==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 1553 / February 22, 1996 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 Release No. 21770 / February 22, 1996 Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-8954 The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that on February 22, 1996, the Commission instituted public administrative proceedings pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") and Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company Act") against Leroy S. Brenna and Dorothy J. Brenna (collective- ly, "the Brennas"). The Order Instituting Proceedings alleges, in part, that in October 1991, the Brennas caused to be filed with the Commission and disseminated to shareholders a proxy statement that failed to disclose that the Brennas were to receive a $2 million payment in connection with the sale of investment advisory contracts. The Order further alleges that the Brennas have been permanently enjoined by judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in an action styled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Strategic Management, Inc., et al, USDC, N.D./Tex. [Dallas Division], CA No. 3:91CV2489-R, from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Advisers Act, and from aiding and abetting future violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 20a-1 thereunder. The Order also alleges that, in the same action, the district court permanently enjoined Leroy Brenna from acting as an investment adviser to any registered investment company pursuant to Section 36(a) of the Investment Company Act. A hearing will be scheduled to take evidence on the staff's allegations and to afford the Brennas an opportunity to present any defense thereto. The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether the allegations are true and to determine what, if any, remedial sanctions are appropriate.