SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     17 CFR Part 201

     [Release No. 34-40636; File No. S7-23-98]

     Rules of Practice

     AGENCY:   Securities and Exchange Commission.

     ACTION:   Final rules.

     SUMMARY:  The Securities and Exchange Commission is adopting amendments to

     its Rules of Practice, Rules 210 and 221.  The Commission is amending Rule

     210 to permit, for representatives of any federal, state, or local criminal

     prosecutorial authority, limited participation for the purpose of

     requesting a stay in an enforcement or disciplinary proceeding, in order to

     support efforts to bring criminal prosecutions arising out of securities

     violations.  The Commission is amending Rule 221 to require only one

     prehearing conference, instead of two, as previously required, in order to

     streamline the administrative process and conserve the parties' and the

     Commission's resources.

     EFFECTIVE DATE:  [insert date 30 days after publication].

     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan L. Loizeaux, Principal Assistant

     General Counsel, or Kathleen O'Mara, Senior Counsel, Office of General

     Counsel, (202) 942-0950, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth

     Street, N.W., Stop 6-6, Washington, D.C. 20549.

     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

     I. DISCUSSION

          The Commission adopted, after notice and comment, comprehensive

     revisions to its Rules of Practice that became effective on July 24, 1995.







     <(1)>  These revisions were the result of an approximately two-and-a-

     half year study by the Commission's Task Force on Administrative

     Proceedings that culminated in a comprehensive report. <(2)>  The Task

     Force found that the fundamental structure of the Commission's

     administrative process was sound and successfully protected the essential

     interests of respondents, investors, and the public, but that some changes

     were necessary.  The Task Force recommended changes to the Rules of

     Practice in an effort to set forth applicable procedural requirements more

     completely, in a format easier to use, and to streamline procedures that

     had become burdensome. 

          In November 1997, the Commission's Inspector General issued a report

     evaluating the Commission's Administrative Proceedings Process in an

     attempt to assess the impact of the new Rules of Practice.  The Inspector

     General recommended, among other things, that the Commission review Rules

     210 and 221.  The Commission reviewed these rules and proposed that the

     rules be changed as discussed below (and reflected in the text of the

     rules).  The proposed rules were published for notice and comment on

     September 2, 1998 in the Federal Register. <(3)>  No comments were

     received.

     The Commission is adopting these rules as proposed.

                              

          <(1)>     Final Rules of Practice, Exchange Act Release No.
                    35833, 60 FR 32738 (June 23, 1995).

          <(2)>     Task Force on Administrative Proceedings, Securities
                    and Exchange Commission, Fair and Efficient
                    Administrative Proceedings: Report of the Task Force
                    (February 1993).

          <(3)>     Rules of Practice -- Rules 210 and 221, Exchange Act
                    Release No. 40364 (August 26, 1998), 63 FR 46716.

                              ======END OF PAGE 2======







          Rule 210 previously prohibited intervention or limited participation

     in Commission enforcement proceedings and in disciplinary proceedings to

     review self-regulatory organization determinations. <(4)>  Prohibiting

     intervention or participation in these cases served the purpose of

     preventing extraneous issues from diverting administrative proceedings

     before the Commission and promoted timely and efficient resolution of all

     matters before the Commission.

          In recent years, however, the Commission has received requests from

     representatives of various federal and local criminal prosecutors to

     participate in enforcement proceedings in order to request a stay of the

     Commission's proceedings during the pendency of a criminal investigation or

     prosecution based on the same or related underlying conduct.  These

     authorities typically assert that substantial prejudice could result to a

     criminal prosecution if an administrative proceeding is not postponed.

          The Commission supports efforts to bring criminal prosecutions arising

     out of securities violations.  Accordingly, the Commission is adopting

     amendments to Rule 210 to allow authorized representatives of the United

     States Department of Justice, including any United States Attorney's

     Office, and of state and local prosecutors to seek leave to participate in

     a Commission enforcement or disciplinary proceeding for the limited purpose

     of requesting a stay in that proceeding.  We have determined that the

     process of considering such requests for postponements will be facilitated

     if those seeking them are permitted to present their views to the hearing
                              

          <(4)>     Rule 210(f), however, allowed the Commission or a
                    hearing officer to modify the provisions of Rule 210 to
                    impose such terms and conditions on participation of
                    any person in any proceeding as it may deem necessary
                    or appropriate in the public interest. 

                              ======END OF PAGE 3======







     officer.  The hearing officer can then evaluate that request in light of

     the hearing's status.  Any postponement of an enforcement or disciplinary

     proceeding, however, should be based on a showing of good cause and be

     limited to a reasonable period of time, balancing the need for delay

     against the need to bring the proceeding to a timely resolution, consistent

     with the public interest. 

          The Commission is also adopting amendments to Rule 221 to require a

     single prehearing conference, instead of the two prehearing conferences

     previously required.  The Commission's experience with this Rule has

     indicated that, as a routine practice, two conferences are not always

     necessary.  Therefore, in order to streamline the administrative process,

     conserving the parties', as well as the Commission's, resources, the

     Commission is amending the rule to require only one prehearing conference. 

     Rule 221 would continue to permit the hearing officer in his or her

     discretion to order additional prehearing conferences on his or her own

     motion or at the request of a party.

     II. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT  

          The Commission finds, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure

     Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), that this revision relates solely to agency

     organization, procedures, or practice.  It is therefore not subject to the

     provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act requiring notice,

     opportunity for public comment, and publication.  The Regulatory

     Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., also does not apply.  Nonetheless,

     the Commission previously published these rule changes for notice and

     comment.

     III. STATUTORY BASIS AND TEXT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT


                              ======END OF PAGE 4======







          The proposed Rule amendments would be promulgated pursuant to section

     19 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. 77s; section 23 of the Exchange Act, 15

     U.S.C. 78w; section 20 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act, 15 U.S.C.

     79t; section 319 of the Trust Indenture Act, 15 U.S.C. 77sss; sections 38

     and 40 of the Investment Company Act, 15 U.S.C. 80a-37 and 80a-39; and

     section 211 of the Investment Advisers Act, 15 U.S.C. 80b-11.   

     List of Subjects

     17 CFR Part 201

          Administrative practice and procedure.

          For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Title 17, Chapter II of the

     Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

     PART 201 - Subpart D - Rules of Practice

          1.   The authority citation for Part 201, Subpart D, continues to read

     as follows:

          AUTHORITY: 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77h-1, 77j, 77s, 77u, 78c(b), 78d-

     1, 78d-2, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o(d), 78o-3, 78s, 78u-2, 78u-3, 78v, 78w, 79c,

     79s, 79t, 79z-5a, 77sss, 77ttt, 80a-8,

     80a-9, 80a-37, 80a-38, 80a-39, 80a-40, 80a-41, 80a-44, 80b-3,

     80b-9, 80b-11, and 80b-12 unless otherwise noted.

          2.   Section 201.210 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) and the

     introductory text of paragraph (c) and adding paragraph (c)(3) to read as

     follows:

       201.210 Parties, limited participants and amici curiae.

          (a) Parties in an enforcement or disciplinary proceeding or a

     proceeding to review a self-regulatory organization determinationÄÄ(1)

     Generally. No person shall be granted leave to become a party or non-party


                              ======END OF PAGE 5======







     participant on a limited basis in an enforcement or disciplinary proceeding

     or a proceeding to review a determination by a self-regulatory organization

     pursuant to 201.420 and 201.421, except as authorized by paragraph (c) of

     this section.

                                      * * * * *

          (c) Leave to participate on a limited basis. In any proceeding, other

     than an enforcement proceeding, a disciplinary proceeding or a proceeding

     to review a self-regulatory organization determination, any person may seek

     leave to participate on a limited basis as a non-party participant as to

     any matter affecting the person's interests.  In any enforcement proceeding

     or disciplinary proceeding, an authorized representative of the United

     States Department of Justice, an authorized representative of a United

     States Attorney, or an authorized representative of any criminal

     prosecutorial authority of any State or any other political subdivision of

     a State may seek leave to participate on a limited basis as a non-party

     participant as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.

                                      * * * * *

          (3) Leave to participate in certain Commission proceedings by a

     representative of the United States Department of Justice, a United States

     Attorney's Office, or a criminal prosecutorial authority of any State or

     any other political subdivision of a State.   The Commission or the hearing

     officer may grant leave to participate on a limited basis to an authorized

     representative of the United States Department of Justice, an authorized

     representative of a United States Attorney, or an authorized representative

     of any criminal prosecutorial authority of any State or any other political

     subdivision of a State for the purpose of requesting a stay during the


                              ======END OF PAGE 6======







     pendency of a criminal investigation or prosecution arising out of the same

     or similar facts that are at issue in the pending Commission enforcement or

     disciplinary proceeding.  Upon a showing that such a stay is in the public

     interest or for the protection of investors, the motion for stay shall be

     favored.  A stay granted under this paragraph (c)(3) may be granted for

     such a period and upon such conditions as the Commission or the hearing

     officer deems appropriate. 

                                      * * * * *

          3. Section 201.221 is amended by revising the section heading and

     paragraphs (a) and (d) to read as follows:


































                              ======END OF PAGE 7======







       201.221 Prehearing conference.

          (a) Purposes of conference.  The purposes of a    prehearing

     conference include, but are not limited to:

          (1) Expediting the disposition of the proceeding;

          (2) Establishing early and continuing control of the proceeding by the

     hearing officer; and

          (3) Improving the quality of the hearing through more thorough

     preparation.

                                      * * * * *

          (d) Required prehearing conference. Except where the emergency nature

     of a proceeding would make a prehearing conference clearly inappropriate,

     at least one prehearing conference should be held.

                                      * * * * *

          By the Commission.





                                        Jonathan G. Katz
                                          Secretary


     November 4, 1998
















                              ======END OF PAGE 8======