-------------------- BEGINNING OF PAGE #1 ------------------- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 14787 /January 18 , 1996 Securities and Exchange Commission v. PaineWebber Incorporated, United States District for the Southern District of New York, 96 Civ. 0331 (SHS) The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that the Honorable Sidney Stein of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York today entered a Final Order against PaineWebber Incorporated ("PaineWebber") pursuant to Section 21(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. PaineWebber consented to the Order without admitting or denying the allegations contained therein. The Final Order establishes a $40 million claims fund to be used to compensate purchasers of public, proprietary direct investments sold by PaineWebber from 1986 to 1992. The claims fund will be administered by an independent claims administrator, to be appointed by the Court in the next seven days. Pursuant to the Order, PaineWebber is required to pay $40 million into the claims fund and will also be responsible for the cost of administering the claims fund. On January 18, 1996, the SEC issued an administrative order charging PaineWebber with, among other things, violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws in the marketing and sale of limited partnership interests and other "direct investments" from 1986 to 1992. Simultaneously with the institution of the administrative proceeding, and without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, PaineWebber consented to the entry of a SEC Order. The SEC Order finds, among other things, that from 1986 to 1992, PaineWebber prepared and distributed sales and marketing materials for four families of direct investments -- PaineWebber/Geodyne oil and gas programs, PaineWebber Insured Mortgage Partners, PaineWebber/Independent Living Mortgage, and Pegasus Aircraft Partners -- that overstated the benefits and understated the risks of these investments, and characterized these direct investments as suitable for conservative investors without sufficiently disclosing the risk of loss of principal. In addition, PaineWebber sold direct investments to numerous investors for whom they were unsuitable and in concentrations too high given the investors' age, financial condition, sophistication and investment objectives. (see Securities Act of 1933 Release No. 7257) In addition to other remedial sanctions, the order imposes: 1. a censure; 2. a cease and desist order; 3. a civil penalty of $5 million; and 4. the obligation that PaineWebber comply with its representation that it has paid and its obligation to pay a total of $292.5 million to investors as follows: (a) Individual claims: By January 1997, PaineWebber will have paid an aggregate of $127.5 million to resolve individual investor claims relating to direct investments (PaineWebber has represented that it has already paid $120 million); -------------------- BEGINNING OF PAGE #2 ------------------- (b) Class Actions: PaineWebber has placed $125 million into a separate account to settle two class actions relating to direct investments (if PaineWebber is unable to settle the class actions, these monies revert to the claims fund); and (c) Claims Fund: The establishment of a $40 million claims fund, to be administered by a Claims Administrator appointed by the Court. PaineWebber will provide notice and a claims form to the last known address of each person known to have purchased one or more of the direct investments covered by the Final Order by April 17, 1996. The fund is not limited to purchasers of the four families listed above, and any investor who purchased one or more public, proprietary direct investments from PaineWebber between 1986 and 1992 may be eligible to seek compensation from the claims fund. To participate in the claims fund, an investor must submit a claims form within six months of the date of the mailing of the notice. The claims fund does not establish an exclusive remedy for investors with valid claims against PaineWebber, or others, relating to direct investments.