==========================================START OF PAGE 1======

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 240

Release No. 34-36940, International Series Release No. 948, File
No. S7-34-95

RIN 3235-AG68

Exemption of the Securities of the Federative Republic of Brazil,
the Republic of Argentina, and the Republic of Venezuela Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for Purposes of Trading
Futures Contracts on those Securities

AGENCY:   Securities and Exchange Commission

ACTION:   Final Rule

SUMMARY:  The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or

"Commission") is adopting an amendment to Rule 3a12-8 under the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that would designate debt

obligations issued by the Federative Republic of Brazil

("Brazil"), the Republic of Argentina ("Argentina"), and the

Republic of Venezuela ("Venezuela") (collectively the "Additional

Countries") as "exempted securities" for the purpose of marketing

and trading futures contracts on those securities in the United

States.  The purpose of this amendment is solely to permit

futures on the sovereign debt of the Additional Countries to be

traded in the United States.  This change is not intended to have

any substantive effect on the operation of the Rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE:     [Insert date of publication in the Federal

Register]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   James T. McHale, Attorney,

Office of Market Supervision ("OMS"), Division of Market

Regulation ("Division"), Securities and Exchange Commission (Mail
==========================================START OF PAGE 2======

Stop 5-1), 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at

202/942-0190.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.   Introduction

     Under the Commodity Exchange Act ("CEA"), it is unlawful to

trade a futures contract on any individual security, unless the

security in question is an exempted security (other than a

municipal security) for the purposes of the Securities Act of

1933 ("Securities Act") or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

("Exchange Act").-[1]-  Debt obligations of foreign

governments are not exempted securities under either of these

statutes.  The Commission, however, has adopted Rule 3a12-8 under

the Exchange Act ("Rule")-[2]- to designate debt obligations

issued by certain foreign governments as exempted securities

under the Exchange Act solely for the purpose of marketing and

trading futures contracts on those securities in the United

States.  The foreign governments currently designated in the Rule

are Great Britain, Canada, Japan, Australia, France, New Zealand,

Austria, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany,

the Republic of Ireland, Italy, the Kingdom of Spain, and Mexico

(the "Designated Foreign Governments").  As a result of being

included in the Rule, futures contracts on the debt obligations


---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[1]-     The term "exempted security" is defined in Section
               3 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C.  77c, and
               Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 
               78c(a)(12).

     -[2]-     17 CFR 240.3a12-8
==========================================START OF PAGE 3======

of these countries may be sold in the United States, as long as

the other terms of the Rule are satisfied.

     On December 13, 1995, the Commission issued a release

proposing to amend Rule 3a12-8 to designate the debt obligations

of the Additional Countries as exempted securities, solely for

the purpose of futures trading.-[3]-  No comment letters

were received in response to the proposal. 

     The Commission is adopting this amendment to the Rule,

adding Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela to the list of countries

whose debt obligations are exempted by Rule 3a12-8.  In order to

qualify for the exemption, futures contracts on debt obligations

of the Additional Countries would have to meet all the other

requirements of the Rule.

II.  Background

     Rule 3a12-8 was adopted in 1984-[4]- pursuant to the

exemptive authority in Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act in

order to provide a limited exception to the CEA's prohibition on

the trading of futures overlying individual securities.-[5]- 

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[3]-     See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36580
               ("Proposing Release") (December 13, 1995), 60 FR
               65607 (December 20, 1995).

     -[4]-     See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 20708
               ("Original Adopting Release") (March 2, 1984), 49
               FR 8595 (March 8, 1984) and 19811 ("Original
               Proposing Release") (May 25, 1983), 48 FR 24725
               (June 2, 1983).

     -[5]-     In enacting the Futures Trading Act of 1982,
               Congress expressed its understanding that neither
               the SEC nor the Commodity Futures Trading
               Commission ("CFTC") had intended to bar the sale
                                                   (continued...)
==========================================START OF PAGE 4======

As originally adopted, the Rule provided that debt obligations of

the United Kingdom and Canada would be deemed to be exempted

securities, solely for the purpose of permitting the offer, sale,

and confirmation of "qualifying foreign futures contracts" on

such securities, so long as the securities in question were

neither registered under the Securities Act nor the subject of

any American depositary receipt so registered.  A futures

contract on such a debt obligation is deemed under the Rule to be

a "qualifying foreign futures contract" if delivery under the

contract is settled outside the United States and is traded on a

board of trade.-[6]-

     The conditions imposed by the Rule were intended to

facilitate the trading of futures contracts on foreign government

securities in the United States while requiring offerings of

foreign government securities to comply with the federal

securities laws.  Accordingly, the conditions set forth in the


---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[5]-(...continued)
               of futures contracts on debt obligations of the
               United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
               Ireland ("United Kingdom") to U.S. persons, and
               its expectation that administrative action would
               be taken to allow the sale of such futures
               contracts in the United States.  See Original
               Proposing Release, supra note 4, 48 FR at 24725
               [citing 128 Cong. Rec. H7492 (daily ed. September
               23, 1982) (statements of Representatives Daschle
               and Wirth)].

     -[6]-     As originally adopted, the Rule required that the
               board of trade be located in the country that
               issued the underlying securities.  This
               requirement was eliminated in 1987.  See
               Securities Exchange Act Release No. 24209 (March
               12, 1987), 52 FR 8875 (March 20, 1987).
==========================================START OF PAGE 5======

Rule were designed to ensure that markets for futures on these

instruments would not be used to avoid the securities law

registration requirements.

     Subsequently, the Commission amended the Rule to include the

debt securities issued by Japan, Australia, France, New Zealand,

Austria, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany,

Ireland, Italy, Spain, and, most recently, Mexico.-[7]-

     The Chicago Mercantile Exchange ("CME") has informed the

Commission that U.S. citizens may be interested in futures

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[7]-     As originally adopted, the Rule applied only to
               British and Canadian government debt securities. 
               See Original Adopting Release, supra note 4.  In
               1986, the Rule was amended to include Japanese
               government debt securities.  See Securities
               Exchange Act Release No. 23423 (July 11, 1986), 51
               FR 25996 (July 18, 1986).  In 1987, the Rule was
               amended to include debt securities issued by
               Australia, France and New Zealand.  See Securities
               Exchange Act Release No. 25072 (October 29, 1987),
               52 FR 42277 (November 4, 1987).  In 1988, the Rule
               was amended to include debt securities issued by
               Austria, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands,
               Switzerland, and West Germany.  See Securities
               Exchange Act Release No. 26217 (October 26, 1988),
               53 FR 43860 (October 31, 1988).  In 1992 the Rule
               was again amended to (1) include debt securities
               offered by the Republic of Ireland and Italy, (2)
               change the country designation of "West Germany"
               to the "Federal Republic of Germany," and (3)
               replace all references to the informal names of
               the countries listed in the Rule with references
               to their official names.  See Securities Exchange
               Act Release No. 30166 (January 6, 1992), 57 FR
               1375 (January 14, 1992).  In 1994, the Rule was
               amended to include debt securities issued by the
               Kingdom of Spain.  See Securities Exchange Act
               Release No. 34908 (October 27, 1994), 59 FR 54812
               (November 2, 1994).  Finally, in 1995 the Rule was
               amended to include Mexican sovereign debt.  See
               Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36530
               (November 30, 1995) 60 FR 62323 (December 6, 1995)
               ("Mexico Adopting Release").
==========================================START OF PAGE 6======

products based on the debt obligations of the Additional

Countries, and has requested that Rule 3a12-8 be amended to

facilitate such trading.-[8]-  The CME has represented that

it intends to develop a futures contract market in Brady bonds

issued by the Additional Countries.-[9]-  Brady bonds are

issued pursuant to the Brady plan, which allows developing

countries to restructure their commercial bank debt by issuing

long-term dollar denominated bonds.-[10]-  The Commission

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[8]-     See Letter from William J. Brodsky, President and
               Chief Executive Officer, CME, to Arthur Levitt,
               Jr., Chairman, Commission, dated November 10, 1995
               ("CME Petition").  The Commission subsequently
               received a request from the New York Cotton
               Exchange ("NYCE") to amend the Rule to include the
               same Additional Countries.  See Letter from Philip
               McBride Johnson, Esq., Skadden, Arps, Slate,
               Meagher & Flom, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
               Commission, dated November 30, 1995.

     -[9]-     The marketing and trading of foreign futures
               contracts is subject to regulation by the CFTC. 
               In particular, Section 4b of the CEA authorizes
               the CFTC to regulate the offer and sale of foreign
               futures contracts to U.S. residents, and Rule 9
               (17 CFR 30.9), promulgated under Section
               2(a)(1)(A) of the CEA, is intended to prohibit
               fraud in connection with the offer and sale to
               U.S. persons of futures contracts executed on
               foreign exchanges.  Additional rules promulgated
               under 2(a)(1)(A) of the CEA govern the domestic
               offer and sale of futures and options contracts
               traded on foreign boards of trade.  These rules
               require, among other things, that the domestic
               offer and sale of foreign futures be effected
               through the CFTC registrants or through entities
               subject to a foreign regulatory framework
               comparable to that governing domestic futures
               trading.  See 17 CFR 30.3, 30.4, and 30.5 (1991).

     -[10]-    There are several types of Brady bonds, but "Par
               Bradys" and "Discount Bradys" represent the great
               majority of issues in the Brady bond market.  In
                                                   (continued...)
==========================================START OF PAGE 7======

understands that Brady bonds issued by the Additional Countries

are currently traded primarily in the over-the-counter market in

the United States.

     The Commission is amending Rule 3a12-8 to add Brazil,

Argentina, and Venezuela to the list of countries whose debt

obligations are deemed to be "exempted securities" under the

terms of the Rule.  Under this amendment, the existing conditions

set forth in the Rule (i.e., that the underlying securities not

be registered in the United States,-[11]- that the futures

contracts require delivery outside the United States,-[12]-



---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[10]-(...continued)
               general, both Par Bradys and Discount Bradys are
               secured as to principal at maturity by U.S.
               Treasury zero-coupon bonds.  Additionally, usually
               12 to 18 months of interest payments are also
               secured in the form of a cash collateral account,
               which is maintained to pay interest in the event
               that the sovereign debtor misses an interest
               payment. 

     -[11]-    The Commission notes that while no Brady bonds
               issued by the Additional Countries are currently
               registered in the United States, certain sovereign
               debt issues of Argentina and Venezuela have been
               so registered.  Futures on U.S.-registered debt
               securities of Argentina and Venezuela (or any
               sovereign debt which in the future becomes so
               registered) would not be deemed exempt securities
               under Rule 3a12-8.

     -[12]-    The CME's proposed futures contracts will be cash-
               settled (i.e., settlement of the futures contracts
               will not entail delivery of the underlying
               securities).  The Commission has recognized that a
               cash-settled futures contract is consistent with
               the requirement of the Rule that delivery must be
               made outside the United States.  See Securities
               Exchange Act Release No. 25072 (October 29, 1987),
               52 FR 42277 (November 4, 1987).
==========================================START OF PAGE 8======

and that the contracts be traded on a board of trade) would

continue to apply.  III. Discussion

     For the reasons discussed below, the Commission finds that

it is consistent with the public interest and the protection of

investors that Rule 3a12-8 be amended to include the sovereign

debt obligations of the Additional Countries.  The Commission

believes that the trading of futures contracts on the sovereign

debt of the Additional Countries could provide U.S. investors and

dealers with a vehicle for hedging the risks involved in holding

debt instruments of the Additional Countries and that the

sovereign debt of the Additional Countries should be subject to

the same regulatory treatment under the Rule as that of the

Designated Foreign Governments.  

     In determining whether to amend the Rule to add proposed

countries, the Commission has considered whether there is an

active and liquid secondary trading market in the particular

sovereign debt.  In this regard, the amount of outstanding

sovereign debt of Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela is large and

secondary trading appears to be active and liquid.  According to

the CME, as of December 31, 1993, the total public and publicly

guaranteed debt-[13]- of Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela

was approximately US$86 billion, US$55 billion, and US$74

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[13]-    Public debt is an external obligation of a public
               debtor, including the national government, a
               political subdivision (or any agency of either)
               and autonomous public bodies.  Publicly guaranteed
               debt is an external obligation of a private debtor
               that is guaranteed for repayment by a public
               entity.
==========================================START OF PAGE 9======

billion, respectively.-[14]-  Moreover, the cash market for

Brady bonds issued by the Additional Countries evidences

relatively active trading.  Based on data provided by the CME,

the total 1994 trading volume in the Brady bonds of Brazil,

Argentina, and Venezuela was approximately US$371 billion, US$360

billion, and US$320 billion, respectively.-[15]-  As is the

case for all sovereign issuers, there are less actively traded

sovereign debt instruments issued by the Additional Countries,

but the Commission believes that as a whole the sovereign debt

market for the Additional Countries is sufficiently liquid and

deep for purposes of Rule 3a12-8.  Accordingly, the Commission

believes that it is appropriate to exempt the sovereign debt of

Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela because of the overall depth and

liquidity of the existing cash market in the Additional Countries

sovereign debt.

     The Commission also believes that the amendment offers

potential benefits for U.S. investors.  As stated above, the

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[14]-    See Letter from Carl A. Royal, Senior Vice
               President and Special Counsel, CME, to James T.
               McHale, Attorney, OMS, Division, Commission, dated
               November 30, 1995 (citing the World Bank's 1995
               World Debt Tables as the source for this
               information) ("November 30 letter").  As mentioned
               earlier, the Commission recently amended the Rule
               to include the debt securities of Mexico.  As of
               March 31, 1995 there was approximately US$87.5
               billion face amount Mexican government debt issued
               and outstanding of various classes and maturities. 
               See Mexico Adopting Release, supra note 7.

     -[15]-    See November 30 letter, supra note 14.  The total
               1994 dollar-based trading volume in Mexican Brady
               bonds was approximately US$282.3 billion.  See
               Mexico Adopting Release, supra note 7.
==========================================START OF PAGE 10======

amendment will allow U.S. boards of trade to offer in the United

States, and U.S. investors to trade, a greater range of futures

contracts on foreign government debt obligations.  Specifically,

the trading of futures on the sovereign debt of Brazil,

Argentina, and Venezuela should provide U.S. investors with a

vehicle for hedging the risks involved in holding positions in

the underlying sovereign debt of the Additional Countries.  The

Commission does not anticipate that the amendment will result in

any direct cost for U.S. investors or others.  The amendment will

impose no recordkeeping or compliance burdens, and merely would

provide a limited purpose exemption under the federal securities

laws.  The restrictions imposed under the amendment are identical

to the restrictions currently imposed under the terms of the Rule

and are designed to protect U.S. investors.

     In the Proposing Release the Commission solicited comment on

the general application and operation of the Rule given the

increased globalization of the securities markets since the Rule

was adopted.  The Commission intends to consider this issue

further, but does not believe it should delay the inclusion of

the Additional Countries in the list of countries whose debt

obligations are exempted under Rule 3a12-8.  Nevertheless, the

Commission continues to welcome suggestions on potential

restructuring of Rule 3a12-8 to adapt to the ever-increasing

internationalization of the securities markets.

IV.  Regulatory Flexibility Act Consideration
==========================================START OF PAGE 11======

     Chairman Levitt has certified in connection with the

Proposing Release that this amendment, if adopted, would not have

a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities.  The Commission received no comments on this

certification.
==========================================START OF PAGE 12======

V.   Effects on Competition and Other Findings

     Section 23(a)(2) of the Exchange Act-[16]- requires

the Commission, in adopting rules under the Exchange Act, to

consider the competitive effects of such rules, if any, and to

balance any impact with the regulatory benefits gained in terms

of furthering the purposes of the Exchange Act.  The Commission

has considered the amendment to the Rule in light of the

standards cited in Section 23(a)(2) and believes that adoption of

the amendment will not impose any burden on competition not

necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the

Exchange Act.  As stated above, the amendment is designed to

assure the lawful availability in this country of futures

contracts on the government debt of the Additional Countries that

otherwise would not be permitted to be marketed under the terms

of the CEA.  The amendment thus serves to expand the range of

financial products available in the United States and enhances

competition in financial markets.  Insofar as the Rule contains

limitations, they are designed to promote the purposes of the

Exchange Act by ensuring that futures trading on government

securities of the Additional Countries is consistent with the

goals and purposes of the federal securities laws by minimizing

the impact of the Rule on securities trading and distribution in

the United States.

     Because the amendment to the Rule is exemptive in nature,

the Commission has determined to make the foregoing action

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[16]-    15 U.S.C.  78w(a)(2).
==========================================START OF PAGE 13======

effective immediately upon publication in the Federal

Register.-[17]-

VI.  Statutory Basis

     The amendment to Rule 3a12-8 is being adopted pursuant to 15

U.S.C.  78a et seq., particularly Sections 3(a)(12) and 23(a),

15 U.S.C.  78c(a)(12) and 78w(a).  

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 240 

     Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

     Text of the Adopted Amendment

     For the reasons set forth above, the Commission is amending

Part 240 of Chapter II, Title 17 of the Code of Federal

Regulations as follows:

Part 240 - GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

          OF 1934

     1.   The authority citation for Part 240 continues to read

in part as follows:

     Authority:  15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77eee, 77ggg,

77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78d, 78i, 78j, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78p,

78q, 78s, 78w, 78x, 78ll(d), 79q, 79t, 80a-20, 80a-23, 80a-29,

80a-37, 80b-3, 80b-4 and 80b-11, unless otherwise noted.

               *         *         *         *         *

     2.   Section 240.3a12-8 is amended by removing the word "or"

at the end of paragraph (a)(1)(xv), removing the "period" at the

end of paragraph (a)(1)(xvi) and adding ";" in its place, and



---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[17]-    15 U.S.C.  553(d).
==========================================START OF PAGE 14======

adding paragraph (a)(1)(xvii), paragraph (a)(1)(xviii), and

paragraph (a)(1)(xix) to read as follows:

240.3a12-8   Exemption for designated foreign government
               securities for purposes of futures trading.

     (a)       * * *

     (1)       * * *

     (xvii)    the Federative Republic of Brazil;

     (xviii)   the Republic of Argentina; or

     (xix)     the Republic of Venezuela.

               *         *         *         *         *

By the Commission.

                                   Jonathan G. Katz
                                   Secretary

Dated:    March 7, 1996