UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                               Before the
                   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No.  37153 / April 30, 1996

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 
File No. 3-8995
------------------------------                              
                              :
In the Matter of              :    ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS,
Kevin Bartholomew,            :    MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING  
                              :    SANCTIONS 
                              : 
                              : 
                Respondent.   : 
------------------------------:   



                                I.

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems
it appropriate and in the public interest that public proceedings
be instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of
1933 ("Securities Act") and Sections 15(b), 19(h), and 21C of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Kevin
Bartholomew ("Bartholomew").
 
     In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
proceedings, Bartholomew has submitted an Offer of Settlement
("Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely
for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding
brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or in which the
Commission is a party, Bartholomew by his Offer, without
admitting or denying the Commission's findings as to him, except
for those findings contained in Section III.1, which are admitted
by Bartholomew, consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Sanctions ("Order").

                              II.

     Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that proceedings pursuant to
Section 8A of the Securities Act and Sections 15(b), 19(h), and
21C of the Exchange Act be, and hereby are, instituted.
==========================================START OF PAGE 2======

                               III.

     On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted the
Commission finds-[1]- that:

          1.   Bartholomew is a 42 year old resident of Omaha, 
          Nebraska.  He was employed by PaineWebber Incorporated
          ("PaineWebber") from 1984 until he was permitted to
          resign in January 1995.  Bartholomew was a registered
          representative at PaineWebber's Omaha, Nebraska office
          from October 1987 until January 1995. 

          2.   From at least 1988 until 1992, Bartholomew sold 
          direct investments to a number of investors for whom
          the investments were not suitable in light of their
          age, financial condition and conservative investment
          objectives.  Many of Bartholomew's customers were
          retired or close to retirement and expressly informed
          him that they desired liquid, income-producing, low-
          risk investments.  Bartholomew concentrated high
          percentages of many of these customers' investments in
          direct investments, which were not liquid and not
          suitable for investors with conservative investment
          objectives.    Bartholomew also misrepresented to many
          of his customers the liquidity, risks, and benefits of
          purchasing direct investments.  

          3.   In July 1992, Bartholomew purchased securities 
          without authorization in the account of a 57 year old
          customer, who did not have sufficient funds to pay for
          these securities.  When this customer contacted
          Bartholomew about the unauthorized transaction,
          Bartholomew convinced her to keep the securities by
          offering to obtain loans from some of his other
          customers to pay for the securities.  In August 1992,
          Bartholomew persuaded five of his customers to loan
          this customer a total of $130,000.  Bartholomew
          prepared and delivered to each of the five customers
          hand written promissory notes, each of which pledged
          the securities in this customer's account as collateral
          for the loan.  Bartholomew failed to inform any of the
          five lending customers of the existence of the loans
          made by the other lending customers or that the
          securities pledged as collateral had also been pledged
          to the other lending customers.   

          4.   From at least April 1994 until around October

---------FOOTNOTES----------
     -[1]-     The   findings   herein  are   made   pursuant  to
Bartholomew's  Offer and are not  binding on any  other person or
entity named as a respondent in this or any other proceeding.
==========================================START OF PAGE 3======

1994,          Bartholomew sold investments to his customers in
               his "Memories of Elvis in Concert" act (the "Elvis
               Act"), an Elvis Presley impersonation act
               performed by Bartholomew.  
          5.   As a result of conduct described in paragraphs 2,
          3, and 4, Bartholomew willfully violated Section 17(a)
          of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange
          Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

          6.   The Commission has reviewed Bartholomew's sworn 
          financial statement and other evidence adduced by
          Bartholomew, and, provided that he has submitted a
          true, accurate and complete sworn affidavit concerning
          his financial condition, including his assets,
          liabilities, income and expenses, has determined that
          Bartholomew does not have the financial ability to pay
          an administrative penalty.  The determination not to
          impose an administrative penalty is based upon
          Bartholomew's demonstrated inability to pay an
          administrative penalty, provided that the Division of
          Enforcement ("Division") may petition the
          Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") to reopen this matter
          to consider Bartholomew's inability to pay an
          administrative penalty if the Division obtains
          information from any source that the financial
          information provided by Bartholomew was inaccurate or
          incomplete in any material aspect.  In connection with
          such petition, the ALJ may consider ordering
          Bartholomew to pay an administrative penalty. 
          Bartholomew, may not, by way of defense to such
          petition, contest the allegations and findings in this
          Order or assert that an administrative penalty shall
          not be ordered for the violations of the federal
          securities laws alleged therein.  

                               IV.

     In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it
appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions
specified in the Offer submitted by Bartholomew.

     Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

      1.  Bartholomew be, and hereby is, barred from association
with any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment
adviser or investment company. 
==========================================START OF PAGE 4======

      2.  Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and
Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Bartholomew shall cease and
desist from committing or causing any violation or future
violation, of Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act and 10(b) of
the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

 
     By the Commission.


                              Jonathan G. Katz
                              Secretary