UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15477 / September 5, 1997 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Infinity Group Company, Geoffrey P. Benson and Geoffrey J. O'Connor, et. al. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 97-CV-5458) On September 4, 1997, the Honorable Stewart Dalzell entered an Order of Preliminary Injunction, Appointment of a Trustee, Freeze of Assets and Other Relief ("Order") against defendants The Infinity Group Company ("TIGC"), Geoffrey P. Benson ("Benson") and Geoffrey J. O'Connor ("O'Connor"). The Order was entered following a two day hearing before Judge Dalzell in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") instituted the civil injunctive action on August 27, 1997. On that same date, the Honorable Anita B. Brody granted the Commission's motion for a temporary restraining order. She also granted a freeze of assets against the defendants as well as six relief defendants. In addition to entering the preliminary injunction, Judge Dalzell continued the freeze of assets ordered by Judge Brody. Pursuant to the Order, he also appointed Robert F. Sanville, C.P.A., Sanville & Company, as trustee for the assets of TIGC, and required the defendants and relief defendants to repatriate all funds and assets held in off-shore bank accounts to Sanville. A trial date of November 20, 1997 has been scheduled. The Commission's complaint alleges that, from at least August 1994 through the present, TIGC, Benson and O'Connor have engaged in a fraudulent scheme through which they have raised at least $5 million, and possibly as much as $9.7 million, from at least 4,200 public investors, including at least 58 investors residing in Philadelphia and the surrounding area. The Complaint alleges that the defendants induced investors to purchase interests in TIGC's "Asset Enhancement Plan" by promising them rates of return ranging from 138 to 181 percent. These returns were portrayed as "guaranteed." Through various offering materials, TIGC, Benson and O'Connor claimed that they could generate these returns by pooling investor funds in TIGC bank accounts and investing them in so-called "Prime Bank" instruments or other unspecified investments. At the preliminary injunction hearing, the Commission presented expert testimony of Professor James Byrne, who testified that the TIGC offering was fraudulent, and that the instruments and investments described in the TIGC offering materials did not exist. The Commission also presented testimony of Staff Accountant Kevin B. de Lacy who testified that, rather than investing the proceeds as represented, TIGC, Benson and O'Connor diverted the money to various bank accounts, where some or all of it was misappropriated. Substantial sums were diverted to accounts under their control or under the control of the six relief defendants. Mr. de Lacy further testified that funds raised in the TIGC offering were used to pay existing investors or were diverted to off-shore bank accounts in St. Kitts, West Indies, Spain and the Principality of Monaco. To date, the Commission has confirmed that more than $3 million in assets has been frozen. ======END OF PAGE 2======