SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. Litigation Release No. 15442 / August 15, 1997 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ABDUL ISMAIL, ONG CONGQIN BOBBY, AND LUM KWAN SUNG, 97 Civ. 2664 (U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y.) (JSM) The Securities and Commission announced today that it has voluntarily dismissed its civil insider trading claim against Abdul Ismail, a London businessman. Ismail is one of three defendants in a civil insider trading action involving purchases of the securities of APL Limited in advance of the public announcement, on April 13, 1997, that the company would be acquired in a merger with Neptune Orient Lines Ltd. Using a numbered Swiss bank account, Ismail bought approximately $228,000 of APL stock options on April 11, 1997, which nearly doubled in value after the merger was announced two days later. The Commission filed suit against Ismail as an unknown purchaser and obtained a court order freezing his trading proceeds on April 15, 1997. The Commission also sued a second, known defendant (Ong Congqin Bobby) in its April 15 complaint, and added a third, known defendant (Lum Kwan Sung) on April 25. Because the Swiss bank through which Ismail traded refused to divulge his identity, the Commission s staff was unable to interview him before the action was filed. Since then, the staff has conducted a thorough investigation of his trading, including questioning him in a deposition. Based on all of the evidence gathered since the case was filed, the Commission has determined that it lacks sufficient evidence to continue prosecuting its claim against Ismail at this time. Under the terms of the dismissal, the freeze on Ismail s trading proceeds will be lifted immediately. The dismissal is without prejudice, which means that the Commission would be permitted to refile its claim should it uncover additional evidence. The Commission s dismissal of its claim against Ismail does not affect its pending claims against defendants Ong and Lum or the court s orders freezing the proceeds of their APL securities purchases. Those defendants have consented to extend the freezes on their accounts through dates in September 1997. No hearing or trial dates on the SEC s claims against them have yet been scheduled. ======END OF PAGE 1======