Subject: S7-18-21: WebForm Comments from Jim
From: Jim
Affiliation: Millwright

Aug. 16, 2022

August 16, 2022

 I'm just going to copy and paste this here, read it over,  we the(retail investor) are getting hip to the fact you let these hedge funds take from us and run our countries companies into the ground, no that needs to stop, we need to know where your shorts are. I mean it's a free and fair market amiright? Do the right thing here,hell other countries don't even allow shorting

Explicitly support transaction-by-transaction reporting because it eliminates the ability to \"hide within the aggregate\" transparency means transparency and aggregates are not transparent.

- Explicit support the 15-minute reporting requirement, saying the cost and effort are justified to prevent fraud and prevent hiding in loopholes.

- Explicitly say that victimized companies need a greater ability to defend themselves against predators, and that \"short selling in the dark\" harms true competition and price discovery. The idea that a small number of short-selling funds \"know best\" and can hammer unsuspecting companies in the dark is shameful.

- Talk about how retail will benefit from increased transparency. We have a much better idea of the risks of our decisions and transactions if we can see who is targeted which companies. If funds are allowed to short in the dark, retail investors remain dangerously unaware of the risks they take on when purchasing securities.

- Talk about the new and very desirable phenomenon of the public serving as first-line watchdogs in monitoring short selling data for securities fraud, strengthening the SEC and better enabling it to fulfill its mandate, at no cost.

- Talk about the dangers inherent in long, untracked lending chains, that can lead to economic fragility. Securities lending activity can hide massively destructive chains of obligation that can even be a threat to national security, and so transparency in this area is more important than it has ever been.