Subject: Posed risks and issues with the SR-OCC-2024-001 34-99393 rule
From: nigel jones
Affiliation:

Feb. 4, 2024

Dear Securities and Exchange Commission,

I'm writing to express concerns about the Options Clearing
Corporation's proposed rule change on margin requirements during high
market volatility. As a long-term investor, I value market stability
and fairness.

The current proposal seems to shield risky positions from margin calls
during volatile periods, potentially leading to unchecked risks and
market instability. The role of the Financial Risk Management Officer
raises a conflict of interest concern, compounded by a lack of
transparency in the proposal's materials.

While acknowledging the OCC's intent, it's vital to ensure risk
management measures don't shelter bad bets. I suggest prioritizing
Clearing Fund deposits over OCC's resources in the loss allocation
framework to enhance fairness.

I propose additional safeguards, such as an independent review
mechanism and enhanced transparency requirements, to reinforce
accountability and trust. Strengthening oversight mechanisms and
incorporating public input are also essential steps.

In conclusion, I urge the SEC to consider these concerns for a rule
that promotes fairness and market integrity.

And to address the problems as posed in the rule, here are suggestions
you can put forward to improve our financial markets:

1. Increase and enforce margin requirements to prevent excessive risk-taking.
2. Modify the Loss Allocation waterfall, prioritizing Clearing fund
deposits of non-defaulting firms over OCC's pre-funded financial
resources.
3. Introduce external auditing and supervision as a "fourth line of
defense" with public reporting.
4. Strengthen oversight mechanisms, actively involving regulatory
bodies during heightened market volatility.
5. Establish industry-wide standards and best practices for consistent
risk management.
6. Provide clearer guidelines for idiosyncratic controls, preventing
misuse with a structured evaluation framework.
7. Emphasize enhanced transparency requirements in reporting and
decision-making.
8. Advocate for public accessibility of stress testing results,
showcasing effectiveness and building trust.
9. Incorporate public input through consultations and hearings,
fostering inclusivity.
10. Consider establishing an external oversight committee for
impartial evaluation and scrutiny.

Best,
Nigel