Date: 12/15/97 7:36 AM Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549 Regarding: File No. s7-25-97 Dear Mr. Katz: As an environmentalist and co-trustee of a sizeable estate, I am writing to oppose proposed changes in the rules governing shareholder resolutions. Such changes would impede the ability of shareholders to effect actions for the benefit of society and the environment. I am concerned that the blind pursuit of profit is becoming the only and heartless goal of corporate enterprise. It was not always so. My elderly mother is very proud of her stock holdings. We have had many disagreements over her selections, such as Exxon, which I know to be harming the environment. However, they have given her financial security, and, in her eyes, have provided a necessary service to the country. While I don't concur, it is important to her to believe that her stocks are providing a benefit and a service to society, whether it is fuel, telephone service, electricity, etc. She is most unhappy with the suggestion that corporations are currently pursuing the profit motive to the exclusion of any other benefit. The proposed changes would work to eliminate social and environmental consciousness from the agenda of big business, and therefore would be detrimental to society as a whole. The rules could define concern for the environment, for working people, for health and safety, or other vital concerns as "special interests", not worthy of attention, at the sole discretion of management. Far from harming a stock's performance, keeping up to date with vital concerns has been shown to be beneficial. Such informed and caring companies have fewer lawsuits brought against them, for one thing. In addition, the number of people is growing who wish to limit their investments to socially conscious companies I urge you to withdraw the proposed rule changes. Sincerely yours, Margaret N. Spallone 509 Wisconsin Drive Browns Mills, NJ 08015