U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 14987 / July 23, 1996 Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. A.R. Baron & Co., Inc., No. 96-CIV-5171 (S.D.N.Y.); In the Matter of: A.R. Baron & Co., Inc., No. 96-25927 (WTF) (Bankr. D.N.J.); In the Matter of: Andrew E. Bressman, 96-25926 (WTF) (Bankr. D.N.J.); and In the Matter of: Roman Okin, 96-25928 (WTF) (Bankr. D.N.J.); In the Matter of: A.R. Baron & Co., Inc., No. 96-8831A (PBA) SIPA (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) The Commission, in cooperation with the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), announced the appointment on July 11, 1996 of James W. Giddens of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP as trustee to take control and liquidate the assets of A.R. Baron & Co., Inc., to protect investors. A.R. Baron, a broker-dealer headquartered in New York City, and two of its principals, Andrew Bressman and Roman Okin, had filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 3 and 5, 1996. The appointment of the SIPC trustee stays the A.R. Baron bankruptcy proceeding and places all A.R. Baron assets in the control of the trustee. The A.R. Baron bankruptcy proceeding was removed to the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Also on July 11, 1996, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey entered consent orders prohibiting Bressman and Okin from using any property of the bankrupt estates except upon application to the Bankruptcy Court and notice to the Commission, and requiring them to file statements of financial affairs by July 18, 1996, and to submit to an examination by the Commission staff concerning the debtors' financial condition. The Commission previously ordered an emergency Temporary Cease and Desist Order and related interim relief, to which A.R. Baron, Bressman, and Okin consented. The Respondents have now offered to consent to a Supplemental Order, without admitting or denying any of its allegations, requiring them to cease and desist soliciting or effecting transactions for Baron or any customer in any security, other than liquidating customer positions while the previously-issued Temporary Cease and Desist Order is in effect. The Division of Enforcement alleged in its cease-and-desist proceeding (Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9010) that, from at least February 1995, Respondents engaged in egregious fraudulent sales practices, including: ù Placing unauthorized trades in customer accounts; ù Refusing to carry out customer sell orders; ù Refusing or delaying to remit proceeds of sales of securities to customers; ==========================================START OF PAGE 2====== ù Opening accounts for customers without the customers' authorization; and ù Placing margin transactions in customer accounts without the customers' authorization. These practices, it is alleged, are the subject of numerous recent customer complaints, involving nearly $17 million in securities.