Author: "Roy Behren" Date: 11/18/98 5:09 PM Westchester Capital Management, Inc. 100 Summit Lake Drive, Valhalla, NY 10595 November 18, 1998 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549 Re: Securities Exchange Act Release No.39,844 (File No.S7-12-98) Dear Mr. Katz: We are writing to offer comments on the new Regulation ATS that was proposed by the SEC in April 1998. In particular, we wish to express our concerns with the proposal to require display of ATS institutional orders. We feel you should not adopt this rule. Westchester Capital Management and its affiliates manage approximately $600 million in assets for individuals, trusts, public funds and pension investors. In order to effectively manage our customers' funds, we have to be able to draw from a set of trade implementation strategies that allows us to obtain best execution in a variety of different situations. If we lose the ability to send upstairs orders to electronic brokers, we will lose one of our most useful and effective trading tools. The price swings that will result from large orders being publicly quoted will only compound the volatility that the new order-handling rules have produced. This will certainly cause situations where our trades will be more expensive under the new rules. Having access to multiple sources of liquidity without having to reveal our ultimate intent to the entire market increases our funds' performance and ultimately our investors' bottom lines. To avoid the market impact that a fully transparent quote would have on our orders, we may have to take trades to less transparent dealers or compromise executions by breaking up orders into smaller pieces. Whatever we are ultimately forced to do, our clients will suffer in the form of increased execution costs. For these reasons, we oppose the proposed institutional order display requirement and urge the SEC to reconsider adopting any such rule.