Date: 03/21/2000 4:27 PM Subject: Proposed Regulation FD Dear Sirs: I am an individual investor writing to offer my wholehearted support for Proposed Regulation FD. I understand this regulation would combat the practice of selective disclosure of material information by requiring "fair disclosure" of such information. Specifically, I understand that this regulation would require that: (1) whenever an issuer intentionally discloses material information, it does so through public disclosure, not through selective disclosure; and (2) whenever an issuer learns that it has made a non-intentional material selective disclosure, the issuer make prompt public disclosure of that information. I am a scientist and an individual investor who spends a great deal of time and effort trading securities, through a deep discount brokerage, for my own account. I am not a "day-trader" who seeks to gain from tiny momentary fluctuations in stock prices. Instead, I study the fundamental characteristics of select companies in depth and try to assess the "intrinsic value" of such companies. Thus, although my focus has been on small-cap high-tech companies, my holding period has usually been in excess of one year. My only source of information is that which I obtain freely through public disclosure. Selective disclosure puts me at a significant disadvantage to mutual funds, financial institutions, banks, brokerages, and others who can afford the services of full-time analysts. While the American concept of democracy tolerates large disparities between "haves" and "have-nots" in terms of material assets, it has always espoused the notion of "equal opportunity" on a "level playing field". Selective disclosure creates an uneven playing field by enabling a privileged class to unfairly enrich themselves at the expense of other shareholders and investors. Consequently, the practice of selective disclosure is distinctly un-American. Sincerely, Rob Preuss