Subject: Commenting on SR-OCC-2024-001
From: Stephen Olszewski
Affiliation:

Mar. 5, 2024

Office of the Secretary 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
100 F Street, NE 
Washington, DC 20549
Subject: Public Comment on Proposed Rule Change by the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) Concerning Margin Requirement Calculations
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed rule change by the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) to adjust the parameters for calculating margin requirements during periods of high market volatility. As an individual with a vested interest in the stability and transparency of our financial markets, I believe it is imperative to scrutinize the potential ramifications of such changes on market participants and the overall market stability.
Concerns Regarding Market Stability 
The proposed adjustments to margin requirement calculations during volatile periods could have unintended consequences on market stability. By potentially increasing margin requirements significantly during volatile periods, there is a risk of exacerbating the very volatility the changes aim to mitigate. This could lead to increased costs for market participants, reduced liquidity, and greater market stress during critical times. I urge the SEC to consider the broader implications of these changes on market dynamics and the potential for creating more volatile market conditions.
Lack of Transparency in Redacted Materials 
Another significant concern is the lack of transparency associated with the redacted materials related to the proposed rule change. The absence of detailed information hinders the ability of stakeholders to fully understand the implications of the proposed adjustments and to assess their potential impact accurately. Transparency is a cornerstone of trust and stability in the financial markets. Therefore, I advocate for the release of all relevant information and data that support the proposed changes, ensuring that stakeholders can make informed comments and decisions.
Conflict of Interest Concerns 
The role of the Financial Risk Management (FRM) Officer, as outlined in the proposed changes, raises concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest. Given the FRM Officer's involvement in setting margin levels and their significant impact on market participants, it is crucial to establish clear, independent oversight mechanisms to prevent any conflicts of interest. Ensuring the impartiality of those responsible for managing financial risk is essential for maintaining the integrity and fairness of the financial markets.
Advocacy for Thorough Reconsideration 
Given these concerns, I respectfully request that the SEC undertake a thorough reconsideration of the proposed rule change by the OCC. It is vital that any adjustments to margin requirement calculations are carefully evaluated to ensure they contribute positively to market stability, are grounded in transparency, and are free from conflicts of interest. I advocate for a comprehensive review process that includes a wider range of stakeholder inputs, detailed analysis of potential market impacts, and a commitment to maintaining the highest standards of market integrity.
In conclusion, while the goal of enhancing financial market stability is commendable, it is crucial that such efforts are pursued with a keen awareness of the broader implications, a commitment to transparency, and a rigorous adherence to ethical standards. I thank you for your attention to these concerns and look forward to your thoughtful consideration of the points raised in this letter.
Sincerely,
Stephen