-1-


     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     17 CFR Parts 275 and 279

     (Release No. IA-1794; File No. S7-2-99)

     RIN 3235-AH60

     Transition Rule for Ohio Investment Advisers

     AGENCY:  Securities and Exchange Commission.

     ACTION:  Final rule.

     SUMMARY:  The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")

     is adopting a new rule and form amendments under the Investment

     Advisers Act of 1940 for investment advisers that will be subject

     to a new Ohio investment adviser statute.  The new rule provides

     a transition process for these investment advisers to switch from

     Commission to state registration.

     EFFECTIVE DATES:  Rule 203A-6 will become effective May 3, 1999.

     Amendments to Schedule I to Form ADV will become effective on

     December 31, 1999.

     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jeffrey O. Himstreet, Attorney,

     at (202) 942-0716, Task Force on Investment Adviser Regulation,

     Division of Investment Management, Securities and Exchange

     Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549-0506.

     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The Commission is adopting rule 203A-

     6 (17 CFR 275.203A-6) and technical amendments to Schedule I of

     Form ADV (17 CFR 279.1), both under the Investment Advisers Act

     of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b) ("Advisers Act" or "Act").

     I.   BACKGROUND

       Under the Advisers Act, as amended by the Investment Advisers

       Supervision Coordination Act ("Coordination Act"),<1> the

       Commission has regulatory responsibility for investment

       advisers that have at least $25 million of assets under

       management or advise a registered investment company.<2>

       The Commission also has regulatory responsibility for

       advisers that have their principal place of business in a

       state that has not enacted an investment adviser statute,

       regardless of their assets under management.<3>  At the time

       the Coordination Act was adopted, Ohio was one of four

       states that did not have an investment adviser statute.<4>

          Recently, Ohio enacted investment adviser legislation that

       will become effective on March 18, 1999.<5>

           On January 29, 1999, we issued a release proposing rule 203A-6

      ("Proposing Release") to assist the Ohio Division of

      Securities and to facilitate the transition of regulatory

      responsibilities for smaller Ohio advisers.<6>  We also

      proposed technical, corresponding changes to Schedule I to

      Form ADV.  We received two comment letters in response to

      the proposal, both of which supported the new rule and form

      amendments.<7>  The Commission is adopting rule 203A-6 and

      technical revisions to Schedule I to Form ADV as proposed.

     II.  DISCUSSION

          Under new rule 203A-6, new Ohio advisers (i.e., those

     advisers that are not currently registered with the Commission)

     that would not be eligible for Commission registration would

     register with the Ohio Division of Securities on or after the

     effective date of Ohio’s implementing rules.<8>  Smaller Ohio

     advisers (i.e. those that have less than $25 million in assets

     under management) that are currently registered with the

     Commission will switch over to registration with the Ohio

     Division of Securities between March 18,1999 and December 31,

     1999.<9>  These advisers may withdraw their Commission

     registration after they register with the Ohio Division of

     Securities, but not later than March 30, 2000.<10>

          With the enactment of the Ohio law, smaller Ohio advisers

     may no longer rely on the location of their principal office and

     place of business as a basis for Commission registration.  The

     Commission therefore is amending Schedule I by deleting the

     references to Ohio from both Schedule I and the Instructions to

     Schedule I.  The amendments to Schedule I will become effective

     on December 31, 1999.  As a result of the amendments to Schedule

     I, advisers will no longer be able to claim eligibility for

     Commission registration based on the location of their principal

     office and place of business in Ohio and must withdraw from

     Commission registration, unless otherwise eligible.

     III. COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS

         New rule 203A-6 and the technical amendments to Schedule I to Form ADV

     are designed to facilitate the transition of certain advisers

     from Commission to state registration.  This transition further

     implements congressional intent to reallocate regulatory

     responsibilities for investment advisers between the Commission

     and state securities authorities.

         New rule 203A-6 will not have a significant effect on the

     regulatory burden borne by investment advisers.  The Coordination

     Act imposes certain costs on advisers as a consequence of no

     longer being registered with the Commission, and, at the same

     time, confers benefits on these advisers, such as no longer

     requiring them to file amendments to Form ADV with the

     Commission.  The costs the Advisers Act imposes on advisers

     withdrawing from Commission registration is estimated to be $10

     per adviser (or, $5,400 in the aggregate).<11>   The new rule

     does not alter these burdens and benefits, but merely establishes

     a time by which advisers are required to switch their

     registration from the Commission to the Ohio Division of

     Securities.<12>  Therefore, the net costs imposed by the new rule

     and form amendments are negligible.  Smaller Ohio advisers may

     withdraw from Commission registration at any time and avoid any

     potential burdens associated with new rule 203A-6.

         In the Proposing Release, we requested comment on the

     cost/benefit analysis.  No comments on the cost/benefit analysis

     were provided.  The Commission believes that the costs imposed by

     the new rule are insignificant.

     IV. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT

        As discussed in the Proposing Release, the amendments to Schedule I to

     Form ADV contain a "collection of information" within the meaning

     of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 to 3520).

     The amendments to Schedule I to Form ADV are necessary to

     implement the Coordination Act with respect to advisers with

     their principal office in Ohio.  The Commission received no

     public comment in response to its request for comments on the

     Paperwork Reduction Act analysis.

        Under Office of Management and Budget rules, an agency may not

     conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

     collection of information unless the agency displays a valid OMB

     control number.<13>  Therefore, we have submitted the collection

     of information requirements to the Office of Management and

     Budget for review in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) and 5 CFR

     1320.11.  The title for the collection of information is

     "Schedule I to Form ADV," under the Advisers Act.  Schedule I to

     Form ADV contains a currently approved collection of information

     under OMB control number 3235-0490.  OMB has approved the PRA

     request in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), and has assigned

     control number 3235-0490 to Schedule I to Form ADV with an

     expiration date of March 31, 2002.

        The Commission is adopting amendments to Schedule I to Form

     ADV that will delete references to Ohio contained in Schedule I

     and the Instructions to Schedule I.  Each investment adviser must

     declare on Schedule I to Form ADV whether it is eligible for

     Commission registration.  The rules imposing this collection of

     information are found at 17 CFR 275.203-1 and 17 CFR 279.1.  Rule

     204-1 (17 CFR 275.204-1) requires an investment adviser

     registered with the Commission to file an amended Schedule I to

     From ADV annually within 90 days after the end of the investment

     adviser’s fiscal year.  The Commission is amending Schedule I

     only, and not Form ADV.

        There are no additional burdens associated with this filing

     that are not already imposed by the statutory requirement that

     advisers withdraw from Commission registration if no longer

     eligible for Commission registration.  The withdrawal procedures

     impose no additional paperwork burdens on advisers.  The new rule

     creates a March 30, 2000 deadline by which smaller Ohio advisers

     must withdraw from Commission registration.  Additionally,

     smaller Ohio advisers may withdraw from Commission registration

     at any time prior to March 30, 2000 and not be subject to the new

     rule.

        The Commission estimates that there are approximately 8,200

     investment advisers registered with the Commission.

     Approximately 899 investment advisers with their principal office

     in Ohio that are registered with the Commission would respond

     annually to the information requirements of Schedule I.  In

     addition, an estimated 760 new advisers will file Schedule I to

     Form ADV annually, approximately 83 of which are estimated to

     have their principal office in Ohio.  Of these 83 advisers, an

     estimated 72 will file Schedule I to Form ADV an average of once

     a year, and the remaining 11 that rely on the exemption provided

     by rule 203A-2(d) (17 CFR 275.203A-d) will file Schedule I to

     Form ADV an average of twice each year.  It is estimated that the

     Commission will receive approximately 993 total responses from

     investment advisers with their principal office in Ohio.

        The form amendments will affect only investment advisers with

     their principal office in Ohio, and will not materially alter the

     number of burden hours for those advisers.  It is estimated that

     the amendments to Schedule I to Form ADV imposes on Ohio

     investment advisers 852.75 total burden hours.  This estimate

     would likely remain constant absent the new rule and form

     amendments.  The collection of information required by Schedule I

     is mandatory, and responses are not kept confidential.  The form

     amendments, as adopted, do not impose a greater paperwork burden

     upon respondents than that estimated and described in the

     Proposing Release.

     V.   SUMMARY OF FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS

        The Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

     ("FRFA") in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act ("Reg.

     Flex. Act") (5 U.S.C. 604) in connection with the adoption of the

     rule described in this Release.  An Initial Regulatory

     Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") was prepared in accordance with 5

     U.S.C. 603 in conjunction with the Proposing Release and was made

     available to the public.  A summary of the IRFA was published in

     the Proposing Release.  We received no comments on the IRFA.

        The FRFA discusses both the need for, and objectives of, the

     rule and form amendments adopted by the Commission.  The new rule

     and form amendments, as adopted, create a transition process for

     smaller Ohio advisers.  The new rule (a) provides a one-year

     transition period for advisers to switch from Commission

     registration to state registration, and (b) requires smaller Ohio

     advisers to withdraw from Commission registration by March 30,

     2000.  The amendments to Schedule I delete references to Ohio to

     reflect that Ohio has recently enacted an investment adviser

     statute.

        The FRFA also provides a description and an estimate of the

     number of small entities to which the rule amendments will apply.

     For the purposes of the Advisers Act and the Reg. Flex. Act, an

     investment adviser, under Commission rules, generally is a small

     entity if (i) it has assets under management of less than $25

     million reported on its most recent Schedule I to Form ADV (17

     CFR 279.1); (ii) it does not have total assets of $5 million or

     more on the last day of the most recent fiscal year; and (iii) it

     is not in a control relationship with another investment adviser

     that is not a small entity.<14>

         It is estimated that approximately 1,000 Commission-

     registered advisers are small entities.  It is estimated that

     approximately 540 of these small-entity advisers have their

     principal office in Ohio.  Relatively few small entities thus

     will be affected by the new rule and form amendments.  As

     explained in the FRFA, the majority of these advisers are smaller

     Ohio advisers that will be required by the Coordination Act to

     withdraw from Commission registration and register with the

     various state securities authorities.  Absent Commission

     rulemaking, the Coordination Act requires smaller Ohio advisers

     to withdraw from Commission registration after the Ohio law is

     effective.  It takes, on average, one hour to complete form ADV-

     W.<15>  The costs associated with withdrawing from Commission

     registration would exist absent the new rule and form amendments.

     Therefore, the net costs imposed by the new rule and form

     amendments are negligible.

        The FRFA states that the rule amendments will impose no new

     reporting or recordkeeping requirements and will eliminate

     certain other requirements.  The new rule does, however, create a

     deadline for complying with an existing requirement.  Smaller

     Ohio advisers no longer eligible for Commission registration will

     be required to withdraw from Commission registration by March 30,

     2000.  These advisers will no longer be required to file an

     amended Schedule I with the Commission each year, or the other

     annual updates to Form ADV.

        The new rule and form amendments will not materially alter the

     time required for investment advisers to comply with these

     rules.<16>  The new rule and form amendments also are necessary

     to implement the Coordination Act with respect to smaller Ohio

     advisers.  The FRFA states that the burden to investment advisers

     subject to the rule should be outweighed by the benefits to the

     investment advisers subject to the new rule and form amendments.

     There are no rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with, the

     new rule and form amendments.

        Finally, the FRFA states that, in adopting the new rule and

     form amendments, we considered (a) the establishment of differing

     compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into

     account resources available to small entities; (b) the

     clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and

     reporting requirements under the new rule for small entities; (c)

     the use of performance rather than design standards; and (d) an

     exemption from coverage of the new rule, or any part of the new

     rule, for small entities.  The FRFA explains that the Commission

     concluded that establishing different standards for small

     entities is unnecessary and inappropriate.

        The FRFA is available for public inspection in File No. S7-2-

     99, and a copy may be obtained by contacting Jeffrey O.

     Himstreet, Attorney, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 5th

     Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549-0506.

     VI.   STATUTORY AUTHORITY

        The Commission is adopting new rule 203A-6 pursuant to the authority set

     forth in section 203(h) (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(h)); section 203A(c) (15

     U.S.C. 80b-3a(c)); and section 211(a) (15 U.S.C. 80b-11(a)) of

     the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

        The Commission is adopting amendments to Form ADV pursuant to

     the authority set forth in section 203(c)(1) (15 U.S.C. 80b-

     3(c)(1)); and section 204 (15 U.S.C. 80b-4) of the Investment

     Advisers Act of 1940.

     List of Subjects in 17 CFR Parts 275 and 279

        Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

     TEXT OF RULE AND FORM AMENDMENTS

        For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 17, Chapter II

     of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

     Part 275 -- Rules and Regulations, Investment Advisers Act of

     1940

        1.   The authority citation for Part 275 continues to read in

     part as follows:

        Authority:  15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(17), 80b-3, 80b-4, 80b-6(4),

     80b-6a, 80b-11, unless otherwise noted.

        2.   Section 275.203A-6 is added to read as follows:

     § 275.203A-6   Transition Period for Ohio Investment Advisers.

          (a)    Ohio Authority.  Notwithstanding section 203A(b) of

     the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(b)), the Ohio Revised Code, sections

     1707.01 to 1707.99, is effective with respect to an investment

     adviser registered with the Commission that, but for having its

     principal office and place of business in Ohio, would be

     prohibited from registering with the Commission under section

     203A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3a).

        (b)   Withdrawal Required.  Every investment adviser that is

     registered with the Commission solely because its principal

     office and place of business is located in Ohio must withdraw

     from Commission registration by March 30, 2000.

     PART 279 - FORMS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF

     1940

        3.   The authority citation for Part 279 continues to read as follows:

        Authority:  The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.

     80b-1, et seq.

        4.   By  revising Schedule I to Form ADV (referenced in §

     279.1) to remove all references to "Ohio" and by amending the

     Instructions to Schedule I to Form ADV (referenced in § 279.1) to

     remove all references to "Ohio".

         Note:  The text of Schedule I to Form ADV (§ 279.1) does not

     and the amendments will not appear in the Code of Federal

     Regulations.



     By the Commission.



                    Jonathan G. Katz
                    Secretary


     Dated:  March 25, 1999


















     **ENDNOTES**


      <1>:    Title III of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of
           1996, Pub. L. No. 104-290, 110 Stat. 3416 (1996) (codified in
           scattered sections of the United States Code).


      <2>:    15 U.S.C. 80b-3A(a).


      <3>:    See Rules Implementing Amendments to the Investment Advisers
           Act of 1940, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 1633 (May 15,
           1997) (62 FR 28112 (May 22, 1997)) at II.E.1.


      <4>:    Colorado, Iowa and Wyoming also did not have investment adviser
           statutes at the time Congress enacted the Coordination Act.  Since
           that time, Colorado and Iowa have enacted investment adviser
           legislation, and we recently amended Schedule I to Form ADV to
           reflect these developments.  Technical Changes to Schedule I to
           Form ADV, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 1733A (Jan. 7, 1999)
           (64 FR 2120 (Jan. 13, 1999)).


      <5>:     H.B. 695, 122d Gen. Ass., Reg. Sess. (Ohio 1997-1998).


      <6>:    Transition Rule for Ohio Investment Advisers, Investment
           Advisers Act Release No. 1787 (Jan. 29, 1999) (64 FR 5722 (Feb. 5,
           1999)).


      <7>:    Letter from Thomas Geyer, Commissioner, Ohio Securities
           Division to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, SEC (Feb. 17, 1999), File
           No. S7-2-99; Letter from Peter C. Hildreth, President, North
           American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. to Jonathan
           G. Katz, Secretary, SEC (Mar. 8, 1999), File No. S7-2-99.


      <8>:    The Ohio Division of Securities estimates that its implementing
           rules would be effective by March 24, 1999.


      <9>:    Ohio Legislation, supra note  (to be codified at section
           1707.161(E) of the Ohio Revised Code).  In addition, advisers
           ineligible for Commission registration may be required to register
           with other state securities authorities, subject to the Advisers
           Act.  The Coordination Act amended the Advisers Act to add section
           222(d) (15 U.S.C. 80b-22(d)), which makes state investment adviser
           statutes inapplicable to advisers that do not have a place of
           business in the state and have fewer than six clients who are
           residents of that state.


      <10>:    New rule 203A-6(b).  We recognize that Ohio investment
           advisers may be registered with, and regulated by, both the Ohio
           Division of Securities and the Commission until the advisers
           withdraw from Commission registration.  During this time, Ohio
           investment advisers may be subject to both federal and state
           regulatory requirements.  Ohio investment advisers no longer
           eligible for Commission registration may avoid this "duplicate
           regulation" by withdrawing from Commission registration at any
           time after they have registered with the State of Ohio.

      <11>:    The Office of Management and Budget has approved a collection
           of information for Form ADV-W (OMB Control No. 3235-0313).  The
           estimated average burden is 1.0 hours, per response.  Based on an
           average salary of $10 per hour, including benefits, the total
           costs imposed by the Advisers Act on Ohio advisers required to
           withdraw from Commission registration is approximately $5,400.


      <12>:    Under current rules, advisers that are no longer eligible for
           Commission registration under section 203A(a) of the Act (15
           U.S.C. 80b-3a(a)) must withdraw from registration within 90 days
           after the date the adviser is required by rule 204-1(a) (17 CFR
           275.204-1(a)).  See 17 CFR 279.1 (Schedule I, instruction 6).


      <13>:    44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(1)(B)(v).


      <14>:   Rule 0-7 (17 CFR 275.0-7).

      <15>:    The Office of Management and Budget has approved a collection
           of information for Form ADV-W (OMB Control No. 3235-0313).  The
           estimated average burden is 1.0 hours, per response.  Based on an
           average salary of $10 per hour, including benefits, the total
           costs imposed by the Advisers Act on Ohio advisers required to
           withdraw from Commission registration is approximately $5,400.


      <16>:     Currently, investment advisers that are required to withdraw
           from Commission registration because they are no longer eligible
           under section 203A(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(a)) are
           required to withdraw from registration within 90 days after the
           date the adviser’s Schedule I was required by rule 204-1(a) (17
           CFR 275.204-1(a)) to have been filed with the Commission.  See
           Schedule I, instruction 6 (17 CFR 279.1).