SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C.

     LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15571 / November 25, 1997

     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHARLES O. HUTTOE, ET AL., Civil
     Action No. 96-02543 (GK)(D.D.C.)

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") today announced
     settlements with Charles O. Huttoe and certain other persons and entities
     to be named as Relief Defendants in the action previously filed against
     him.  The Commission filed its complaint on an emergency basis in this
     action on November 7, 1996, and charged Huttoe, formerly the Chairman of
     the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Systems of Excellence, Inc.
     ("SOE"), with orchestrating what was then an ongoing, massive market
     manipulation of that company's securities.  The complaint alleged that he
     secretly distributed millions of SOE shares in the names of his family
     members and corporations, issued false favorable information concerning SOE
     and its business, and then sold his shares into the inflated market.  The
     Commission has also moved to recover Huttoe's illegal profits from several
     Relief Defendants -- persons and entities that the Commission has alleged
     were the beneficiaries of a massive effort by Huttoe to dissipate and
     secrete those profits before the Commission's complaint was filed.

          As part of the settlement, Huttoe, without admitting or denying the
     allegations made in the Commission's complaint, consented to the entry of a
     final judgment of permanent injunction prohibiting him from violating
     Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"),
     Sections 10(b), 13(b)(5), and 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
     ("Exchange Act"), and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1, 13b2-2, 16a-2, and 16a-3
     thereunder.  The Order also permanently bars Huttoe from acting as an
     officer or director of a public company.  The Order requires that Huttoe
     disgorge $12,543,770, the total amount of monies or benefits that he
     derived from the conduct alleged in the complaint, provided that except for
     surrendering to the Court-appointed receiver in this case certain assets
     described in Huttoe's sworn statement of his financial condition, payment
     of the disgorgement amount is waived in light of his demonstrated inability
     to pay based on his sworn representations in his statement of financial
     condition.  The Order also requires Huttoe to cooperate with the Commission
     and the Court-appointed receiver to, among other things, effect the
     surrender of all the proceeds of the fraud that are held by any other
     person.  As an additional part of the settlement, Huttoe consented to the
     entry of a Commission Order barring him from association with any broker,
     dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment adviser or investment
     company.  

          As previously announced, on November 13, 1996, Huttoe pled guilty to a
     two count information charging him with securities fraud and money
     laundering arising out of his conduct at SOE.  On January 31, 1997, he was
     sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment.  He is presently serving that
     sentence. See Lit. Rel. 15237 (January 31, 1997).

          The Commission also announced settlements with Karen Purvis Huttoe
     ("Purvis"), who is Huttoe's wife, and Tammy Jo Perkins ("Perkins"), who is







     Huttoe's niece.  The Commission previously had alleged that Huttoe had
     issued SOE shares to them as well as to the late Josephine Brooks
     ("Brooks"), Huttoe's mother, that those shares were sold during the
     manipulation and that Purvis, Perkins and Brooks had violated Section 5 of
     the Securities Act.  In light of evidence obtained in discovery in this
     matter, the Commission today requested leave of the Court to amend its
     complaint to drop the charge that they violated Section 5 of the Securities
     Act, and instead to name Purvis and Perkins as Relief Defendants.  Purvis
     and Perkins have consented to orders requiring that they disgorge the
     contents of the brokerage and bank accounts in their names that were used
     to sell SOE securities or into which proceeds of those sales were
     deposited.  The Commission also filed a motion with Brooks' counsel's
     consent requiring that assets held in such accounts in her name be
     surrendered to the Court-appointed receiver.  Purvis also agreed to
     disgorge an additional $258,650 representing illegal proceeds that she
     received from Huttoe, provided that payment was waived in light of her
     demonstrated inability to pay based on her sworn representations in her
     statement of financial condition.

          The Commission also announced developments with regard to several
     other Relief Defendants.  Today, Starlog Franchise Corp., Hope Associates,
     L.L.C., Michael Michaelson, Raymond J. Markman, Herman Rush, Mark Savel and
     George Holsten filed consents to the entry of orders requiring them to
     disgorge a total of $950,000 that the Commission alleged they received,
     directly or indirectly, from Huttoe.  Finally, the Commission announced
     that on November 7, 1997, the Court granted its motion for leave to amend
     its complaint to add Mary Jane Hubbard as a Relief  Defendant, granted a
     preliminary injunction against Hubbard and froze $531,450 representing
     funds Hubbard received from Huttoe.

          The Commission previously has made several announcements concerning
     this matter.  See Lit. Rel. 15490 (September 12, 1997); Lit. Rel. 15286
     (March 12, 1997); Lit. Rel. 15237 (January 31, 1997); Lit. Rel. 15185
     (December 12, 1996); Lit. Rel. 15153 (November 7, 1996); Securities
     Exchange Act Rel. No. 37791 (October 7, 1996).  

          The Commission is cooperating with separate investigations in this
     matter carried on by the United States Attorney's Offices for the District
     of Nevada and the Eastern District of Virginia, and the Criminal
     Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service.  

          The Commission's investigation in this matter is continuing.











                              ======END OF PAGE 2======