U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. Litigation Release No. 15412 / July 16, 1997 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GRAY HAWK FUND COMPANY, a Delaware limited liability company; SALVATORE A. VECCHIO; AND FREDRICK J. RICE, Civil Action No. 97-5125 RAP (AJWx) On July 15, 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in federal district court in Los Angeles against Gray Hawk Fund Company, an oil and gas limited liability company based in Woodland Hills, California, and its principals, Salvatore A. Vecchio, age 51, of Los Angeles, California, and Fredrick J. Rice, age 38, of Simi Valley, California. The Commission alleges that, from August 1994 through January 1996, the defendants perpetrated a fraudulent investment scheme through which they raised approximately $1,055,000 from the sale of Gray Hawk securities to 75 investors nationwide, most of whom were elderly. Vecchio and Rice misrepresented the use of investor proceeds and misused $474,500 of investor funds, $179,350 of which was used for their own personal benefit. Vecchio and Rice also falsely represented that investors were purchasing interests in wells that were already producing oil when, in fact, at no time during the sale of the Gray Hawk securities did the company have an interest in any producing wells. The Complaint alleges that Gray Hawk, Vecchio, and Rice violated the securities registration requirements of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, and the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and that Vecchio and Rice violated the broker-dealer registration requirements of Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Simultaneously with the filing of the Commission's Complaint, Gray Hawk, Vecchio, and Rice consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, to permanent injunctions enjoining them from future violations of the federal securities laws. The Commission waived payment of disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and did not assess civil penalties based upon Vecchio's and Rice's demonstrated inability to pay. ======END OF PAGE 1======