Date: 9/17/98 10:09 AM September 16, 1998 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 450 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20549-6009 RE: File No. S7-16-98 Dear Mr. Katz: The Financial Reporting Committee (FRC) of the Institute of Management Accountants appreciates this opportunity to comment on the Commission?s proposed amendment to Rule 102(e) of the Commission?s Rules of Practice, albeit belatedly. The release of the proposed amendment and the close of the related comment period fell between the regular quarterly meetings of the FRC. However, the proposed rule is of such fundamental importance to our organization, the FRC respectfully requests its comments be accepted and considered by the Commission. The Institute of Management Accountants is the largest organization in this country devoted exclusively to management accounting and financial management professionals, with approximately 80,000 members. Our membership encompasses accountants drawn from every area of the accounting profession including business and industry, public accounting, academia, and government. The FRC supports the Commission?s general position that an accountant or other professional practicing before the Commission who intentionally and knowingly violates professional standards in a reckless way should be subject to disciplinary action by the Commission. However, the FRC strongly disagrees with the proposed rule in that application of the rule as presently written could construe errors of judgement or simple acts of negligence to be ?improper professional conduct? and therefore subject to punitive disciplinary action. The FRC also strongly disagrees with the proposed rule in that accountants have been unfairly singled out. These and other equally important issues have already been commented upon in the comment letters submitted by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and by the Financial Executives Institute. Rather than repeat similar comments here, the FRC would simply like to go on record as supporting the letters submitted by these two organizations. We would be happy to further discuss with you the views of our organization on this very important matter. Very truly yours, /s/ John J. Perrell III Chair