UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15402 / July 2, 1997 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. AFFORDABLE PREPAID CELLULAR, INC. AND JOHN C. ROCKETT, Civil Action No. 97-3750 RAP (JGx) (C.D. Cal.). The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on June 3, 1997, the Honorable Richard A. Paez, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, issued an order of preliminary injunction against Affordable Prepaid Cellular, Inc., and its part-owner and Vice President, John C. Rockett ("Rockett"). APC is based in Lake Forest, California, and its stated business is to provide prepaid cellular telephone service to "credit-challenged" individuals. The Court s Order also continued the freeze of APC s and Rockett s assets until trial, prohibits APC and Rockett from destroying documents, and requires APC and Rockett to account for investor funds. So far, neither APC nor Rockett has answered the Commission s complaint, and neither has complied with the Court ordered accountings. The Commission's complaint (filed May 20, 1997), and other papers filed in the case, allege that APC and Rockett fraudulently offered and/or sold units in APC, in the form of $5,000 corporate notes, to at least one hundred individuals since December 1996. According to APC, in return for their investment, APC promised investors a guaranteed 16 3/4% annual return, plus 1% of half of APC's profits, and that the investor's original contribution would be returned at the end of one year. Further, APC promised that investors' monies would be used to fund APC's business operations. Instead, however, the Commission alleges that Rockett misused and misappropriated substantial amounts of the $750,000 raised from investors by: Wire transferring at least $113,020 from APC s bank accounts to accounts in Tortola, British Virgin Islands; Withdrawing from APC s bank accounts at least $243,480, by writing checks up to $80,000 each to cash or to himself; and Paying commissions to sales agents of at least $57,750. In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the Commission had demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success in its action as to the fraudulent statements made by APC and Rockett, including that: (1) Rockett was Vice President and part-owner of APC; (2) Rockett has been twice convicted for selling fraudulent investments; (3) in 1992 an order was issued by the State of California against Rockett prohibiting him from selling securities in California; (4) eight other states have obtained orders against Rockett for violating state securities laws; and (5) contrary to APC's statements to investors that it is located in Seattle, Washington, APC is in fact located in Lake Forest, California. The Commission has alleged that these statements were materially misleading and omitted to state material facts, in violation of Section 17(a) of the ======END OF PAGE 1====== Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. ======END OF PAGE 2======