U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No 16037 / January 21, 1999 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ASSURED INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SAM E. HARRIS, Civil Action No. 99- 00530 DDP (BQRx) (C.D. Cal.) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that yesterday it sued Assured International Inc. and Sam E. Harris, a repeat securities violator, to stop an on-going securities fraud. The SEC obtained a Temporary Restraining Order and froze the Defendants’ assets. The SEC filed its Complaint in federal district court in Los Angeles. From February 1998 until the SEC obtained the Restraining Order, the Complaint alleges that Assured and Harris raised $828,000 from investors. Assured sought to raise $5,000,000 through the sale of shares of stock. The Defendants sold Assured stock to 82 unsophisticated investors who live throughout the country. Investors were told that Assured, based in Woodland Hills, California, will manufacture and distribute disposable latex gloves. The Commission alleges that sales agents worked in a boiler room calling investors. In their telephone calls, sales agents told investors that Assured’s stock would go public in the first quarter of 1999 and that investors could sell their stock at $5 to $8 per share after the public offering. The Complaint alleges that investors were told that three officers controlled Assured and were never told that Harris is its President and controlled all investor funds. Harris is a repeat securities law violator -- seven states have issued orders against him for securities law violations and the National Association of Securities Dealers censured, fined, and barred him from association with any NASD member. The Complaint further alleges that investors were told that Assured will use investor funds only for marketing and sales of latex products, offering expenses, working capital, and sales commissions. The Complaint charges that Assured has not manufactured or distributed latex products and that Assured and Harris misused investor funds by paying $202,422 -- 24 percent-- of investor funds to Harris. The Complaint seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction, disgorgement, and civil penalties against Assured and Harris for violating the antifraud provisions of the securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Court set the hearing on the SEC’s application for a preliminary injunction for January 29, 1999.