SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. Litigation Release No. 16016 / January 6, 1999 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. THE BETTER LIFE CLUB OF AMERICA, INC., and ROBERT N. TAYLOR, Defendants, and WILKINS MCNAIR, JR., CPA, AS TRUSTEE, and ELIZABETH LAWSON, Relief Defendants, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civ. No. 95-1679 (TFH) On December 14, 1998, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia approved a settlement between the Commission, Wilkins McNair, Jr., and McNair’s Baltimore-based accounting firm. McNair provided accounting services to the Better Life Club of America, Inc., a now-defunct organization used by Robert N. Taylor from 1993 to 1995 to perpetrate a $45 million Ponzi scheme called the Better Life Club "Advertising Pool." In the settlement, McNair agreed to disgorge $120,000 of Better Life Club investor funds he received from Taylor, plus $30,000 in prejudgment interest. Based upon McNair and his firm’s demonstrated inability to pay disgorgement of more than $150,000, the Commission waived payment of further disgorgement obtained in the related court proceedings against McNair and his firm. The money will be paid to a receiver appointed by the court to distribute the remaining Better Life Club assets to the victims of the Ponzi scheme. McNair provided accounting services to the Better Life Club in the spring and summer of 1995. On September 1, 1995, the Commission sued Taylor and the Better Life Club and obtained an order halting the scheme and freezing the defendants’ assets. (See SEC Lit. Rel. No. 14624, Sept. 5, 1995.) In 1996, the Commission added McNair as one of two relief defendants because he received investor funds from Taylor. On February 27, 1998, the court granted the Commission’s motion for summary judgment against the main defendants and the relief defendants. (See SEC Lit. Rel. No. 15660, Mar. 5, 1998.) All of them, including McNair, appealed to the D.C. Circuit.The present settlement requires McNair to withdraw his appeal of the district court’s summary judgment against him.