UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15444 / August 15, 1997 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. DHIREIN PATEL, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Civil Action No. 97-CV-74151 (E.D. Mich. August 13, 1997) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on August 13, 1997, it filed a Complaint for Permanent Injunction in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against Dhirein Patel, a resident of Troy, Michigan. The Complaint alleges that Patel, while employed at CUC International, Inc., a company based in Stamford, Connecticut, engaged in trading of stock in Advance Ross Corporation while in possession of material, nonpublic information concerning CUC's proposed acquisition of Advance Ross. Advance Ross was formerly a publicly-held company based in Chicago, Illinois and is now wholly-owned by CUC. Patel has consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, to the entry of Final Judgment and Order of Permanent Injunction which will enjoin him from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Final Judgment will also require Patel to disgorge his profits of $10,390 plus prejudgment interest and to pay a civil penalty of $10,390 pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act. In its Complaint, the Commission alleges that in late September or early October of 1995, Patel, who was CUC's Director of Taxes, was informed confidentially by his supervisor at CUC that the company was in negotiations to purchase all the outstanding stock of Advance Ross. The Complaint further alleges that, On October 16, 1995, when CUC's proposed acquisition of Advance Ross was still nonpublic, Patel purchased 1,000 shares of Advance Ross stock. According to the Complaint, on October 18, 1995, Advance Ross and CUC publicly announced CUC's intended purchase of Advance Ross' stock. The Complaint alleges that, as a result, the stock price of Advance Ross closed up approximately $11 1/4 per share from the previous day's close. The Complaint alleges that Patel received profits of $10,390 as a result of this price increase. ======END OF PAGE 1======