==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15249 / February 7, 1997 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 880 / February 7, 1997 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The AppleTree Companies, Inc., f/k/a Modami Services, Inc., Michael H. Salit, David B. Lobel, Paul B. Kravitz, and W. Scott Long III, No. 96-8675-CIV- RYSKAMP (S.D. Fla.) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on January 29, 1997, a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief was entered against The AppleTree Companies, Inc. by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The final judgment enjoins AppleTree from future violations of Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13, thereunder. The final judgment also requires AppleTree to provide an accounting of the proceeds from its 1992 registered offering of common stock. AppleTree consented to the entry of the permanent injunction and the accounting without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations. In its complaint, the Commission alleged that AppleTree, formerly headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, and known as Modami Services, Inc., violated the books and records provisions of the Exchange Act, and filed false and misleading annual and periodic reports with the Commission in 1992 and 1993. More particularly, the Commission alleged that AppleTree: ù falsely reported in 1992 and 1993 that it owned $440,000 in machinery and equipment which it did not in fact own; ù failed to disclose that two former officers and directors, Michael Salit and David Lobel, claimed to be creditors of AppleTree's chief supplier while AppleTree was doing business with that company; ù included in its 1992 annual report a false proposed joint venture agreement with a company called TSR, Inc. which purportedly had been signed by TSR's president when in fact AppleTree's former president, Paul Kravitz, had signed without authorization the name of TSR's president to the agreement; ù misrepresented in its 1993 annual report that TSR and AppleTree had "mutually agreed" not to pursue the joint venture due to "marketing concerns" when in fact TSR's president broke off negotiations with AppleTree upon ==========================================START OF PAGE 2====== discovering that Kravitz had signed his name to the proposed joint venture agreement without authorization. Based on the above, the Commission alleged that AppleTree failed to make and keep accurate books and records as required by Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act, and that it filed false and misleading annual and periodic reports with the Commission in violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13, thereunder. (On November 26, 1996, a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction was entered against Kravitz by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida with Kravitz' consent. Kravitz neither admitted nor denied the Commission's allegations.) (For further information, see LR-15102 and LR-15172; AAE Rel. 840 and AAE Rel. 860)