From: Finn Terdal
Sent: January 11, 2016
To: rule-comments@sec.gov
Subject: File No. S7-22-15

Dear SEC,

I would very much support two key amendments to Rule 147.

1. Offerings made in reliance on rule 147 should be able to be viewed anywhere, but only purchased in-state. These days, most marketing and advertising is done online, particularly in social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook). Limiting offerings to intra-state advertising is a crippling disadvantage.

2. There should be some kind of "local company" test. Requiring that the issuing company be registered in the state where the sales occur is a rather crude measure of "local", since many companies are registered in Delaware but do essentially no business there. A more appropriate test of a "local company" would be one that has at least 80% of the employee wages paid in state, or perhaps 80% of the work (i.e. manufacturing, producing, brewing, etc) be done in state. These are just a few ideas, but something similar would suffice.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I eagerly await news about changes made to rule 147.

Sincerely,


Finn Terdal, Technology Coordinator
HATCH INNOVATION
2420 NE Sandy Blvd.

Portland, OR 97232