==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15090 / September 30, 1996 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. M.T.L. INTERNATIONAL FINANCE INC., ET AL., 96 Civ. 7412 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) On September 30, 1996, the Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking injunctive and other equitable relief against M.T.L. International Finance Inc., Equity Action Inc., John K. Robinson, Leon Howard and Harry Walker. The Commission's complaint alleges that from December 1992, until at least April 1994, the defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by offering and selling securities in the form of purported guaranteed insurance contracts ("GICs"), which they falsely claimed were issued and guaranteed by a consortium of European insurance and reinsurance companies. The complaint alleges that the GICs did not exist. The complaint also alleges that the defendants promised prospective investors returns at an annualized rate of almost 840% for investing in the GICs, and that the defendants had no authority to act on behalf of the purported issuers and guarantors of the GICs for any purpose whatsoever. At least five investors lost approximately $712,000 as a result of the GIC scheme. The complaint alleges that the defendant's conduct violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. In addition, the complaint alleges that M.T.L. International Finance Inc. and Robinson violated Section 207 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by willfully filing a false registration form with the Commission in an attempt to register M.T.L. International Finance as an investment adviser. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the false registration statement included a balance sheet listing assets totalling in excess of $62 million. According to the complaint, the balance sheet was false and misleading in that M.T.L. International Finance did not then have, nor had it ever had, assets in excess of $10,000. The Commission also instituted related administrative proceedings against Stires & Co., Inc., Sidney H. Stires, Curtis Lynch, and David Hollander for their roles in offering and selling the non-existent GICs that are the subject of the civil action. The administrative proceedings allege violations of the antifraud and broker-dealer registration provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Lynch and Hollander have consented to the entry of an Order by the Commission which finds such violations and requires disgorgement of profits, but waives payment of the disgorgement based on their demonstrated financial conditions. A hearing will be scheduled to determine what, if any, remedial ==========================================START OF PAGE 2====== action is appropriate in the public interest against Stires & Co. and Sidney Stires. (See also Administrative Proceeding Files 3-9120 and 3-9121).