-------------------- BEGINNING OF PAGE #1 ------------------- U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 14672 / October 2, 1995 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHRISTOPHER M. PEDERSEN, Civil Action No. 95-6488 WJR(RNBx) (C.D. Cal.) The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that on September 28, 1995, it filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, seeking to permanently enjoin Christopher M. Pedersen ("Pedersen") from violations of the securities registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The Complaint also seeks an accounting, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and imposition of civil penalties against Pedersen. The Complaint alleges that from 1984 to August 1992, Pedersen, President of City USA Holding Corporation, City Oil Corporation, City Oil Management Corporation (collectively "City entities") and City First Securities Corp. d/b/a City Associates Investment Corporation ("City Associates"), formerly located in Los Angeles, California, raised approximately $10 million through the sale of securities, primarily in the form of oil and gas limited partnership interests, to several hundred investors in various states. The Complaint further alleges that Pedersen, directly and through City Associates, made material misrepresentations and omissions in connection with the offer and sale of these securities. Pedersen represented that bonds would be purchased to protect investments in some of the programs; however, bonds were not purchased for all of these offerings. In addition, offering materials for the various investment programs represented that funds raised would be used for those programs; instead, some investor funds were diverted to other investment programs, used for unrelated expenses and withdrawn by Pedersen as undisclosed salary "advances" and "officer loans." Finally, Pedersen represented in offering materials that City had sufficient assets to maintain all of its operations and demonstrate continual growth while omitting to disclose that the City entities were in serious financial decline from at least July 1991. The Complaint alleges that Pedersen violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.