antifraud provisions, and ordering Geneva and Colt to disgorge all ill- gotten gains, and assessing civil penalties against them. The Commission also sought and obtained an order temporarily freezing the assets of relief defendants Hector Campa (Campa), of San Ysidro, California; Burke T. Maxfield (Maxfield), age 52, of Kaysville, Utah; York Chandler (Chandler), of Salt Lake City, Utah; Barclay Davis (Barclay), age 54, of Las Vegas, Nevada; and his wife, Loretta Davis (Loretta), age 58, also of Las Vegas, Nevada, who together received more than $440,000 in cash and New Energy stock from Geneva and Colt during the scheme. The Commission also seeks a final judgment against Campa, Maxfield, Chandler, Barclay and Loretta, ordering them to disgorge all ill-gotten gains. The Commission does not allege that these relief defendants violated the securities laws, but rather that they received proceeds from the fraud. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the National Association of Securities Dealers in this investigation. For tips on how to avoid Internet investment schemes, visit: http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/cyberfraud.htm. For more information about Internet fraud, visit: http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm. To report suspicious activity involving possible Internet fraud, visit: http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml. [SEC v. New Energy Corp., Tor Ewald, Geneva Financial Ltd., Marcelino Colt aka Marcelino Colt Vasquez, Magnum Financial, LLC, Michael S. Manahan, BLD Trust, Barclay Davis, Loretta Davis, Burke T. Maxfield, York Chandler, and Hector Campa Acedo, Civil Action No. CV-02-989-MMM (CWx) (C.D. Cal.)] (LR-17350) PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISGORGEMENT ORDERED AGAINST JAMES SHERET, JR. The Commission announced that on September 27, 2001, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction Against Defendant James Sheret, Jr. Sheret engaged in multiple fraudulent and deceptive schemes to profit from his touting and trading of the stocks of thinly traded public companies over the Internet. Sheret, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, consented to the order which permanently enjoins and restrains him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by engaging in fraudulent activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. Sheret was also ordered to pay disgorgement in the amount of $378,037 and a penalty of $110,000. [SEC v James Sheret, Jr. and Glenn E. Conley, Civil Action No. 00 Civ 1411, LTS, USDC, SDNY] (LR- 17351) JURY FINDS P. BRENDEN GEBBEN LIABLE FOR UNLAWFUL STOCK TOUTING; JUDGE DIRECTS VERDICT FOR THE COMMISSION AGAINST GEBBEN FOR SECURITIES FRAUD On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, after deliberating for two hours, a jury in the federal district court for the Central District of Illinois in Springfield, Illinois, found that defendant P. Brenden Gebben (Gebben) violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), the anti-touting provision of the Securities Act. The previous day, on January 29, 2002, U.S. District Court Judge Jeanne E. Scott directed a verdict in the Commission's favor on its claim that Gebben violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Gebben was the "Lead Analyst" and "Assistant Director of Research and Communications" of Strategic Investment Advisory (SIA), a company based in Springfield, Illinois. The Commission's complaint alleged that Gebben, along with co-defendants Wayne F. Gorsek, Lyndell Parks, and Troy Justus, fraudulently promoted approximately 20 microcap companies through SIA. The complaint alleged that SIA deceived investors into believing that it was an independent securities research firm providing objective investment advice about "undiscovered" companies. In fact, the SEC alleged, SIA was merely a paid promotional firm that uncritically published glowingly optimistic recommendations of the securities of its clients in exchange for cash and securities. In April 2001, Judge Scott granted the Commission's motion for summary judgment and found co-defendants Gorsek and Parks liable for violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 17(b) of the Securities Act for their conduct at SIA. Previously, the Court entered a consent judgment against co-defendant Justus, and permanently enjoined him from violations of Sections 17(a) and (b) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder The Court will hold further proceedings on the remedy to be imposed against defendants Gebben, Gorsek and Parks. For further information about the Commission's action, see Litigation Release Nos. 16018 and 17010. [SEC v. Wayne F. Gorsek, Lyndell Parks, P. Brenden Gebben and Troy Justus, U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, C.A. No. 99 CV 3072 (JES)] (LR-17352) SEC CHARGES TWO FORMER CRITICAL PATH EXECUTIVES WITH SECURITIES FRAUD The Commission filed a civil action today charging two former executives of Critical Path, Inc., a California company that provides e-mail services, with participating in a scheme to inflate the company's revenues and earnings for fiscal 2000. Named in the complaint were David A. Thatcher, 46, of Rancho Santa Fe, California, the former president of Critical Path, and Timothy J. Ganley, 45, of Aptos, California, a former vice-president of sales at the company. Separately, the Commission instituted and settled an administrative proceeding against Critical Path charging the firm with violations of the periodic reporting, books and records, and internal control provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint filed in the civil action alleges that during 2000 and early 2001 Thatcher and other Critical Path employees caused Critical Path to record revenue from eight fictitious, contingent, or backdated transactions in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2000. As a result, Critical Path improperly recorded revenue totaling approximately $10.8 million during fiscal 2000. During part of that period Thatcher was the acting Chief Financial Officer for the company. As a result of the conduct, the net loss reported by Critical Path in its Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2000 was understated by over 50 percent. On January 18, 2001, Critical Path issued a press release announcing its financial results for 2000, and the improperly recorded revenue was included in the results released, causing Critical Path's net loss for the year to be understated by over 27 percent. Before Critical Path filed its annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2000, the scheme unraveled, and in February 2001, the company announced that it would revise its previously reported results to reverse improperly recorded transactions. Following that announcement, Critical Path's share price plunged approximately 70 percent. The Commission's complaint also charges that Ganley participated in one of the eight transactions, a fictitious sale for which Critical Path improperly recorded revenue of $2 million, and alleges that Ganley then illegally sold 1,300 shares of Critical Path stock in January 2001 based on information he possessed about the fraud and the company's true financial condition. Simultaneously with the filing of the Commission's complaint, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, Thatcher and Ganley consented to the entry of final judgments imposing the relief detailed below. As to Thatcher: * A permanent injunction from violating Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1, and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 13a-13; * Payment of a $110,000 civil penalty for his participation in the financial fraud; and * A five-year bar from acting as an officer or director of a public company. In addition, Thatcher has agreed to the issuance of a Commission order, pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, denying him the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, based on the entry of the injunction. As to Ganley: * A permanent injunction from violating Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1, and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act; * Payment of over $105,900 in penalties and disgorgement, as follows: - disgorgement of the $27,950 loss he avoided by engaging in insider trading, plus prejudgment interest; - a $27,950 civil penalty for insider trading; and - a $50,000 civil penalty for his participation in the fictitious transaction that was part of the financial fraud. In the related administrative proceeding against Critical Path, without admitting or denying the Commission's findings, Critical Path consented to an order finding that the company violated the periodic reporting, books and records, and internal control provisions of the Exchange Act. The order directs Critical Path to cease and desist from committing or causing violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 13a-13. In the Matter of Critical Path, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 34-45393, February 5, 2002. In a related matter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California today announced criminal charges against Thatcher and Ganley. For further information about the U.S. Attorney's Office's actions, please contact that office's press officer, Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Jacobs, at (415) 436-7181, or visit http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/can/press/index.html. The Commission thanks the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for their cooperation in this matter. [SEC v. David A. Thatcher and Timothy J. Ganley, C-02-0621 (SBA), N.D.Cal.] (LR-17353; AAE Rel. 1504); (Administrative Proceeding in the Matter of Critical Path, Inc., Rel. 34- 45393; AAE Rel. 1503; File No. 3-10693) INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT RELEASES CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ET AL. An order has been issued on an application filed by Capital One Financial Corporation (COFC), et al., for an order under Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act exempting certain finance subsidiaries of COFC (Finance Subsidiaries) from all provisions of the Act. The order permits the Finance Subsidiaries to sell securities and use the proceeds to finance the business activities of COFC, and certain companies controlled by COFC. (Rel. IC-25408 - February 4) SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS PROPOSED RULE CHANGE The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board filed a proposed rule change (SR-MSRB-2001-08) relating to official communications, pursuant to MSRB Rules G-15 and G-8. Publication of the proposal is expected in the Federal Register during the week of February 4. (Rel. 34-45363) SECURITIES ACT REGISTRATIONS The following registration statements have been filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933. The reported information appears as follows: Form, Name, Address and Phone Number (if available) of the issuer of the security; Title and the number and/or face amount of the securities being offered; Name of the managing underwriter or depositor (if applicable); File number and date filed; Assigned Branch; and a designation if the statement is a New Issue. Registration statements may be obtained in person or by writing to the Commission's Public Reference Branch at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 or at the following e-mail box address: . In most cases, this information is also available on the Commission's website: . S-8 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC, 2655 SEELY ROAD BLDG 5, SAN JOSE, CA, 95134, 4089431234 - 6,138 ($135,342.90) Equity, (File 333-82044 - Feb. 4) (BR. 03) S-3 PHARMOS CORP, 99 WOOD AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 301, ISELIN, NJ, 08830, 7324529556 - 0 ($25,000,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82046 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01) S-8 AMANDA CO INC, 1601 ALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE, CA, 92606, 9492613131 - 31,289,727 ($312,897.27) Other, (File 333-82048 - Feb. 4) (BR. 03) S-8 RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO, 2550 EAST 25TH ST, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90058, 2135822272 - 812,500 ($21,133,125.00) Equity, (File 333-82060- Feb. 4) (BR. 04) S-8 ERIE INDEMNITY CO, 100 ERIE INSURANCE PL, ERIE, PA, 16530, 8148702000- 95,735 ($3,668,565.20) Equity, (File 333-82062 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01) S-8 DIGITAL INSIGHT CORP, 26025 MUREAU RD, CALABASAS, CA, 93012, 8188710000 - 111,978 ($2,069,353.44) Equity, (File 333-82066 - Feb. 4) (BR. 08) S-8 AMNIS SYSTEMS INC, 289 CHURCH AVENUE, CHULA VISTA, CA, 91910, 6194827177 - 850,000 ($705,500.00) Equity, (File 333-82076 - Feb. 4) (BR. 02) S-3 PHOTRONICS INC, 1061 INDIANTOWN RD, SUITE 318, JUPITER, FL, 33477, 5617451222 - 0 ($200,000,000.00) Debt Convertible into Equity, (File 333-82080 - Feb. 4) (BR. 36) S-8 COOPER CAMERON CORP, 515 POST OAK BLVD, STE 1200, HOUSTON, TX, 77027, 7135133322 - 700,000 ($27,667,500.00) Equity, (File 333-82082 - Feb. 4) (BR. 04) S-4 APPLETON PAPERS INC/WI, 825 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE, APPLETON, WI, 54912-0359, 9207349841 - 0 ($250,000,000.00) Non-Convertible Debt, (File 333-82084 - Feb. 4) (BR. ) S-8 ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT INC, ONE ACCLAIM PLAZA, GLEN COVE, NY, 11542, 5166565000 - 10,000,000 ($36,300,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82088 - Feb. 4) (BR. 03) S-8 ALTIGEN COMMUNICATIONS INC, 47427 FREMONT BLVD, FREMONT, CA, 94538, 5102529712 - 0 ($1,597,181.00) Equity, (File 333-82090 - Feb. 4) (BR. 37) SB-2 JACOBSON RESONANCE ENTERPRISES INC, 9960 CENTRAL PARK BOULEVARD SUITE 302, BOCO RATON, FL, 33428, 5614778020 - 19,546,291 ($4,495,646.93) Equity, (File 333-82092 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01) S-8 NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC, 21720-23RD DRIVE SE, SUITE 100, BOTHELL, WA, 98021, 4256083000 - 4,065,822 ($14,559,304.00) Equity, (File 333-82094 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01) S-8 HESKA CORP, 1613 PROSPECT PARKWAY, FORT COLLINS, CO, 80525, 9704937272 - 1,500,000 ($1,740,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82096 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01) S-8 BACH-HAUSER INC, 2080 E FLAMINGO RD, STE 112, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89119, 7026505660 - 4,720,000 ($236,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82100 - Feb. 4) (BR. 06) S-8 COACH INC, 516 WEST 34TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY, 10001, 2125941950 - 2,400,000 ($111,360,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82102 - Feb. 4) (BR. 02) SB-2 CYBERADS INC, 3350 NW BOCA RATON BLVD, SUITE A44, BOCA RATON, FL, 33431, 446,000 ($1,070,400.00) Equity, (File 333-82104 - Feb. 4) (BR. 07) S-3 GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD, 10579 BRADFORD ROAD, STE 103, LITTLETON, CO, 80127, 3038309000 - 17,964,960 ($12,395,823.00) Equity, (File 333-82106 - Feb. 4) (BR. 04) S-8 CYPOST CORP, 900 1281 WEST GEORGIA STREET, VANCOUVER B C V6E 3J, 6049044422 - 2,000,000 ($500,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82108 - Feb. 4) (BR. 02) S-3 IMPCO TECHNOLOGIES INC, 16804 GRIDLEY PLACE, CERRITOS, CA, 90701, 5628606666 - 2,300,000 ($26,542,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82110 - Feb. 4) (BR. 05) SB-2 SUNSHINE PCS CORP, 350 STUYVESANT AVENUE, RYE, NY, 10580, 9149216300- 1,531,593 ($1,531,593.00) Equity, (File 333-82116 - Feb. 4) (BR. 07) S-8 PC TEL INC, 70 RIO ROBLES, 408-383-0452, SAN JOSE, CA, 95134, 4089652100 - 0 ($8,939,000.00) Equity, (File 333-82120 - Feb. 4) (BR. 03) S-8 INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS INC, 301 CONGRESS AVE, SUITE 1850, AUSTIN, TX, 78701, 5127089310 - 0 ($6,064,423.00) Equity, (File 333-82122 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01) S-3 MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP, 100 CRYSTAL RUN ROAD, MIDDLETOWN, NY, 10941, 9146952600 - 0 ($1,500,000,000.00) Other, (File 333-82124 - Feb. 4) (BR. 07) S-3 KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC, 501 FIFTH ST, BRISTOL, TN, 37620, 4239898000 - 0 ($345,000,000.00) Non-Convertible Debt, (File 333-82126 - Feb. 4) (BR. 01)