UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 39127 / September 25, 1997 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-9434 ) ORDER INSTITUTING In the Matter of ) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS, ) MAKING FINDINGS, AND MICHAEL J. OBERHOLZER, ) IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS ) Respondent. ) ) I. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate and in the public interest to institute a public administrative proceeding pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") against Michael J. Oberholzer ("Oberholzer"). In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Oberholzer has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept solely for the purposes of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission is a party. Without admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except that Oberholzer admits the jurisdiction of the Commission over him and over the subject matter of these proceedings, and further admits the entry of the injunction set forth in paragraph II.B. below, Oberholzer consents to the issuance of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order"). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that a proceeding pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act be, and hereby is, instituted. II. On the basis of this Order and the Offer, the Commission makes the following findings: A. From January 1989 through September 1995, Oberholzer was a registered representative with a broker-dealer registered with the Commission. B. On September 19, 1997, a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction was entered against Oberholzer by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the case entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael J. Oberholzer, Civil Action No. C97-3320 (N.D. Cal.), enjoining him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and Sections 10(b) and 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 17a-3 thereunder. Oberholzer had consented to the entry of the Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction without admitting or denying any of the allegations contained in the Complaint, except as to jurisdiction which he admitted. C. The Commission's Complaint in the civil action referred to in paragraph B. above alleged that from September 1989 through September 1995 Oberholzer violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by engaging in the following conduct in the accounts of at least four customers: churning, unauthorized trading, unsuitable trading, and material misrepresentations and omissions. It also alleged that Oberholzer falsified the books and records of a broker-dealer, which aided and abetted the broker-dealer's violations of the books and records provisions, Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-3 thereunder. III. In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanction specified by Oberholzer in the Offer. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that: Oberholzer be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment adviser, or investment company. By the Commission. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary ======END OF PAGE 2======